Profile of zarok47

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 587

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/Zarok47
Steam: 76561198007472278


Thread: What to do with the MG34?18 Aug 2015, 16:41 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Aug 2015, 16:34 PMcomm_ash WTF? I would think that the .50 should be doing either more damage or more suppression. This is kind of bullshit. Especially since it hits the field so much later. Don't compare the MG34's effectiveness to that of the MG42. The MG42 is definitely overperforming for cost. Diffrence in DPS can be attribute to difference in sqaudsizes. Overperforming for cost tho, is something i wil not argue against. Just my nitpicking 2 cents. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Breaking holy vow of not playing randumbs9 Aug 2015, 09:18 AM Jump back to quoted post8 Aug 2015, 14:28 PMKatitof Can't really expect much of randumb games. We all know how they can go. Rank will improve, but my BO(of not rushing to T4 and sticking to med truck for longer time) won't change, had they been more aggressive I'd go for luftwaffe for MG34 and maybe falls instead of super late obers. Principle stands though, JP4 pretty much hardcounters sov T3, M5 won't harass you long if you won't lose map control early. But sure, we can do some 2s together if you want. My current 2v2 mate(we've been top 100 for both sides with 54 being our best rank in the past) pretty much went inactive, so why not. Good, ill find you on steam In: Replays
Thread: Breaking holy vow of not playing randumbs8 Aug 2015, 13:53 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Aug 2015, 13:39 PMvasa1719 Imo all player have there personal skill/level (how thay know game, control, how thay are fast), so you vs Katitof i think its be 49 from 50 its be you win (becouse different skill (ofc if you will be not 2 merica or 2 OKW ). Try to show m5 rush vs you player level. I wouldn't be so sure that i would win vs him in a 2vs2, lots of things depends on teammates, maps etc. But even if there is a skill difference, one can still see how powerfull the M5 can be. Besides, if he plays as my 2vs2 partner, there would be no problem of different skill. Anyways, i look for a replay of me rushing an m5 vs en equally skilled team/player. Tho im not sure either what exactly that skill would be. In: Replays
Thread: How to deal with M1919 and Defensive stance?8 Aug 2015, 13:18 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Aug 2015, 13:13 PMkamk That is correct. But you will keep him from using it, and you can still crush "the normal way", not? The other options have already been mentioned. I suppose you can use crush that way, but i never am a fan of driving tanks into at nade range. Still, any port in a storm, ill be sure to remember this. In: OKW Strategies
Thread: How to deal with M1919 and Defensive stance?8 Aug 2015, 13:05 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Aug 2015, 02:45 AMkamk Have you tried crushing yet? (defensive stanced units can't evade tanks) Not a fan of MG34s & ISG? Semoisky winter or summer? Replay would certainly help. Sounds like you lost early game too easily, and then you could never recover. Defensive stance can be near immediatly cancelled now, so crushing is a no go. In: OKW Strategies
Thread: Breaking holy vow of not playing randumbs8 Aug 2015, 13:04 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Aug 2015, 11:50 AMKatitof So, due to absence of my AT partner I've broken my personal rule and started playing RT games. This is last OKW placement one. M5 ans Su-76 sooo scary. #adapt Randoms OkW on minsk pocket, whilst your rank after 10 games is only 500, not mentioning the ranks of the other players. Not exactly a good basis to say something regarding the M5 and the su-76 if you ask me. Would you be interested in a 2vs2 with/against me? I think i can show you just how scary the m5 (and to a lesser extent, the su-76) can be. In: Replays
Thread: How to deal with M1919 and Defensive stance?5 Aug 2015, 15:47 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Aug 2015, 15:01 PMBryan Is this ability for USF bugged btw? I seem to recall you previously could not run into combat and hit the deck, where now you can. It used to be that you had to be out of combat before activiting the ability and you had some sort of cooldown on turning it off. Now it's so bugged that you don't have the cooldown and out of combat requirement. You can run into combat, active and wait for nade, deactive and dodge said nade. It's utterly, utterly broken. In: OKW Strategies
Thread: Revisit the ISU-152 changes?2 Aug 2015, 15:29 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Aug 2015, 10:20 AMAustralian Magic It may be powerful, but very, very often shells cannot reach infantry because they end up in the ground somewhere in the middle. Not saying it's a problem - just saying it's not alaways possible to use it efficiently on each map. Countering it as Ostheer? Many ways to go... Elephnat (2 great doctrines), Pak43 (at least 1 very useful), CAS, Lightning - all work quite good agasint it. You can even try Panther/Stugs with sandbags since they increase range. The ISU not being usefull on certain maps strikes me as fine, seeing as most units aren't usefull on every map. Pak43 gets hardcountered by both ISU's commanders with 1 simple click (yee for great commander design) CAS (as in, the commander) gets hardcountered by ISU with micro, whislt panther and stugs with sandbags.... well at guns exist for a reason. Only elephant/JT can fight ISU on a semi-even terms and even then it takes a wopping 27 seconds of continuous fire from the ele/JT to kill the ISU. Plenty of time to gtfo. Without those units, ISU still wins games with a little at support. Don't buff it, it's fine. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: the cumback Kreygasm ( RtN hater )1 Aug 2015, 14:26 PM He has returned, the greatest player of our age Hope he streams again In: Replays
Thread: The way of the sturmtiger31 Jul 2015, 13:30 PM This is by far the craziest 1vs1 i've ever played, I.... i am at a lose for words here, just watch and see. I hope you enjoy it as much as i do . To give you a small hint (it's a minor spoiler): In: Replays