Posts: 2458 | Subs: 1
A valid argument is also that the raketen released with the worst range of any AT gun in the game, and had the retreat option because it had to expose itself compared to other AT guns, but now it has been buffed to match other AT guns. Should be updated.
Posts: 403
Yes when they become Pak 40 clones in terms of stats. Otherwise Raks would be complete garbage. They are already worse than regular AT-guns as it is and at the same time more expensive than USF M1.
My place in the ladder is irrelevant as long as I am matched with opponents of the same rank and play all factions (balance at place 1000+ is no different from balance in top 100 if we consider what I said before the brakets) so I don't care about your assertion which is also irrelevant.
Posts: 2458 | Subs: 1
It already is a PAK 40 clone with the only difference of having 10 less range, which is really insignificant considering it is way easier to move and rotate than towed AT guns.
Posts: 4474
?????
A valid argument is also that the raketen released with the worst range of any AT gun in the game, and had the retreat option because it had to expose itself compared to other AT guns, but now it has been buffed to match other AT guns. Should be updated.
Katitof-2018
Posts: 2458 | Subs: 1
?????
Posts: 403
God please look up the stats before saying stuff like this.
My place in the ladder is irrelevant as long as I am matched with opponents of the same rank and play all factions (balance at place 1000+ is no different from balance in top 100 if we consider what I said before the brakets) so I don't care about your assertion which is also irrelevant.
Posts: 4183 | Subs: 4
Literally 10 less range and 10 less penetration.
Prove me wrong.
Posts: 214
Literally 10 less range and 10 less penetration.
Prove me wrong.
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1
They are already worse than regular AT-guns as it is and at the same time more expensive than USF M1.
Posts: 2458 | Subs: 1
Literally 10 less range and 10 less penetration.
Prove me wrong.
Posts: 4474
Katitof-2018
Posts: 2458 | Subs: 1
Lol no it isn't. US m1 is only better after spending 30 Muni? And it's in a 35 fuel tier?
Posts: 2458 | Subs: 1
@blvck, 5 man. Other than that though you still can't wipe it without rocket arty as USF.
Posts: 3166 | Subs: 6
Literally 10 less range and 10 less penetration.
Prove me wrong.
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1
Rak is 290. M1 is 270. OKW tech is overall not cheaper than USF tech so the tier argument is completely meaningless.
Yes M1 costs more muni. But it also has 10x better stats than the Raketenwerfer when muni is used. Including around 66 range, self spotting, insane ROF, etc.
Posts: 403
Yes when they become Pak 40 clones in terms of stats. Otherwise Raks would be complete garbage. They are already worse than regular AT-guns as it is and at the same time more expensive than USF M1.
ok
Raketenwerfer
55 range
200-190-180 pen
0.25-0.38 fire aim time
0.13 ready aim time
reload 3.8-4.3
Pak 40
60 range
210-200-190 penetration
0.13-0.25 fire aim time
0.13 ready aim time
reload 3.5-4.1
My place in the ladder is irrelevant as long as I am matched with opponents of the same rank and play all factions (balance at place 1000+ is no different from balance in top 100 if we consider what I said before the brakets) so I don't care about your assertion which is also irrelevant.
Posts: 2458 | Subs: 1
My bad, forgot they got even more buffed to become more streamlined AT gun.
You have done anything but proved me wrong, it's even better than what I said.
The Raketten has 55 range, the Pak 40 has 60;
It has 200/190/180 pen as opposed to 210/200/190, but at lower ranges, so technically even worse;
It has slightly worse accuracy than the Pak 40 for the same reason;
It doesn't have a gunshield, and even though gunshields don't function properly they do offer additional protection in some situations. Though the extra crewmember is supposed to compensate this;
Reload is 0.12s slower, but practically negligible;
Its gun traverse is better than the Pak 40 at -35/35 vs -30/30;
Pak 40 gets better veterancy bonuses, most importantly getting better penetration and faster reload.
Posts: 403
The Raketten has 55 range, the Pak 40 has 60;
It has 200/190/180 pen as opposed to 210/200/190, but at lower ranges, so technically even worse;
It has slightly worse accuracy than the Pak 40 for the same reason;
It doesn't have a gunshield, and even though gunshields don't function properly they do offer additional protection in some situations. Though the extra crewmember is supposed to compensate this;
Reload is 0.12s slower, but practically negligible;
Its gun traverse is better than the Pak 40 at -35/35 vs -30/30;
Pak 40 gets better veterancy bonuses, most importantly getting better penetration and faster reload.
My place in the ladder is irrelevant as long as I am matched with opponents of the same rank and play all factions (balance at place 1000+ is no different from balance in top 100 if we consider what I said before the brakets) so I don't care about your assertion which is also irrelevant.
Posts: 2458 | Subs: 1
Uhh the fact that you get a Rak in your HQ no matter what but you only get 57mm after tech choice is most certainly not meaningless. What kind of statement is that?
I have said numerous times 57mm is the best AT gun. But saying it's cheaper is just nonsense. 20mp cheaper once vs. spending 30 Muni multiple times
And those bonus stats require muni too
 |
|
|
91 | ||
 |
|
|
28 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
63 | ||
|
|
|
|
53 | ||
|
|
|
|
11 | ||
 |
|
|
7 | ||
 |
|
|
1 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
