@Purlictor: Then where/how is the disparity I indicated reconciled to Ostheer, asymmetrically?
Note: I already demonstrated, quality wise, 81mm mortars rate of fire is asymmetrically balanced to 82mm larger AoE and dmg, as is also the asymmetric relationship between the Howitzers, Doctrine mortars, and (in a more complex system of asymmetry) between katyusha/panzerwerfer.
"Please at least think for more than a few second before replying"
WHERE/HOW is the asymmetric balance vested for these superfluos barrage options which have no current equivalency on Ost?
You demonstrated? You demonstrated nothing. You gave no statistics whatsoever to back up your claims that certain units' traits balance out. Take for example both faction's howitzers. You said here
Your German Panzerwerfer/Mortar/Howitzer "indirect" fire rate of fire and cooldowns argument was irrelevant, because it is accounted for commensurately by Sov alternatives having asymmetric equivalence in terms of more damage and AoE.
That the German howitzer/mortar's lower cooldown is balanced out by the increased AoE and damage of the Soviet one.
You simply stated them as fact. You have given no comparison between the units other than a vague summation of their relative strengths and weaknesses and your subjective conclusion on why these balance each other out. How are you supposed to argue balance when you provide no factual evidence to your point?
It's not as simple as saying that the broader availability of indirect fire is compensated for by only a few things. That's the whole point of factions which have no units, buildings or commanders in common whatsoever. Nevertheless I stated the larger amount of non-doctrinal heavier tanks as an example of where the Ostheer would be at an advantage (which is true either way, whether you count the SU-85/SU-76/Brummbar/StuG (assault guns/tank destroyers) as tanks or not). I could even argue that the Ostheer mortar halftrack compensates for the lack of barrage abilites due to its unique nature.