1. Really sad that you try to portay okw as being heavely doctrine dependent. There is more then volks or fussies. You purposely leave out sturms and the kubel, a feul free vehicle. That you only spam volks is on you.
I have never said that, thats your own opinion about OKM, not mine. I just pointed out how doctrinally SU gives more variety.
2. And your point is? All off them are good enough.
3. Again you forget sturms for okw, but then you do count the su sniper. Why are you even posting?
Sov have so much callin inf and teams because all off their non doc inf and wpn teams except penals are not as effective as other factions counterparts are. Despite being a little more durable.
Yeah lets spam sturmpios... looses at min5 and ragequits. I am not even taking consideration of bad plays, so i excluse as A VIABLE OPTION to use NON COMBATANT troops as a FRONTLINE unit. But if you do, fine! Gl winning games tho.
4. Cons have a lot off utility indeed but half is in doctrines and thus exclude eachother. Their scaling also is doctrinal depended. Volks dont need any doctrine for any off that and do more then cons. With cons you pay for what you cant get, about a third off that utility is not available at the same time. And they also pay more for basic utility.
For 10 mp more volks wreck cons and its fine. For 50 mp more plus tech structure and you are suprised penals beat volks?
If you pick a doctrine that do not upgrades cons, it means you do not rely on them after min 5. Its simple mafs. But Again volks vs cons is not only a broken comparison, a everlasting repeated one, a one i said im ignoring until cons get fixed (everyone here agrees cons need a buff) and finally as long as penals can (and they do) beat volks the comparison is valid, as i stated the limits of my comparison and i did not mention nothing about cost efficiency, just how that argument backfires.