What do you think?
I'd like it to have faster speed, a HP upgrade and/or a range upgrade..at least.
The Bulldozer sherman is also lackluster due to the regular Sherman being overall better.
M10: Does it need buffs?
3 Jul 2014, 15:52 PM
#1
Posts: 1571
3 Jul 2014, 15:55 PM
#2
Posts: 17895 | Subs: 8
Acceleration, badly.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
3 Jul 2014, 16:22 PM
#3
Posts: 157
YES,
acceleration is definitely;
Either range increased to 55 OR make it like stugIII good at both AI and AT.
acceleration is definitely;
Either range increased to 55 OR make it like stugIII good at both AI and AT.
3 Jul 2014, 16:32 PM
#4
Posts: 449
OR make it like stugIII good at both AI and AT.
NEVER.
It's a "tank destroyer".
If anything it should be better at penetrating armor. Currently it's only good vs light armor which is a little odd.
3 Jul 2014, 16:34 PM
#5
Posts: 410
I personally like this tank, you can skip captain (90 fuel) and Jackson (125 fuel) = 215 fuel and you can get 3 M10 for 240 fuel.
They are bad for attacking but if you use it defensively with AT gun support, they can become a real thread for enemy armor. And with vet they have access to High penetration bullets.
IMO they should fix the pathing of that tank, it seems really poor.
They are bad for attacking but if you use it defensively with AT gun support, they can become a real thread for enemy armor. And with vet they have access to High penetration bullets.
IMO they should fix the pathing of that tank, it seems really poor.
3 Jul 2014, 16:39 PM
#6
Posts: 950 | Subs: 1
If anything it should be better at penetrating armor. Currently it's only good vs light armor which is a little odd.
it has only 20 less pen than the m36, but its 2/3 of the cost.
3 Jul 2014, 16:45 PM
#7
Posts: 2053
it has only 20 less pen than the m36, but its 2/3 of the cost.
Yup, its cheap and efficient. Its perfect as it is. One destroyed my panther because RNG favored it and it penned all shots and RNG screwed me over and my panther shot the ground twice. I was playing OKW, so the exchange was maddening.
3 Jul 2014, 16:59 PM
#8
Posts: 97
they work real well when mixed in with shermans. both cover each other's weaknesses and contribute to a nice big armored blob.
3 Jul 2014, 17:01 PM
#9
Posts: 449
it has only 20 less pen than the m36, but its 2/3 of the cost.
Yeah, it does look good on paper. Maybe I just had a case of bad RNG when using it.
3 Jul 2014, 17:12 PM
#10
Posts: 3293
tbh i think they need a buff or a role change it doesn't feel all that useful.
Failure is always an option. 
It's a happy massacre?! (yes, yes it is!)
Caffeine illegal for WiFi's to ingest in 48 states, 2 colonies, and 1 providences. 
To make most awesome thing in universe combine Bears and Nicholas Cage! 
and remember kids, we didn't start the flame-war!
3 Jul 2014, 23:24 PM
#11
Posts: 1571
The Puma is much more effective than the M10 IMO.
4 Jul 2014, 01:56 AM
#12
Posts: 1026
Idk. My partner has started using them in our team games. They do ok sometimes. Not a major balance issue even if it might be able to use a small buff.
The Bulldozer Sherman is pretty hopeless though. Rarely gets good hits. Even regular sherman with HE and a turret gunner is feeling a little weak, maybe its because by the time I get them there's usually obers running around the field.
The Bulldozer Sherman is pretty hopeless though. Rarely gets good hits. Even regular sherman with HE and a turret gunner is feeling a little weak, maybe its because by the time I get them there's usually obers running around the field.
4 Jul 2014, 02:20 AM
#13
Posts: 1637
400 HP M10 and 480 M36. Both are too slow and inaccurate on the move to be flanking Tank Destoryers. I think they both need something.
The PTRS's are fine as they are. Whenever i'm up against Guard Infantry, I always have to be careful with my vehicles or the Guards will completely destroy them. Good range, good damage and fairly cheap; if anything, the PTRS should nerfed since it's ridiculously good for the price. Even in the hands of Conscripts, the PTRS's are extremely potent.
7 Jul 2014, 22:59 PM
#14
Posts: 210
I personally like this tank, you can skip captain (90 fuel) and Jackson (125 fuel) = 215 fuel and you can get 3 M10 for 240 fuel.
They are bad for attacking but if you use it defensively with AT gun support, they can become a real thread for enemy armor. And with vet they have access to High penetration bullets.
IMO they should fix the pathing of that tank, it seems really poor.
Skip Captain? By the time you can deploy a M10 tank destroyer, you could have already built a Jackson.
The tank comes out way too late for what it does. A lowered CP cost would be the best buff for the tank right now.
8 Jul 2014, 00:38 AM
#15
Posts: 28
If it had better acceleration and maneuverability, it would be fine because it could effectively kite or fire and displace. Can't do either properly with how lethargic is currently is.
Being the mitylite that I am, doing what a mitylite does.
8 Jul 2014, 00:53 AM
#16
Posts: 508
It'd go a long way if it just didn't auto target infantry.
8 Jul 2014, 03:23 AM
#17
Posts: 627
Turret Rotation, Acceleration, Hold Fire, and Target Priority. Its damage and durability are right where they should be. These all go for the M36 as well. With a Target Priority/Hold Fire fix, Turret Rotation buff might not be needed.
8 Jul 2014, 03:25 AM
#18
Posts: 1384
For the price, I think it's fine. It's a cheap tank destroyer.
The target priority should really be fixed though.
The target priority should really be fixed though.
8 Jul 2014, 06:52 AM
#19
Posts: 2487 | Subs: 21
-Target priority needs to be fixed.
-Increase acceleration maybe?
-Tiny armor buff so that it can compete with the Puma?
Other than this it is useful for emergency situations where you need armor quickly and cheaply. Saved my arse a couple times against high level players.
-Increase acceleration maybe?
-Tiny armor buff so that it can compete with the Puma?
Other than this it is useful for emergency situations where you need armor quickly and cheaply. Saved my arse a couple times against high level players.
8 Jul 2014, 07:03 AM
#20
Posts: 151
The Bulldozer sherman is also lackluster
I have no idea how you have been using this, but it is in no way shape or form "lackluster", this tank can wipe half squads of anything at any moment, ive had whole Volks sqauds nuked by this thing constantly.
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
47 | ||
 |
|
|
27 | ||
|
|
|
|
24 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
 |
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
53 | ||
|
|
|
|
26 | ||
|
|
|
|
23 | ||
|
|
|
|
8 | ||
|
|
|
|
6 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.278110.716+16
- 2.269144.651+1
- 3.29446.865-1
- 4.558230.708+2
- 5.968565.631-3
- 6.253150.628+14
- 7.22491.711+11
- 8.8120.802-1
- 9.19078.709+4
- 10.211115.647+16
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
7
Download
772
Board Info
531 users are online:
531 guests
12 posts in the last 24h
41 posts in the last week
152 posts in the last month
41 posts in the last week
152 posts in the last month
Registered members: 45263
Welcome our newest member, Amon
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, Amon
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM