dumping 700MP into indirect isn't a lot
Damn ok
Anyway nerf idea is stupid because usf dont need another mortar better idea is to redesign it to something similar to little priest witout autofire
Posts: 1220
dumping 700MP into indirect isn't a lot
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1
pretty sure it comes at roughly the same time as the LeIG but the LeIG is garbage by comparison.
Posts: 1220
1+
Leig is 70mp cheaper than the pakhowy. And bghq is still cheaper than cpt tech.
OKW can also get walking stuka, which is almost impossible to dodge for the Pak howy. Lost so many of those despite moving it the instant I heard the rockets
Posts: 4183 | Subs: 4
Leig is 70mp cheaper than the pakhowy. And bghq is still cheaper than cpt tech.
OKW can also get walking stuka, which is almost impossible to dodge for the Pak howi. Lost so many of those despite moving it the instant I heard the rockets
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
70 mp and a lot worse. I'd rather the pak howi like that instead of obliterating 4 man grens. Yes stuka kills teamweapons very well, but that isn't really viable in 1v1 and also why the crew shouldn't have been lowered to 5 man, because you have basically 2% chance you retain the pak howi vet once you hear those rockets.
Posts: 810
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
Posts: 450
Some units simple escaped the indirect fire patch nerf.
The way the Pack Howie was nerfed was simple a band aid to a problem which they would need to address sooner or later.
Posts: 4183 | Subs: 4
It is not as simple as that. Usf needs units to deal with turtles more than other factions
Posts: 450
So is OKW and UKF. OKWs only indirect is locked behind a subpar tech structure (for 1v1) and UKF don't even get mobile indirect. USF at least have got a t0 mortar and just had a tech rework.
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
It is not as simple as that. Usf needs units to deal with turtles more than other factions
Posts: 450
The Pack Howie needs to be less mortar on steroids without retreat and more Howitzer instead.
Posts: 960
It destroys moving units incredibly well...
The problem is, the pack howie basically hard-counters all of Ost's units with nearly zero user input. ...
Posts: 2742
Posts: 5279
The Pack Howie needs to be less mortar on steroids without retreat and more Howitzer instead.
Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1
reduce/remove autofire
reduce cooldown on barrage
?????
still unique but powerful!
Posts: 232
Some units simple escaped the indirect fire patch nerf.
The way the Pack Howie was nerfed was simple a band aid to a problem which they would need to address sooner or later.
Posts: 3166 | Subs: 6
It should be on par with the OKW leig
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
Why should a 340 manpower unit be on par with a 270 manpower unit? Especially when that 340MP unit is the only stock heavy indirect fire option (as in being the equivalent of rocket arty) the faction has?
Posts: 3166 | Subs: 6
Rocket artillery equivalent argument does not hold any water at all. The mechanism of rocket artillery and Pak howitzer are completely different, so is timing and fuel cost.
If we are talking about roles (providing indirect fire support) USF have enough strong stock options and many very strong doctrinal options.
108 | |||||
27 | |||||
19 | |||||
63 | |||||
56 | |||||
15 | |||||
9 | |||||
1 | |||||
1 |