Login

russian armor
COH2.ORG » Forums » Parlor Room » COH2 Central » COH2 Gameplay » what do you think of 2v2 at the moment?

what do you think of 2v2 at the moment?

PAGES (3)down
New topic New topic     Upload replay New Reply
mega
22 Mar 2016, 18:40 PM
#1
avatar of mega

Posts: 38

???
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Finndeed
22 Mar 2016, 18:41 PM
#2
avatar of Finndeed
Strategist Badge

Posts: 612 | Subs: 1

I think its full of blobers
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
SkysTheLimit
22 Mar 2016, 18:41 PM
#3
avatar of SkysTheLimit

Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1

It's horribly imbalanced. Winning is all about who can spam better.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
mega
22 Mar 2016, 18:42 PM
#4
avatar of mega

Posts: 38

i think fi brits would not be there it would be very balanced or at least fun
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Waegukin
22 Mar 2016, 18:43 PM
#5
avatar of Waegukin

Posts: 609

MG walls, Sim cities and blobs everywhere. There's a few maps like Vaux where you can flank, but then there's the cancer of Trois Point or double Wehr on Ettelbruck
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
mega
22 Mar 2016, 18:44 PM
#6
avatar of mega

Posts: 38

soviets seem very weak in early game if they are not maxim spaming
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Australian Magic
22 Mar 2016, 18:53 PM
#7
avatar of Australian Magic

Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2

It's about who can cheese better.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
SkysTheLimit
22 Mar 2016, 18:59 PM
#8
avatar of SkysTheLimit

Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1

It's more stressful than fun, honestly. You get walked over by blobbing jackasses and then they tell you to l2p. Very few games frustrate me as much as 2v2s in Coh2, and I bought the game back at launch specifically to play with my friend. So I find it pretty unfortunate that 1v1 is all Relic cares about, and when you come here to talk about 2v2 half the community tells you to kindly eff off since "1v1 is all that matters", as if the people who want to play competitively somehow spent more on the game than I did.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Stafkeh
22 Mar 2016, 19:17 PM
#9
avatar of Stafkeh
Patrion 14

Posts: 1006

Blob and cheese. Not real fun to play at the moment.
\:snfQuinn:/ \:brad:/
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
ClassyDavid
22 Mar 2016, 20:32 PM
#10
avatar of ClassyDavid

Posts: 424 | Subs: 2

I've always enjoyed 2s more than any other game mode due to the increased amount of builds one can do thanks to a teammate and the less amount of stress from 1s. Any higher is a mess to myself but 2s hit a sweet spot for me. While balance is still a issue I have fun. Don't know this talk of blobbing as I find them a non issue and cheese is still counterable with skill.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
|GB| The Hooligan486
22 Mar 2016, 20:36 PM
#11
avatar of |GB| The Hooligan486
Senior Referee Badge

Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1

I think there are 2 many blobbers in 2v2 right now and not enough maps were you can flank decently. For example Minsk Pocket. If you lay down some bunkers as axis and make a big blob = you win. It's pretty hard for allies to win in 2v2. Except if you go brits and lay down 3 mortar pits.... I gues you can't balance 1v1 and 2v2 at the same moment :(
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
ZombiFrancis
22 Mar 2016, 20:52 PM
#12
avatar of ZombiFrancis

Posts: 2742

Mixed factions are rather imbalanced.

The best matchups for 2v2s are double Soviet v double Ostheer, or double USF v double OKW.

Double Brits is usually just asking for emplacements, so typically team games with Brits are going to be tedious. Plus there's no equivalently designed faction to match up the Brits, although they are probably the only faction that has the tools for mixed Axis teams.

Just like Opposing Fronts before, USF and OKW were only designed with each other in mind, not the original factions. Ostheer v USF and OKW v Soviets have been problematic since WFA's release in every size of matchup. The way the factions synergize in mixed teams isn't that balanced, so 2v2s (and to a lesser extent 3v3s and 4v4s) are best played with ONLY vanilla factions or ONLY WFA factions.
Strategic Territory Points Mod:
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=604491510
Classic resource points!
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Plaguer
22 Mar 2016, 20:57 PM
#13
avatar of Plaguer

Posts: 498

2v2 is just extremely annoying to play currently, full of blobs and cheese but balance wise etc it's not that unbearable
www.twitch.tv/rawv1 usfusf okwokw sovietssoviets ostheerostheer
"Lefh is love, Lefh is life" Festung Support for the win FIFI
In game know as Törttö ᶠᶸᶜᵏᵧₒᵤ
Best rank 1v1 - 33 Soviets, 2v2 - 1 Ostheer RT :guyokay:
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
mega
22 Mar 2016, 21:05 PM
#14
avatar of mega

Posts: 38

cheese and blobbs are a thing in 2v2 but with more skill you are fine most of the time
But there are some things that just suck:

+ Brit op commanders (!!counter battery-aka skillkills!!+ emplacemants) (5cp land matress)
+ soviets forced into maxims because of no real alternative
+ double lmg squads
+ maybe okw a-move army because of all units in rooster are long range

Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Phy
22 Mar 2016, 21:08 PM
#15
avatar of Phy

Posts: 509 | Subs: 1

It would be pretty fun without brits. Cancer emplacement just makes games so boring. But gotta agree there's also a lot of spam/blobs which is kinda boring too.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
mega
22 Mar 2016, 21:11 PM
#16
avatar of mega

Posts: 38

empacements on its one are not much of a problem some mortars or isgs + flamenades or schrecks do the job
but if youre not allowed to have arty it starts beeing a problem
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Thunderhun
22 Mar 2016, 21:13 PM
#17
avatar of Thunderhun

Posts: 1617

jump backJump back to quoted post22 Mar 2016, 21:11 PMmega
empacements on its one are not much of a problem some mortars or isgs + flamenades or schrecks do the job
but if youre not allowed to have arty it starts beeing a problem


Cancer Regiment on Rzhev Winter or on Crossing :foreveralone:
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
LemonJuice
22 Mar 2016, 21:33 PM
#18
avatar of LemonJuice

Posts: 1144 | Subs: 7

its fun, i enjoy it.
http://l3monjuic3.deviantart.com

https://www.instagram.com/shkimart/
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
siuking666
22 Mar 2016, 21:35 PM
#19
avatar of siuking666

Posts: 707

It's fighting volks blob as Allies or fighting mortar emplacements as axis.

Relic's fucking P2W camp commanders.
Playercard: http://www.coh2.org/ladders/playercard/steamid/76561198005198550
My Theater of War Guide, Every missions on General/achievements/Grand Strategy:
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=309197460
My Guide of Using German Voices with English Text Tweak:
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=492709499
CoH2 Epic Moments Index:
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=573921959
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Grumpy
23 Mar 2016, 04:51 AM
#20
avatar of Grumpy

Posts: 1954

I used to play mostly 4v4's. Now, 2v2's are a lot more fun as either Axis or Allies. Balance seems mostly okay.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
PAGES (3)down
New topic New topic     Upload replay New Reply
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest
COH2.ORG » Forums » Parlor Room » COH2 Central » COH2 Gameplay » what do you think of 2v2 at the moment?

Ladders Top 10

UKF
USF
OKW
SOV
OST
1v1
2v2
3v3
4v4
  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

Top Tier Teams
VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Einhoven Country Honor
Honor it
7
 Download
Download
754
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

599 users are online: 1 member and 598 guests
edmond2003s
2 posts in the last 24h
36 posts in the last week
136 posts in the last month
Registered members: 45066
Welcome our newest member, Fid McSauce
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM