No, those dont affect that stat relationship between T34 and PIV AI, at all.
I dont understand why you are talking about charging a tank frontally. Why would you do that?
Move out of LoS, and nade it if it overextends.
The point of AtNading/Fausting a tank, is to disable it to prevent it pushing, or to enable your hard AT to deal with it.
The Nade/Faust dmg itself is not sufficient, and doesnt count as hard AT.
I dont get your point.
Can you please repeat it in a clear and concise statement?
Ohhh, thats why I hate when people barge into lengthy conversation and pick single sentence out of it. (not saying it was you, someone else did it)
ok short version of what I understood from poster:
Previously was suggested that I should chase/oorah my way to scout car and plaster it with AT nade as sound tactic, and Oorah my way to the Piv that is supported by PG's, and you can cap points with conscripts because they can use oorah, thus moving faster (I presume)
what I said:
You cannot AT nade scout car, only promote it. so conscripts are useless
-You WILL suffer high losses with low possibility attempting to AT nade damage Piv engine. Semi-useless
-you can cap points with conscripts late game but eng are much better option to have: you can have flame, mine sweeper (mind you, some people actually mine their points as defensive measure) plus you can reapair and build stuff. Why would you chose conscripts?
So yeah Conscripts are semi-useless and rifle grens and eng are much more versatile combo to have
And I was told this:
even if other infantry is guarding the tanks ( which is how a good player should operate anyways ) the conscripts have enough men to throw an at nade and run out of there before the squad gets wipedand something about if I fail to win in that scenario, its because German player had giant blob of PG's and commited more units than I did
and this
teller mines does not detonate on infantry, and s-mines are just a waste
(part of the argument is which unit is more useful to spend MP in mid-late game, if choosing)
To me that means I can run up to the Piv that is supported by PG's, stick an AT nade on it and run away before squad gets wiped?
So I responded with answer, of which, a part was "Piv will one shot 3-4 conscripts"
"I just don't see benefit in that (Oorah-ing your way to Piv). For me they die to fast in mid-late game, and even tho they are cheap they drain MP overall. (one Piv round kills 3-4 instantly, before you say WTF you got your self vet2 Piv to deal with)"
In context it means exactly what you said. WTF!!! why on earth would you even suggest oorah-ing your way onto Piv that is on top of being Piv, supported by PG's. That Piv is gonna rip you to bits. All you gonna do is drain your MP and have yourself vet2 PIV in no time....
(P.S. since I play 4v4's as well, i see a lot of that, so yeah Oorah-ing your way to Piv on road, it will drive backwards and waste 3-4 conscripts with one shot on road..
I hope that makes little more sense because its a lot of copy paste and trying to compress few lengthy posts, but I cant be bothered explaining anymore,
2 P.S. I asked question that I don't see how he logically concluded that t34 will wipe out entire squad as sarcastic remark, since he pulled one sentence out of lengthy convestation