Cons. DPs. Do it.
How about we don't encourage more LMG spam meta.
No tech demo just poor design.
2 Jun 2015, 20:44 PM
#161
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
How about we don't encourage more LMG spam meta.
3 Jun 2015, 04:50 AM
#162
8 Posts: 2470
give cons multi-meltas to go along with their grenade.
3 Jun 2015, 04:55 AM
#163
Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1
give cons multi-meltas to go along with their grenade.
Valhallan Ice Warriors re-skins please
3 Jun 2015, 05:04 AM
#164
Posts: 197
Why not give the opposing player a subtle visual que that there has been a demo charged put down? I mean, nothing too obvious of course. Perhaps make it so that it's easier to detect on bare ground, but harder in grass etc. There could be a new texture added, a tiny one, that looks like Boris has been doing some digging and tried to cover up the hole the best he could with his hands.
I don't know, just brainstorming.
I don't know, just brainstorming.
3 Jun 2015, 08:16 AM
#165
Posts: 345
How about we don't encourage more LMG spam meta.
really funny you say this, in a demo thread where you already said you see OK giving demos to axis. You know....because we need to encourage more squad wippings....
see you AlexFAILvar.
An already muni starved faction (OKW) is now more muni starved and still can't build caches.
3 Jun 2015, 08:28 AM
#166
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
really funny you say this, in a demo thread where you already said you see OK giving demos to axis. You know....because we need to encourage more squad wippings....
see you AlexFAILvar.
I said I would prefer they are changed, but demo 1 shot meta is a lot less cancerous than LMG spam meta.
3 Jun 2015, 08:45 AM
#167
1 Posts: 440
How about we don't encourage more LMG spam meta.
Sigh, yes, let's not give anything to the bloody Russians . Fatherland forbids such favours to the Untermensch
3 Jun 2015, 08:49 AM
#168
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
Sigh, yes, let's not give anything to the bloody Russians . Fatherland forbids such favours to the Untermensch
I would be happy if every LMG was removed from the game. LMG spam meta is one of the reasons blobbing is so common and extending that to the USSR would just spread the cancer.
SvT's, PPsH43's, ect. There are tons of upgrades you could give to Conscripts and other Soviet squads without spreading LMG cancer meta.
3 Jun 2015, 08:52 AM
#169
1 Posts: 440
I would be happy if every LMG was removed from the game. LMG spam meta is one of the reasons blobbing is so common and extending that to the USSR would just spread the cancer.
SvT's, PPsH43's, ect. There are tons of upgrades you could give to Conscripts and other Soviet squads without spreading LMG cancer meta.
Yes, agreed, I would prefer a PPSH 43 upgrade. I think blobbing is common because it works. specially in 2v2s against those who spam support weapons like idiots.
3 Jun 2015, 15:54 PM
#170
Posts: 345
I would be happy if every LMG was removed from the game. LMG spam meta is one of the reasons blobbing is so common and extending that to the USSR would just spread the cancer.
SvT's, PPsH43's, ect. There are tons of upgrades you could give to Conscripts and other Soviet squads without spreading LMG cancer meta.
mmmm, so shame that when talking about DEMOS you want to spread the cancer giving demos to axis.....ohhhh mannnn!!! can´t you decide what is your opinion?????
should we remove all cancers from game?? or only the ones in Allies hands?????
hohohoho, can you stop spreading no-sense shit over every thread in this board?????
An already muni starved faction (OKW) is now more muni starved and still can't build caches.
3 Jun 2015, 17:36 PM
#171
1 
Posts: 2885
I would be happy if every LMG was removed from the game. LMG spam meta is one of the reasons blobbing is so common and extending that to the USSR would just spread the cancer.
SvT's, PPsH43's, ect. There are tons of upgrades you could give to Conscripts and other Soviet squads without spreading LMG cancer meta.
come on, you have never seen a flamer blob, a zook/shreck blob, g43 blob or even con blob? These are effective and they contain 0% of lmgs. Even if you left all the soldiers in game with only smgs blobs will still clash, just on a closer range. Actually the long ranged weapons are what makes positioning usefull in opposition to the blob.
4 Jun 2015, 09:14 AM
#172
1 Posts: 440
I would be happy if every LMG was removed from the game. LMG spam meta is one of the reasons blobbing is so common and extending that to the USSR would just spread the cancer.
SvT's, PPsH43's, ect. There are tons of upgrades you could give to Conscripts and other Soviet squads without spreading LMG cancer meta.
You do know that you need to stop to use LMGs properly. Except Obers, that's why they were such a pain last patch. So I don't think LMGs is that much of a 'cancer'
4 Jun 2015, 10:27 AM
#173
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
You do know that you need to stop to use LMGs properly. Except Obers, that's why they were such a pain last patch. So I don't think LMGs is that much of a 'cancer'
Have you seen 1919's on Para's and Riflemen?
come on, you have never seen a flamer blob, a zook/shreck blob, g43 blob or even con blob? These are effective and they contain 0% of lmgs. Even if you left all the soldiers in game with only smgs blobs will still clash, just on a closer range. Actually the long ranged weapons are what makes positioning usefull in opposition to the blob.
Except those Blobs are notably easier to counter than LMG blobs because the punishment for using LMG's in close range isn't very big at all. Hard to beat a blob you can't get close to, at all.
4 Jun 2015, 11:21 AM
#174
Posts: 345
Have you seen 1919's on Para's and Riflemen?
riflemen can´t use their LMG on the move.....
Again Alex writing wrong data, as usual.....there is no thread where this guy hadn´t thrown wrong data....
An already muni starved faction (OKW) is now more muni starved and still can't build caches.
4 Jun 2015, 11:40 AM
#175
Posts: 987
riflemen can´t use their LMG on the move.....
Again Alex writing wrong data, as usual.....there is no thread where this guy hadn´t thrown wrong data....
He didn't say they could fire on the move, you have misinterpreted him. He was replying to your denial of his statement about "LMG cancer".
So his statement "Have you seen 1919s on paras and riflemen" doesn't mean "they can shoot on the move" it means "they are (in his opinion) a real pain and spoil gameplay".
I hope I cleared that up. I think you're probably auto-disagreeing with what he says. I'm not saying he's right but if you want to have a constructive discussion with him, you'll have to at least understand and take on what he writes before writing "you're wrong".
Let's keep it constructive
4 Jun 2015, 11:58 AM
#176
Posts: 345
He didn't say they could fire on the move, you have misinterpreted him. He was replying to your denial of his statement about "LMG cancer".
So his statement "Have you seen 1919s on paras and riflemen" doesn't mean "they can shoot on the move" it means "they are (in his opinion) a real pain and spoil gameplay".
I hope I cleared that up. I think you're probably auto-disagreeing with what he says. I'm not saying he's right but if you want to have a constructive discussion with him, you'll have to at least understand and take on what he writes before writing "you're wrong".
Thanks for your explanation Bulgakov but, your are the one that is wrong here. Ale was answering other guy, not my post about what he said about COH2 cancers.....he was answering to KurtWilde comment, and of course he was saying that paras and riflemen can use their LMG on the move....aaaand if not, then, he should write his answer in a way that people don´t misinterpreted it, and I mean:
if someone says "You do know that you need to stop to use LMGs properly. Except Obers, that's why they were such a pain last patch. So I don't think LMGs is that much of a 'cancer'" and your answer is: "Have you seen 1919's on Para's and Riflemen?" then, 90% of us is going to interprete this answer as I did.
anyway, thanks for you attemp to get a constructive conversation, no joke.
An already muni starved faction (OKW) is now more muni starved and still can't build caches.
4 Jun 2015, 12:43 PM
#177
Posts: 987
Thanks for your explanation Bulgakov but, your are the one that is wrong here. Ale was answering other guy, not my post about what he said about COH2 cancers.....he was answering to KurtWilde comment, and of course he was saying that paras and riflemen can use their LMG on the move....aaaand if not, then, he should write his answer in a way that people don´t misinterpreted it, and I mean:
if someone says "You do know that you need to stop to use LMGs properly. Except Obers, that's why they were such a pain last patch. So I don't think LMGs is that much of a 'cancer'" and your answer is: "Have you seen 1919's on Para's and Riflemen?" then, 90% of us is going to interprete this answer as I did.
anyway, thanks for you attemp to get a constructive conversation, no joke.
Hmmm, seems convincing. I'm not entirely sure either way now but thanks for the decent reply. I'll leave you to it
Let's keep it constructive
4 Jun 2015, 12:52 PM
#178
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
The issue with LMG's is that there is no down side. When you have lots of PPsh's you can't do much at long range, that's a disadvantage, when you have lots of Shreks and Zooks you will be lacking for Anti infantry.
With LMG's you have superb long range DPS, and most of the units that can get LMG's have good short range DPS to. And on many maps there is so little cover you can't get into short range of the LMG units anyway.
This doesn't even touch on how broken and overpowered defensive stance is considering everyone uses it offensively
With LMG's you have superb long range DPS, and most of the units that can get LMG's have good short range DPS to. And on many maps there is so little cover you can't get into short range of the LMG units anyway.
This doesn't even touch on how broken and overpowered defensive stance is considering everyone uses it offensively
4 Jun 2015, 14:44 PM
#179
Posts: 2742
Penals need the DP-28 LMGs.
Strategic Territory Points Mod:
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=604491510
Classic resource points!
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=604491510
Classic resource points!
4 Jun 2015, 17:10 PM
#180
1 Posts: 440
Have you seen 1919's on Para's and Riflemen?
Riflemen can't fire 1919s on the move and Paras have like 20-25% accuracy. So they have to stop. A blob is more dangerous if they have ppshs, G 43s, etc
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
61 | ||
|
|
|
|
51 | ||
|
|
|
|
40 | ||
|
|
|
|
35 | ||
 |
|
|
31 | ||
 |
|
|
19 | ||
 |
|
|
17 | ||
|
|
|
|
14 | ||
|
|
|
|
3 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.968562.633+23
- 2.555227.710+11
- 3.29446.865-1
- 4.276110.715+14
- 5.259143.644+3
- 6.250150.625+11
- 7.22491.711+11
- 8.6512.844+3
- 9.250135.649+1
- 10.19265.747+5
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
7
Download
754
Board Info
2 posts in the last 24h
37 posts in the last week
137 posts in the last month
37 posts in the last week
137 posts in the last month
Registered members: 45064
Welcome our newest member, edmond2003s
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, edmond2003s
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM