defensive doctrin
Posts: 558 | Subs: 1
dshk penetration seems to suck a lot. AP rounds are crap compared to MG42 ones. (do they actually work..?)
the tanktraps are also a bit of a joke aswell, because USF has non doctrinal ones at 0 CP.
i would also love to see the 45mm AT at 1CP tbh.
what are your opinions on it?
Posts: 354
Dshk AP rounds are just *3 penetration, and its like 13.5/9/4.5 with them, if I remember correctly. Mg-42 AP rounds are +9 penetration, so it will be 11.2/10.8/10.4, and double damage. Dshk still have better damage, but longer burst and better far penetration from Mg-42 make the difference.
M-42 is strange, low price, very low penetration, low damage, it is okeish vs halftracks and even infantry, but I would gladly spend some more MP, like 40-60, for penetration buff, something like 120/100/80.
Tanktraps are kinda useless - map dependent and you need a lot of time to build them like tank blocker, its very rare tool. The are good like small green cover, common US tactic, but SU already have sandbags on conscripts.
Posts: 632 | Subs: 1
Then you'd have a fairly decent commander that could work well with a T1 build.
Posts: 640
Posts: 344
Posts: 558 | Subs: 1
This commander really needs an overhaul. I think tank traps and AI mines should be combined into one ability that comes at 0CP, then they could add something else, maybe Incendiary Artillery - that would fit pretty well. The DshK should come at 1CP and its ability needs a slight buff. The M-42 needs higher penetration, and it could also come at 1CP.
Then you'd have a fairly decent commander that could work well with a T1 build.
thats a very nice idea!
Posts: 558 | Subs: 1
Posts: 297
Posts: 354
Posts: 304
USF can also build it straight away with REs... dont see the point why the are locked behind CPs.
that's the one of two useful things can be made by RE. RE itself is really bad now.
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
Add KV2.
Buff M42 (bit weaker than ZiS, but with better RoF and maybe AT/HE rounds).
Posts: 521
No more Dushka because of bunkers, no more M-42 because of TM-44, and the heavy mortar ain't that good anyway.
Posts: 2635 | Subs: 4
Permanently BannedPosts: 632 | Subs: 1
I reworked this doctrine a while back with my own ideas:
No more Dushka because of bunkers, no more M-42 because of TM-44, and the heavy mortar ain't that good anyway.
I'm assuming the TM-44 will be a Teller mine clone? Getting all that stuff at 0CP could be a bit strong, it also makes them very similar to Ostheer. The FHQ fits well, though. Cheap double LMGs on cheap mainline infantry could lead so some serious spam, I think a a single DP-28 that's available earlier would be better. The KV-1 is pretty bad at the moment, but if it gets a buff it would definitely be nice to see it in other commanders. The IL-2 loiter is also pretty nice, although it doesn't fit the 'defensive' theme so much.
I really like this concept - great work! Although it's a bit of a shame that it doesn't incorporate the DShK and M-42. They're obviously not great at the moment, but I'd really like to see them buffed and available in more commanders.
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
Posts: 521
I'm assuming the TM-44 will be a Teller mine clone? Getting all that stuff at 0CP could be a bit strong, it also makes them very similar to Ostheer. The FHQ fits well, though. Cheap double LMGs on cheap mainline infantry could lead so some serious spam, I think a a single DP-28 that's available earlier would be better. The KV-1 is pretty bad at the moment, but if it gets a buff it would definitely be nice to see it in other commanders. The IL-2 loiter is also pretty nice, although it doesn't fit the 'defensive' theme so much.
I really like this concept - great work! Although it's a bit of a shame that it doesn't incorporate the DShK and M-42. They're obviously not great at the moment, but I'd really like to see them buffed and available in more commanders.
- Yeah, TM-44 will be Teller mine clone. Maybe make it 70 munitions to place.
- Remember, DP-28s are the weakest LMGs in the game. Plus, they come at 5 CP, much later than other LMGs.
- I was thinking the IL-2 loiter could serve as way to defend an area. It could be replaced by an 2 CP DShK I suppose.
Posts: 632 | Subs: 1
I know DPs are weak, but they only cost 75 munitions, at least on Guards. If you give them to a squad that's cheap to build and reinforce, it would be fairly easy to get a huge LMG blob of doom that can build cover, sprint, clear garrisons and snare vehicles. But I guess this just needs to be tested in game!
Now that loitering planes can't spot for themselves any more, it might be nice to make some kind of "Sector Air Defense" ability: Targeted owned sector will be revealed by flares, two IL-2 will loiter and attack enemy units in that sector for a while.
Posts: 1890 | Subs: 1
This commander really needs an overhaul. I think tank traps and AI mines should be combined into one ability that comes at 0CP, then they could add something else, maybe Incendiary Artillery - that would fit pretty well. The DshK should come at 1CP and its ability needs a slight buff. The M-42 needs higher penetration, and it could also come at 1CP.
Then you'd have a fairly decent commander that could work well with a T1 build.
Booby Trap Territory would be great add to the doctrine thematically.
1 CP is kind of early for the M-42 as you need to allow some window of usability for Axis light vehicles before a hard counter is available. DSHK maybe... you can argue that MG34 comes at 1 CP (although it's not nearly as good damage wise so DSHK might be better at 2 CP as well). The AP Rounds could use a slight buff I agree since they are a joke compared to Incendiary Rounds while also being more expensive if I'm not mistaken.
Posts: 632 | Subs: 1
The DShK should come at 1CP, though. It can be fairly strong, but at 300MP it's also the most expensive HMG in the game, so you can't really spam it.
Both AP abilities cost 15 munitions, but the one the MG42 has is much, much better. It doubles damage (to 8) and multiplies penetration by NINE (19.8/16.2/12.6), while the DShK only gets triple penetration (13.5/9/4.5). It does have higher stock damage (10), but the MG42's rate of fire is twice as high. I would recommend a higher penetration modifier for the DShK's ability, that way it would be more reliable against vehicles without completely obliterating infantry. It could also be locked behind Vet 1 in that case - or the buff to the AP rounds could come at Vet 1 - so that the DShK doesn't completely shut down light vehicles when it comes out.
Posts: 2070
They should add posibility to build soviet bunkers (they are now at base as defence stuctures) at this doctrine and maybe a KV-2 as call in. It needs an overhaul for sure, now it's the weakest commander.
sounds like a good suggestion
Livestreams
111 | |||||
27 | |||||
13 | |||||
63 | |||||
61 | |||||
13 | |||||
8 | |||||
1 | |||||
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.829222.789+35
- 2.34857.859+13
- 3.587233.716+3
- 4.1095612.641+19
- 5.882398.689+4
- 6.280162.633+8
- 7.996646.607-1
- 8.379114.769+1
- 9.300113.726-1
- 10.717439.620+1
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger