76 was first designed as a medium tank without tech requirement for soviets. As such it didnt need to be very good, no tech was enough. Then they bound it to tech and it was pretty clear this tank sucks. And THEN they added it to the reworked mechanized company and now we pretend its a good unit.
But the balance team is not so concerned about the USF faction. They carefully monitor the popularity of such units as the StuG, Ostwind, and kubel. |
lol no, people are already pissed at the thing.
I would like to see the scott get a little more armor though, things like 222 and ostwinds can actually kill them very easily. Maybe a little more health so I can't get fausted at full health?
What does it mean "people are already pissed at the thing"? Axis funs dont love Scott?
But at the tournament in the Masters Cup, not Scott wiped the squads in every battle, but a walking stuka did it. So why not transfer it to the Schwerer Panzer HQ, or transfer Scott to the CP or LT? |
someone forgot to say that the schrecks have horrible accu vs mid and far targets and will misses so often. and you forgot to said that double zooks makes more dmg and and have less reload...so more dps.
what you said would be true if the bazookas had a better penetration. But they are useless against panthers. When a panzershrek is effective against sherman e8 and pershing.
And do not change the subject towards the rangers and paratroopers. This is a doctrine. And we compared the rear echelon and the sturmpioneers. |
- If I order a standard Sherman 75 mm, I take it against the infantry, because it has high-explosive shells.
- If I want a more armored tank and a universal tank - I take Sherman E8.
- If I want to play against panther and tigers, I take Jackson.
- If I see Ferdinand or Jagdtiger on the battlefield, I prepare myself for defeat.
The question is, why do we need a Sherman 76mm? Moreover, it is a doctrine. Does it have more armor and health compared to a standard Sherman? - not. The difference in gun penetration is very slight. Why do I need it if I can take Jackson?
The role of this tank is very ambiguous. And it is still honorably in doctrine.
More and more convinced that the design of the USF faction, and the design of the commanders is some kind of joke. |
Why does OKW get powerful artillery like a walking stuka so early, and does a less powerful Scott come out with a major?
I think this is not fair, considering how powerful the walking stuka is, and how in an instant it can wipe entire squad.
|
comparing 2 cp with Schwerer Panzer HQ ...
tier 0 with 2 trucks deployed,
You should understand what you read first.
I think I made the truth very clear, it will be that my English is bad.
by the way game with all the features especially with ukf
3 cp
|
I don't see the problem while the mg34 is locked after a second truck.
I would like to see obers in t0 even for a change and not always use volks
Then I also want to see paratroopers in t0, or ranger for USF. |
Now to why the Thompson SMG is a bad idea for these Assault Guards.
It's more of historical reason than the balance reason, but I just wanted to point it out, as we, Russians,
LOL. You were given a buff, and you say this is a bad idea. |
.... i see that u can't read considering we both agred that okw does not get free upgrades
this explains why u are a bit biased, it's not bias u just can't read and so don't know how the units actually perform
Get it, juggler.
Hannibal say:
But you're missing the point that I make since we are talking about early game timing here. The perks of USF that you mentioned mostly come into effect from mid game onwards into the late game. USF is missing on quite a lot of MP (and a bit of FU) in the early game if they wanted to side tech everything to about OKW level, so they usually can't do that.
U (fastest axis fan in coh2.org) Stug Life:
"but yes i do agree in mp okw has an advantage"
Here you are caught. Please do not continue, your stay here so unpleasant.
|
1 Shreck Sturmpio is definitely worse than 2 zooks for USF, espeically when there is huge cost difference and efficiency. 2 zooks is definitely better.
Funny analytics from the axis fan.
Rear Echelon with 2 zooks better ONLY against light vehicle, and only if it penetrate. Panzershreck penetrate all USF Tanks. But you are a fan of the axis, what to talk about with you. There is not even a guarantee that the bazooka penetrates the luchs at medium or long range.
You still have to pay fuel and MP to access the racks. "espeically when there is huge cost difference" Exact, USF pays more. |