RIP Flame Halftrack

New topic

New Reply

Posts: 3293

4 Apr 2014, 14:46 PMCieZ

It is still a fine upgrade even mid/gate game to protect your MGs/PaK4s from shock/con flanks.

Also, it is more lethal this patch - way too lethal to come as early as it used to.

+1

@RAZ: so because its not blatantly OP its useless?

222 and grens are to good/OP so its not worth the investment.

also BIASED POLE!!!

cmon man...

Failure is always an option.

It's a happy massacre?! (yes, yes it is!)

Caffeine illegal for WiFi's to ingest in 48 states, 2 colonies, and 1 providences.

To make most awesome thing in universe combine Bears and Nicholas Cage!

and remember kids, we didn't start the flame-war!

Multi Quote

Posts: 878

Yeah, there were no changes to it in DPS. But there seem to be hidden vet changes, I have pulled it out once or twice in team games and it is definitely vetting faster. At Vet 2 it becomes quite scary.

Posts: 449

Why build a halftrack when you can build another gren?

Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

4 Apr 2014, 16:47 PM5trategos

Why build a halftrack when you can build another gren?

You may want to reinforce your other grens!!

My controls weren't working
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.

Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.

Multi Quote

Posts: 978

I don´t think it´s underperforming. I neither faced a flame HT nor built a flame HT since the latest patch.

It just comes too late. At that point (Tier 3) you are usually better off with Schrecks as Germans.

Posts: 449

4 Apr 2014, 16:57 PMelchino7

You may want to reinforce your other grens!!

When you have 8 squads of 'em, there is no need to reinforce on the field. Just retreat the few that are low and fill in the holes with the rest. Rinse, repeat.

Posts: 219

I haven't really needed it since last patch. And for protecting support weapons it's just to much of an investment for such a fragile unit. There are other units available that do job, and they are cheaper...

Posts: 60

Seems kind of late at T3, if you intend to use it in the same role as past patches. If they're determined to keep it at T3, then I think they should lower the munitions cost, its just way too vulnerable at that point in the game to justify 120 munitions.

Posts: 786

who needs it when you have unkillables 222s...

Posts: 589

built maybe one, hard to get them now with the tech requirement.. I'd say they need a looksee

Posts: 829

Its still good unit, no one builds FHT because why build it when you can build sc222? comes earlier, great killing power and cheaper investment.
I still see HT, but mainly for reinforcing and quick troop transport .

Posts: 644

4 Apr 2014, 16:57 PMelchino7

You may want to reinforce your other grens!!

reinforcing is vCoH meta, adapt.

Posts: 17892 | Subs: 8

5 Apr 2014, 20:01 PMraw

reinforcing is vCoH meta, adapt.

And I thought vCoH meta was nazi zombie army?

25 Nov 2015, 11:09 AM$nuffy

Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.

Good Stuff here

Multi Quote