Pls remove/change 3v3 hybrid maps

New topic

New Reply

Posts: 1276

4v4/3v3 hybrid maps need to go, these maps are simply to large for such a lower player count and make these maps hard to manage. Forward retreat points on these maps break gameplay and units such as the kubal allows teams to cap territory at an abnormal or unfair rate and that shouldn't be the case. While 3v3 is one of the least played modes its still worth going through these maps and adjusting them.

Maps that should be removed from 3v3 automatch pool

City 17
Hill 331
Lanz Ambush
Possibly La gleize
Possibly Leinne Forest

These maps either need to be scaled down with less points or change to accommodate the smaller game mode.

If changing these maps isnt worth the time, there are plenty of dedicated 3v3 maps in the workshop that with testing could be added to fill the void in the pool.

Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

Start with removing ALL maps which spawn your team spread out. 1 on one side and 2 on the other.

Hill 331 is excessively big. I don't think Steppes is that big.

My controls weren't working
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.

Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.

Multi Quote

Posts: 875 | Subs: 6

Steppes is a great 3v3 map though. It's nice and open but not too big.

Posts: 1276

6 Jan 2016, 18:20 PMTheMachine

Steppes is a great 3v3 map though. It's nice and open but not too big.

Revising to remove stepps. Maybe normalize the spawn system

Posts: 1664

I think Lienne is fine in 3v3 but why can't more maps scale based on player count?

Posts: 4301 | Subs: 2

la gleize and lienne forest is more of 3v3 maps.

hill331 is just f-ed up no matter what.

city 17 and ambush have balance issues which affect both 3v3 and 4v4. they are worse 3v3 maps because of split bases.