I really have mixed feelings about the new approach to balance. While I definitely see the point in basically mirroring the stats on comparable vehicles on either side in achieving easy balance, I wonder where the specific feel of coh units will be.
IS-2 has basically the same values as the tiger now, su-85 is a stug, but with slightly slower fire rate and so forth.
Feel free to correct me if im wrong on the values.
Has anyone else felt the same about that kind of balance approach? How is it dealt with in other rts?
New balance changes
- This thread is locked
18 Apr 2013, 11:03 AM
#1
Posts: 6
18 Apr 2013, 11:18 AM
#2
Posts: 42
If you put in mirror matches it's bye bye to the assimetrical balance. Which imho is awfull. One of the major reasons I fell in love is because of the assimetrical balance, wehr vs ami, that's just epic. Not only do they have different skins, skills, but they play a lot differently too.
In short, I'm not too thrilled about this new aproach.
In short, I'm not too thrilled about this new aproach.
18 Apr 2013, 15:26 PM
#3
Posts: 1620 | Subs: 2
The game already has a bit of a homogeneous feel because you can't alter your teching path very much and the choice of commander doesn't make as big of a difference as the choice of one side or another of a doctrine, so it's strange to see them go even further in this direction.
Signature by Ginnungagap
18 Apr 2013, 15:50 PM
#4
Posts: 308 | Subs: 1
I would be ok with creating simple "tiers" for vehicles, although that's already pretty lazy.
But mirroring those tiers across factions, when you only have TWO factions?!
People were complaining about only having US vs WM all those years and those factions were actually unique.
But mirroring those tiers across factions, when you only have TWO factions?!
People were complaining about only having US vs WM all those years and those factions were actually unique.
18 Apr 2013, 16:27 PM
#5
Posts: 182
I presume Relic is trying to homogenize vehicles/tanks so that they can collect comparative data on each match-up. It allows them to analyze more clearly what each faction is lacking- and abundant in, which will, in turn, facilitate more systematic and precise balance adjustments.
I'm pretty sure that this approach to balance is only preliminary, as it would rob the game of most of its flavor. Having the following just wouldn't be fun: Elephant=ISU152, Tiger=IS2, StugIII=SU85, PIV=T34, and etc.
I'm pretty sure that this approach to balance is only preliminary, as it would rob the game of most of its flavor. Having the following just wouldn't be fun: Elephant=ISU152, Tiger=IS2, StugIII=SU85, PIV=T34, and etc.
20 Apr 2013, 22:48 PM
#6
Posts: 180
I'm wondering if the Russians are going to get some decent AT-guns...
20 Feb 2019, 19:54 PM
#7
Posts: 2260 | Subs: 1
I think the new balance changes are very good
20 Feb 2019, 20:45 PM
#8
1 
Posts: 2885
I think the new balance changes are very good
1/10, too easy to realise it's a troll necro
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
116 | ||
 |
|
|
14 | ||
 |
|
|
2 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.968562.633+23
- 2.555227.710+11
- 3.29446.865-1
- 4.276110.715+14
- 5.259143.644+3
- 6.250150.625+11
- 7.7314.839+2
- 8.22491.711+11
- 9.250135.649+1
- 10.19265.747+5
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
7
Download
756
Board Info
693 users are online:
693 guests
5 posts in the last 24h
39 posts in the last week
136 posts in the last month
39 posts in the last week
136 posts in the last month
Registered members: 45077
Welcome our newest member, Hoofar01
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, Hoofar01
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM