Sure seem like a realistic and logical idea since there are personnel inside.
Veterancy for MG Nests
19 Mar 2015, 05:54 AM
#1
Posts: 9
19 Mar 2015, 06:08 AM
#2
7 
Posts: 1664
What would you have them gain on veterancy? I don't think defensive structures need any buffs.
19 Mar 2015, 06:14 AM
#3
Posts: 9
Inflict damage just like an M42 
19 Mar 2015, 06:16 AM
#4
Posts: 9
Forgot to mention Incendiary rounds/survival smoke grenade or something of this nature to be included in this process.
19 Mar 2015, 06:43 AM
#5
7 Posts: 1664
I dunno man. I would much rather see manpower invested into improving the veterancy system for infantry and vehicles but instead we will get an overhauled War SSpoils system which has no place in RTS IMO.
19 Mar 2015, 06:50 AM
#6
2 
Posts: 538
produce Goliaths at vet3!!
Greetings from Nürnberg - always happy to increase our local COH pool for local events - more glory: Rankade ladder
19 Mar 2015, 07:40 AM
#7
Posts: 17892 | Subs: 8
Really bad idea.
Reason?
Not everyone have them.
Armies who do already have advantage over armies who don't, why the gap should be widened?
Being able to build fortification is already advantage in itself.
Reason?
Not everyone have them.
Armies who do already have advantage over armies who don't, why the gap should be widened?
Being able to build fortification is already advantage in itself.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
19 Mar 2015, 07:56 AM
#8
Posts: 1605 | Subs: 1
Forgot to mention Incendiary rounds/survival smoke grenade or something of this nature to be included in this process.
Smoke for MG bunkers? Sure.
19 Mar 2015, 08:15 AM
#9
1 Posts: 169
Only if it applied to basic HMG nests that were available to all factions. If so then possible abilities could be AP ammunition, button vehicle, munitions or manpower-costing self repair (when out of combat), an activated faster burst that causes very high suppression but significantly less damage. I could probably think of more but it's too late for that right now.
Pudding.
19 Mar 2015, 08:35 AM
#10
1 
Posts: 764
produce Goliaths at vet3!!
Only reason why i would like this idea
19 Mar 2015, 08:38 AM
#11
Posts: 1355
Yeah, nice idea.
Vet1: Smoke
Vet2: Armour piercing rounds
Vet3: Blitzkrieg
Vet1: Smoke
Vet2: Armour piercing rounds
Vet3: Blitzkrieg
19 Mar 2015, 08:40 AM
#12
Posts: 2115 | Subs: 1
whats the point of it..
servant to the vet 5 königskübel
b4 and soviet FHQ enthusiast
fan of the illustrious black prince
b4 and soviet FHQ enthusiast
fan of the illustrious black prince
19 Mar 2015, 08:47 AM
#13
Posts: 17892 | Subs: 8
whats the point of it..
To provide a suitable dirt hole for ubermensh manning the gun.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
19 Mar 2015, 08:56 AM
#14
9 Posts: 1094 | Subs: 20
Yeah good idea, but OKW needs a vet 5 bunker.
19 Mar 2015, 09:06 AM
#15
Posts: 168
Yeah good idea, but OKW needs a vet 5 bunker.
Currently a lot of OKW vet options are underwhelming and not in line with the rest of the faction design, such as recrewed weapons and tanks only vetting up to 3 stars instead of their signature 5.
19 Mar 2015, 09:07 AM
#16
Posts: 380
Five stars for flak hq, oh sheeeeeeeeet
19 Mar 2015, 09:16 AM
#17
Posts: 17892 | Subs: 8
Currently a lot of OKW vet options are underwhelming and not in line with the rest of the faction design, such as recrewed weapons and tanks only vetting up to 3 stars instead of their signature 5.
Maybe because they had better training on panther and raketenwerfer then on sherman and maxim HERPDERP.
They don't have vet5 on allied equipment, because it makes no sense.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
19 Mar 2015, 09:23 AM
#18
Posts: 1605 | Subs: 1
Five stars for flak hq, oh sheeeeeeeeet
Vet 5: upgrade caliber to 8,8 (keeping rate of fire the same ofc)
19 Mar 2015, 09:26 AM
#19
Posts: 1963 | Subs: 1
Wrong.
Maybe because they had better training on panther and raketenwerfer then on sherman and maxim HERPDERP.
They don't have vet5 on allied equipment, because it makes no sense.
They had better training on Allied equipments actually. Think about why they can learn so much more using their own equipments but only a few with Allied equipments?
_____________________________________________________________________________
19 Mar 2015, 09:47 AM
#20
Posts: 17892 | Subs: 8
Sooo, any photoshop/paint master want to make Königsbunker or Bunker Ace picture?
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
9 | ||
 |
|
|
821 | ||
 |
|
|
17 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.968562.633+23
- 2.555227.710+11
- 3.29446.865-1
- 4.276110.715+14
- 5.262143.647+6
- 6.250150.625+11
- 7.22491.711+11
- 8.250135.649+1
- 9.8119.810+1
- 10.13556.707+3
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
7
Download
759
Board Info
1 post in the last 24h
42 posts in the last week
127 posts in the last month
42 posts in the last week
127 posts in the last month
Registered members: 45107
Welcome our newest member, ashlyewatts
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, ashlyewatts
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM