Posts: 1534 | Subs: 1
I skipped reading that because I don't agree. Unit recognition is something players will have to learn, just like tactics. I could distinguish a T34-85 from a T34-76 100/100 times at first glance.
And how is this any different from a comparison like the M4A3 Sherman and M4A3(76) Sherman?
Posts: 27
I skipped reading that because I don't agree. Unit recognition is something players will have to learn, just like tactics. I could distinguish a T34-85 from a T34-76 100/100 times at first glance.
And how is this any different from a comparison like the M4A3 Sherman and M4A3(76) Sherman?
Posts: 2272 | Subs: 1
Disagree, one of the best and most immersive features of ths game are its diverse looks. They should go even farther:
Tanks with sandbags, tanks with scratches and bullet holes,
soldiers with or without helmets, backpacks, coats or no coats, bandaids whatsoever. There should be an editor in which you can customize the appearance of your vehicles and squads (like in rocket league)
Relic missed a BIG opportunity there and could have maintained their reputation easily. I'm pretty sure people would have paid a lot of money for stuff like that
In MP games units must be easily recognisable. This was even one of Relics design mantras for the infantry and they should follow suit with vehicles as well.
The problem is here the basic shapes are far too similar.
1 Posts: 2439 | Subs: 6
Posts: 1534 | Subs: 1
for the 4v4 people, the biggest playerbase, the aesthetics would be very important, ask rosbone or a.soldier.
Also if you lose a game, it's surely not because you need half a second more to see what tank is on the screen at one moment a game
Posts: 3166 | Subs: 6
Those are commander dependant and on different factions.
Posts: 1534 | Subs: 1
No, the M4A3(76) I mean is the USF commander based vehicle. It's a 1:1 comparison with the T34-85 in both availability and its distinction compared to its mainline baby brother.
Posts: 2184 | Subs: 2
Posts: 1617
Posts: 4183 | Subs: 4
Posts: 493
Posts: 3166 | Subs: 6
You mean the easy8?
That is commander call in and imo is much easier to tell apart from the regular sherman, compared to the T34's
Posts: 2742
Posts: 587
Also if you lose a game, it's surely not because you need half a second more to see what tank is on the screen at one moment a game
Being bad at the game isn't something balance patches can fix.
Posts: 1534 | Subs: 1
No, I mean the 'reserve armor' ability of the mechanized commander that allows the USF to build M4A3(76) Sherman tanks at T3. That's the upgunned version that is literally an M4A3 clone with only the gun and mantlet being slightly different (while having an AT profile rather than AI).
Posts: 1534 | Subs: 1
We are hitting new levels of idiocracy.
While you are at it, please change all the sherman variants.
Oh....
AND REMOVE MERGE as you can have 6 con model fighting in Guard/Shock/Penal etc squad. My enemy won't be able to tell the difference.
This thread is a joke.
Posts: 1890 | Subs: 1
Posts: 935
Posts: 1304 | Subs: 13
Posts: 3260
 |
|
|
119 | ||
 |
|
|
37 | ||
|
|
|
|
61 | ||
 |
|
|
52 | ||
 |
|
|
13 | ||
|
|
|
|
7 | ||
|
|
|
|
3 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
