I have a question on how the 2 or 3% harder to hit bulletins affect recieved accuracy modifiers.
Say a 2% harder to hit bulletin for a panzergrenadier which has .87 rec accuracy.Will 2% means it becomes .85 RE?
Does it affect RE gained from veterancy in the same manner?Same question for 3% hader to hit paras.
Question on % harder to hit bulletin.
17 Nov 2015, 00:06 AM
#1
Posts: 1705
17 Nov 2015, 00:26 AM
#2
Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1
I'm pretty sure they're all multiplicative.
17 Nov 2015, 00:35 AM
#3
Posts: 1705
I'm pretty sure they're all multiplicative.
If they were multiplicative,how much would that make say a pzgren with 2% bulletin on top of inherent .87 re?
17 Nov 2015, 01:08 AM
#4
Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1
If they were multiplicative,how much would that make say a pzgren with 2% bulletin on top of inherent .87 re?
Just 0.87 X 0.98 = 0.826
17 Nov 2015, 01:20 AM
#5
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
Example: 0.87*0.97
Now, regarding PG, IIRC it's 0.8
Now, i couldn't find the base receive accuracy on files, but i did find this
I don't have/know the whole DPS formula accounting for stats of target but i assume it's just the same as receive accuracy.
0.73 if you stack three 3% harder to hit bulletins.
Vet2 without bulletins: 0.568
Vet2 with bulletins: 0.518
Now, regarding PG, IIRC it's 0.8
We wanted to better establish the mid-range role of this unit. We lowered its short range damage output and increased its mid range performance. Additionally, we further increased its durability to reduce damage received on approach.
Received accuracy modifier from 0.87 to 0.8
Now, i couldn't find the base receive accuracy on files, but i did find this
target_size: 0.8f;
I don't have/know the whole DPS formula accounting for stats of target but i assume it's just the same as receive accuracy.
0.73 if you stack three 3% harder to hit bulletins.
Vet2 without bulletins: 0.568
Vet2 with bulletins: 0.518
My controls weren't working
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.
Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.
Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.
17 Nov 2015, 03:19 AM
#6
4 Posts: 474
Example: 0.87*0.97
Now, regarding PG, IIRC it's 0.8
Now, i couldn't find the base receive accuracy on files, but i did find this
I don't have/know the whole DPS formula accounting for stats of target but i assume it's just the same as receive accuracy.
0.73 if you stack three 3% harder to hit bulletins.
Vet2 without bulletins: 0.568
Vet2 with bulletins: 0.518
They are .040 percent harder hit? My god, why haven't I abused my triple ostruppen harder to hit bulletins!
17 Nov 2015, 03:30 AM
#7
Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1
They are .040 percent harder hit? My god, why haven't I abused my triple ostruppen harder to hit bulletins!
I heard the effective health of Osttruppen goes up a ton from vetting considering their six men, might be even more effective than you expected!
17 Nov 2015, 06:21 AM
#8
8 Posts: 2470
stuff
correct, target size is received accuracy.
They are .040 percent harder hit? My god, why haven't I abused my triple ostruppen harder to hit bulletins!
not percent, just 0.04 or whatever.
17 Nov 2015, 07:08 AM
#9
4 Posts: 474
not percent, just 0.04 or whatever.
Writing from phone is hard work Kappa.jpg
17 Nov 2015, 07:10 AM
#10
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
Abusing triple harder to hit bulletin (with triple boost for sight - 9%)for Guards for a long long time 
But currently I prefer triple molotov bulletin. With vet 2 it's has better range than rifle nade
But currently I prefer triple molotov bulletin. With vet 2 it's has better range than rifle nade
17 Nov 2015, 15:16 PM
#11
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
correct, target size is received accuracy.
But was it always applied this way instead of how it's applied through veterancy?
My controls weren't working
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.
Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.
Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.
17 Nov 2015, 16:21 PM
#12
Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1
But was it always applied this way instead of how it's applied through veterancy?
Used to be infantry just had a target size of one and could have had a innate received accuracy modifier even without vet. They removed innate received accuracy modifiers and instead changed the infantry that had a received accuracy modifiers to have a different target size.
18 Nov 2015, 00:54 AM
#13
8 Posts: 2470
But was it always applied this way instead of how it's applied through veterancy?
i don't know; i don't know how the vet bonus works. i assumed it just made them smaller (lol) but from what you said it sounds like it may work differently?
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
92 | ||
 |
|
|
2 | ||
 |
|
|
100 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.279110.717+17
- 2.270144.652+2
- 3.558230.708+2
- 4.422.955+12
- 5.253150.628+14
- 6.29647.863+2
- 7.8120.802-1
- 8.19078.709+4
- 9.20387.700-1
- 10.399200.666+8
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
7
Download
793
Board Info
454 users are online:
454 guests
2 posts in the last 24h
33 posts in the last week
142 posts in the last month
33 posts in the last week
142 posts in the last month
Registered members: 45553
Welcome our newest member, Jerderfvfgg
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, Jerderfvfgg
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM