Panzerschreck Cost On Sturms

Jump back to quoted post22 Jun 2016, 23:53 PMVirtual Boar

To OP

Sturms are squishy and they should remain so. they are a t-0 unit that can win most engagements one on one against any other base infantry unit. So to further buff their already amazing early game combat power is an utterly ridiculous preposition.

The price might need some tweaking but it can't be cheap enough that we see a comeback of the retarded Attack move waffen ss ubermensch blob of doom.

Jump back to quoted post23 Jun 2016, 00:00 AMStug life

think are pg blob effective ? No so why should sturm blob be effective ?

Jump back to quoted post23 Jun 2016, 00:05 AMVirtual Boar

That isn't a good argument for price decrease. Different nations have different attributes. People bitch and moan about panzershrek being super costly but i don't see anyone bating an eyelid at UKF's infantry's section useless and costly gammon bomb or the cheap but useless PIAT.

Jump back to quoted post23 Jun 2016, 00:08 AMStug life

useless piat if you don't attack ground or use them on light vehicle gamon is good think about it same as penal satchels with the added bonus of stunning tank and dealing high damage
Btw panzer sherck cost 60 each why should they cost 90 on sturm would it be fair if piat costed more for Sapper or bazoka for RE

Jump back to quoted post23 Jun 2016, 00:05 AMVirtual Boar

That isn't a good argument for price decrease. Different nations have different attributes. People bitch and moan about panzershrek being super costly but i don't see anyone bating an eyelid at UKF's infantry's section useless and costly gammon bomb or the cheap but useless PIAT.

Jump back to quoted post23 Jun 2016, 00:24 AMVirtual Boar

PIAT is garbage and and even a vehicle with damaged tracks can steer clear out of the way of gammon bomb. You don't have to have "fair" pricing, the price should be made when thinking of the pro's and con's of the specific faction, not by the other factions.

The point is flying over your head and you are also making excuses, the price might need tweaking, but not for the reasons you cite.

Jump back to quoted post23 Jun 2016, 11:17 AMTheMachine

I still think a double shrek upgrade for 120 would be better on Obers, this gives better late game anti tank destroyer potential.

Jump back to quoted post23 Jun 2016, 12:31 PMNEVEC

+1

But OKW have more problems with allied light vechiles than with late game tanks.

So relic do something idk what, as always.

Jump back to quoted post22 Jun 2016, 23:53 PMVirtual Boar

To OP

Sturms are squishy and they should remain so. they are a t-0 unit that can win most engagements one on one against any other base infantry unit. So to further buff their already amazing early game combat power is an utterly ridiculous preposition.

The price might need some tweaking but it can't be cheap enough that we see a comeback of the retarded Attack move waffen ss ubermensch blob of doom.

Jump back to quoted post23 Jun 2016, 11:11 AMZyllen

But everything is starting to look rather lopsidedly in ostheer favour. better and cheaper shreks better AT gun stugs etc etc.

Jump back to quoted post23 Jun 2016, 13:19 PMsinthe

Attack move is USFs new meta.

Jump back to quoted post23 Jun 2016, 13:23 PMVuther

Waaaaaaaaaaaiiiiitt a minute, what did anyone complain about USF before exactly?

Jump back to quoted post23 Jun 2016, 13:22 PMsinthe

Have you played Ostheer?

Jump back to quoted post23 Jun 2016, 13:24 PMsinthe

Was it Blobbing maybe?

Jump back to quoted post23 Jun 2016, 13:32 PMVuther

But the blobs didn't attack-move?

Jump back to quoted post23 Jun 2016, 14:00 PMEtherealDragon

+1 to Shrek cost being reduced... on a side note does anyone feel like the StrumPio aim time with Shrek is god awful compared to what Volks used to be like? Any time I've used them it feels like they take for-ev-er to shoot. (Maybe that's because the shrek model is more likely to be sniped?)