Give OKW flame nade a tech cost?

Jump back to quoted post4 Jun 2018, 21:57 PMStug life

one cost fuel,tech and more munitions both have 30 range (the previus patch the UC had actually more range)

Jump back to quoted post4 Jun 2018, 22:03 PMswordfisch

hey stug bias you need tech for the wasp too

just ignore all the other plus points the flamer 251 gets though, you know like double flamers.

Jump back to quoted post4 Jun 2018, 22:07 PMStug life

can u please do the math and tell me when they come ? i do rember 30<60 uneless someone toyed with the basic rules of mathemathics
if not then it does comes with the tier advantage

obviusly it's better it cost more and is on a different tier, what did u want the wasp to perform the same ? for less than 1/4 of the cost ?

Jump back to quoted post4 Jun 2018, 22:13 PMswordfisch

I'll tell you when they come

bren carrier comes early but is useless until it upgrades to flamer at 3mins, then by 4mins it is dead to 222 due to no snare to protect it.

251 is usually built after 222 and is used to mop up brits as you melt their crappy mortar pit or whatever units they have. Don't worry about AEC because you have snare to shield your units unlike them.

Wasp should be buffed (old range and more mobility) and get a price increase, it needs survivability.

Jump back to quoted post5 Jun 2018, 07:17 AMullumulu

Lets make a deal:

put it behind a paywall...and make them cheaper...like molotovs 10-15muni and it will be ok. What do u get now? a longtime use-increase for flame nades.. GZ!

Jump back to quoted post5 Jun 2018, 08:27 AMKatitof

Molotovs are 15 and are incomparably shittier then flame nades with lower range and much longer throw time.

Jump back to quoted post5 Jun 2018, 08:48 AMthedarkarmadillo

Molotov are 20mu now if I'm not mistaken or was it oorah alone that got the price bump?

Jump back to quoted post5 Jun 2018, 09:25 AMLago

They became 20 munitions in DBP but their unlock cost went from 125/15 to 80/10.

Jump back to quoted post5 Jun 2018, 08:27 AMKatitof

Molotovs are 15 and are incomparably shittier then flame nades with lower range and much longer throw time.

Jump back to quoted post6 Jun 2018, 05:57 AMullumulu

you also forget to tell us that the flame nade has a timer .... and molotovs not. they make dmg exatly after hitting the target...not after 2-3 sec. so you "longer animation" doesnt count. One more senseless argue?

Jump back to quoted post7 Jun 2018, 04:04 AMFiresparks

the vet 0 molly have the longest and most obvious throwing animation in the game. The guy literally does a little dance to warn you he's throwing a molly. The range is shorter too.

The volk flame grenade is still faster even with the timer.

Jump back to quoted post7 Jun 2018, 05:49 AMullumulu

not really.it is mostly the same time to deal dmg. test it yourself.

Jump back to quoted post7 Jun 2018, 06:03 AMthedarkarmadillo

Long animation means for duration there's - 1 model firing or the squad is not advancing. Molotov isn't bad now but anyone saying it's not worse than the lava nade is delusional.

Jump back to quoted post7 Jun 2018, 06:17 AMullumulu

you also forget that the molos are on a squad with sprint as standard abilty. This means you can flank much easiy houses or teamweopons and throw it. much easier with sprint....than without.
and combine this with ppsh and u can count on a wipe.

Jump back to quoted post7 Jun 2018, 07:13 AMthedarkarmadillo

So if the Soviet player combines a side grade, a doctrinal 60mu upgrade and 2 abilities it'll skirt the weakness of their molotov? Gosh darn it relic how many times do we have to tell you! If it's on WFA it's supposed to be unconditionally better momatter what the EFA combines!