YES!!!!
Soviets and America fought together against hitler.
even if they fought on different Places.
Poll: USA + Soviets in one team?
30 Mar 2014, 03:03 AM
#41
Posts: 160
Aka Danny
30 Mar 2014, 03:13 AM
#42
Posts: 934
Hell yes.
I don't care much of historical accuracy. As long as I get my BAR riflemen I am forever happy in CoH2. After all, they are different fronts but the allies/axis share the same objectives.
I don't care much of historical accuracy. As long as I get my BAR riflemen I am forever happy in CoH2. After all, they are different fronts but the allies/axis share the same objectives.
30 Mar 2014, 04:24 AM
#43
Posts: 1042
I'm actually considering ignoring the US and specialising in the OKW, I think there will be a lot of interesting things coming for it...
30 Mar 2014, 06:26 AM
#44
Posts: 1702
you guys seem to forget that japan did not really need tanks. Japan mostly fought in a jungle enviroment where it is very hard to use tanks because of no roads/ jungle everywhere/and close quarters combat due to trees being everywhere.
When you are that close even a shitty 47 mm gun can do the trick. And no amount armor is going to save you.
Japan had superior planes than USA, and a pretty good navy, and those are the important things when you are fighting in the pacific.
When you are that close even a shitty 47 mm gun can do the trick. And no amount armor is going to save you.
Japan had superior planes than USA, and a pretty good navy, and those are the important things when you are fighting in the pacific.
30 Mar 2014, 07:46 AM
#45
Posts: 2779
Soviet con spam supported by 30 cal machine guns with the same arc as MG 42, Oh yes!
Or stronger Rifles support by instant-suppress maxim?
30 Mar 2014, 07:48 AM
#46
Posts: 2779
you guys seem to forget that japan did not really need tanks. Japan mostly fought in a jungle enviroment where it is very hard to use tanks because of no roads/ jungle everywhere/and close quarters combat due to trees being everywhere.
When you are that close even a shitty 47 mm gun can do the trick. And no amount armor is going to save you.
Japan had superior planes than USA, and a pretty good navy, and those are the important things when you are fighting in the pacific.
Just because they have shitty tanks, Panzer can be stopped by forest? said the French
30 Mar 2014, 08:21 AM
#47
Posts: 589
yes. I like the idea of the strategic opportunities afforded by mixed teams. Its fun! I don't care if its not accurate tbh. It's multiplayer- there is no story attached.
30 Mar 2014, 08:31 AM
#48
Posts: 1702
im fine with mixed factions as long as they include a button to not have sovs + americans in one team.
30 Mar 2014, 08:59 AM
#49
Posts: 2779
im fine with mixed factions as long as they include a button to not have sovs + americans in one team.
What are you talking about? You want air to be colourless but make a God button changed air into red colour?
30 Mar 2014, 09:03 AM
#50
Posts: 1702
What are you talking about? You want air to be colourless but make a God button changed air into red colour?
Well the have map veto, why can't we have faction veto?
30 Mar 2014, 09:19 AM
#51
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Well the have map veto, why can't we have faction veto?
Because in competitive game you won't be able to choose your opponent.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
30 Mar 2014, 09:26 AM
#52
Posts: 2779
Well the have map veto, why can't we have faction veto?
If this exist in vCOH, Brit = removed because no one want playing against their Roos (2.601) and Faghounds (2.602)
30 Mar 2014, 09:26 AM
#53
Posts: 2693 | Subs: 1
Because in competitive game you won't be able to choose your opponent.
I can already do that now.
30 Mar 2014, 09:49 AM
#54
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
I can already do that now.
Custom games aren't competitive unless you play tournaments/player of equal skill.
I'm talking automatch.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
30 Mar 2014, 09:52 AM
#55
Posts: 2693 | Subs: 1
Custom games aren't competitive unless you play tournaments/player of equal skill.
I'm talking automatch.
Me too, I can already play exlusively against the soviets or germans in automatch.
30 Mar 2014, 09:56 AM
#56
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
Or he can just quit
My controls weren't working
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.
Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.
Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.
30 Mar 2014, 10:05 AM
#57
Posts: 133
It's funny how some people make it look like CoH2.org's general opinion on the unrealistic teamgames issue is that it should not be in the game by posting their opinion 5 times in every single thread about this topic and the poll clearly shows thats most people do not have a problem with USA+Soviet matchups.
An option to choose if you want to play unrealistic battles is a horrible idea. It would split the playerbase and make automatch less competitive. In which competitive game are you able to choose your opponent ???
An option to choose if you want to play unrealistic battles is a horrible idea. It would split the playerbase and make automatch less competitive. In which competitive game are you able to choose your opponent ???
30 Mar 2014, 10:35 AM
#58
Posts: 1042
Okay... so I don't want any players using elite troops... or OPel blitzes... or panzergrenadiers as my opponent, why do I get a button stop that? Thanks. 
30 Mar 2014, 11:25 AM
#59
Posts: 2693 | Subs: 1
An option to choose if you want to play unrealistic battles is a horrible idea. It would split the playerbase and make automatch less competitive. In which competitive game are you able to choose your opponent ???
In which other competitive game do allies only fight against axis?
If you think the competitive aspect is so damn important for everyone, then why are there no topics opening every day asking for mirror matches?
30 Mar 2014, 11:37 AM
#60
Posts: 133
In which other competitive game do allies only fight against axis?
If you think the competitive aspect is so damn important for everyone, then why are there no topics opening every day asking for mirror matches?
because the community that dreams of a competitive coh2 scene (coh2.org) doesn't want them. Mirror matches in coh2 aren't the same as mirrors in sc, I played mirrors against friends and i swear the games become boring as hell. However this poll clearly shows that most people on CoH2.org which is the core community want US+Soviet Matchups so your argument doesn't make sense at all.
Edit: Btw you're one of these guys I was talking about. I guess everyone has recognized that you're not a fan of the "faction mash up" so why do you keep making shittons of posts about it ?
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
119 | ||
 |
|
|
37 | ||
|
|
|
|
61 | ||
 |
|
|
52 | ||
 |
|
|
13 | ||
|
|
|
|
7 | ||
|
|
|
|
3 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.829222.789+35
- 2.34857.859+13
- 3.587233.716+3
- 4.1095612.641+19
- 5.882398.689+4
- 6.280162.633+8
- 7.996646.607-1
- 8.379114.769+1
- 9.300113.726-1
- 10.717439.620+1
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
999