Posts: 17889 | Subs: 8
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
1 
Posts: 2885
Posts: 17889 | Subs: 8
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
4 
Posts: 3548 | Subs: 2
Posts: 3293
Failure is always an option. 
It's a happy massacre?! (yes, yes it is!)
Caffeine illegal for WiFi's to ingest in 48 states, 2 colonies, and 1 providences. 
To make most awesome thing in universe combine Bears and Nicholas Cage! 
and remember kids, we didn't start the flame-war!
Posts: 721
Posts: 923
I'm never into these discussions as they don't really interest me, but with this new info (i read for a while, although not all of the summaries) in ligth, stuff becomes hard to explain.
So the allied tanks were matching all-in-all. Even the French. And Soviet optics were World class. And the German Aces figures are loads inflated.
But still the tank casualties for Allies compared to Germany were staggering. Due to sheer incompetence of allied crews then? How do the tank aces not have a great ratio when the ratio of allied tanks to German tanks were so uneven? Hah! "Maths" *sneer*. Maybe the ratios are not correct and Soviets had actually less tanks. Because Soviet did not have as much people as claimed, just big country geographics. They did have a big geographics didn't they? And very cold snow?
It's all so confusing.
Posts: 142
I'm never into these discussions as they don't really interest me, but with this new info (i read for a while, although not all of the summaries) in ligth, stuff becomes hard to explain.
So the allied tanks were matching all-in-all. Even the French. And Soviet optics were World class. And the German Aces figures are loads inflated.
But still the tank casualties for Allies compared to Germany were staggering. Due to sheer incompetence of allied crews then? How do the tank aces not have a great ratio when the ratio of allied tanks to German tanks were so uneven? Hah! "Maths" *sneer*. Maybe the ratios are not correct and Soviets had actually less tanks. Because Soviet did not have as much people as claimed, just big country geographics. They did have a big geographics didn't they? And very cold snow?
It's all so confusing.
Posts: 721
I think your understanding of English is equally poor to your writing.
Posts: 1042
Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1
Posts: 559
SS asked me to do this, and The_Chieftain (WGA’s historian) put in his corrections into the list, as well as various posters of the World of Tanks NA forums.
Posts: 1637
I shared that on the forum Months ago! But here is another youll like:The PTRS's are fine as they are. Whenever i'm up against Guard Infantry, I always have to be careful with my vehicles or the Guards will completely destroy them. Good range, good damage and fairly cheap; if anything, the PTRS should nerfed since it's ridiculously good for the price. Even in the hands of Conscripts, the PTRS's are extremely potent.
Posts: 476
Posts: 142
YOU LATE Katitof
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equipment_losses_in_World_War_II
HRMMMM in the entire war the US lost 20,000 tanks in ALL Theaters hmmmmmmmmm.Brits? The SAME! GASP! I detect a Myth about terrible US tanks...seeing as yknow they lost just as many as the Brits and thats 20K total not just Shermans I am sure they are a small percentage of those losses. Lets just not bring up how many the Soviets lost...
Posts: 1637
Where's the credit for the German air forces, anti tank gun crew, panzerscherck, panzerfaust and... mines?
I am trying to get my hands on a copy for a reasonable price. Or find it in a library.The PTRS's are fine as they are. Whenever i'm up against Guard Infantry, I always have to be careful with my vehicles or the Guards will completely destroy them. Good range, good damage and fairly cheap; if anything, the PTRS should nerfed since it's ridiculously good for the price. Even in the hands of Conscripts, the PTRS's are extremely potent.
Posts: 1702
14 
Posts: 10665 | Subs: 9
Posts: 721
Germans were the best, that is why they won the war, right?
Posts: 862
To be fair, they were one nation fighting everybody else on multiple fronts. I'm not hailing nazis.
 |
|
|
58 | ||
 |
|
|
18 | ||
|
|
|
|
4 | ||
 |
|
|
49 | ||
|
|
|
|
34 | ||
 |
|
|
33 | ||
 |
|
|
23 | ||
|
|
|
|
8 | ||
|
|
|
|
6 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
