Login

russian armor

I'm surprised they didn't buff trash Sexton.

Sexton doesn't need change.
Option Distribution Votes
69%
24%
7%
Total votes: 129
Vote VOTE! Vote ABSTAIN
19 Nov 2015, 09:10 AM
#1
19 Nov 2015, 09:13 AM
#2
avatar of bingo12345

Posts: 304

I made a mistake i didn't make "Sexton is okay" poll.
admin can you make "Sexton is okay" poll"?
19 Nov 2015, 11:27 AM
#3
avatar of atouba

Posts: 482

They will lose their jobs if they fix everything in one patch. Remember they said they have a 5 year plan? lol...
19 Nov 2015, 11:34 AM
#4
avatar of bingo12345

Posts: 304

jump backJump back to quoted post19 Nov 2015, 11:27 AMatouba
They will lose their jobs if they fix everything in one patch. Remember they said they have a 5 year plan? lol...


my god... capitalism broken! need fix.
19 Nov 2015, 11:46 AM
#5
avatar of SpaceHamster
Patrion 14

Posts: 474

I actually made a post where I pointed out the buffs sexton needs but that disappeared into the abyss for some reason.

I can only say to that:

19 Nov 2015, 13:17 PM
#6
avatar of CombatWombat

Posts: 98

The Sexton in its current state is a unit that is so bad that calling it in actually puts you at a disadvantage from the wasted resources, population and upkeep.

You woulnd't even get this unit if you were vastly ahead of your opponent and just wanted to troll them.
19 Nov 2015, 13:35 PM
#7
avatar of Swift

Posts: 2723 | Subs: 1

@OP added "Sexton is currently fine" per your request.
19 Nov 2015, 14:24 PM
#8
avatar of __deleted__

Posts: 830

Please no more major buffs for anything :foreveralone:
19 Nov 2015, 19:17 PM
#9
avatar of bingo12345

Posts: 304

jump backJump back to quoted post19 Nov 2015, 13:35 PMSwift
@OP added "Sexton is currently fine" per your request.


Thanks for adding okay poll. admin.
19 Nov 2015, 19:42 PM
#10
avatar of Bananenheld

Posts: 1593 | Subs: 1

voted for buff, but carefully..having a good non doc base howitzer can be abusive as fuck
19 Nov 2015, 20:14 PM
#11
avatar of drChengele
Patrion 14

Posts: 640 | Subs: 1

I once played a 1v1 against a guy who went arty commander. He starts shelling a position with a Sexton, and instead of moving around, I just knowingly moved my infantry blob through there. I remember raising an eyebrow at a lucky shell killing a Volkssquad.

I mean, I suppose it's not UTTER garbage, since there we have the proof it wiped at least one squad in the history of competitive 1v1s due to my stupidity. :foreveralone:
19 Nov 2015, 20:39 PM
#12
avatar of ferwiner
Donator 11

Posts: 2885

voted for buff, but carefully..having a good non doc base howitzer can be abusive as fuck


How is sexton a non-doc howie?
19 Nov 2015, 20:48 PM
#13
avatar of Bananenheld

Posts: 1593 | Subs: 1



How is sexton a non-doc howie?

omg never mind, ive thought about the base arty from brits, both are in need of a buff my misstake :(
19 Nov 2015, 20:50 PM
#14
avatar of RPhilMan1

Posts: 106

It needs a buff.

Go on, dare UKF players to choose Artillery Commander, especially in 1v1 and 2v2.

Hey, less Churchill call-ins. Win-win.
19 Nov 2015, 21:13 PM
#15
avatar of tenid

Posts: 232

What confuses me is that the whole doctrine is plainly bad, yet the only change it gets is to make the valentine a 6CP call in instead of 8CP. Even then I'm convinced it will be as pointless at 6CP as it is at 8.

There hasn't even been a comment on if the line of sight change in the last patch was intended or not.
19 Nov 2015, 21:55 PM
#16
avatar of dOPEnEWhAIRCUT

Posts: 239

I think the devs are hesitant to buff the Sexton at the moment due to the dominance of certain faction's indirect fire within the current meta. At the very least the Sexton can certainly do with an increase to range; it's very silly that it has to get so close to its target to let off a barrage unlike any other of its counterparts.
1 Dec 2015, 02:09 AM
#17
avatar of Flying Dustbin

Posts: 270 | Subs: 1

Artillery Regiment Valentine spam will become the new meta in the December patch :snfPeter:
1 Dec 2015, 02:42 AM
#18
avatar of ThoseDeafMutes

Posts: 1026

Sexton and base howis need a radius increase on their shells.

Sexton needs a range increase too.
1 Dec 2015, 03:04 AM
#19
avatar of Dullahan

Posts: 1384

I'd be happy if it had a bit shorter of a cooldown, but I dunno. When used with the valentine it can fire pretty frequently and it can dish out a ton of damage.


I'd love to use it more to really get a feel for it, but it's fucking impossible. By the time you can get 9 cp's and the resources to call out a valentine and a sexton, you're facing down medium tanks.

I'm not very quick to say things are unviable. I think it's a terrible word that people use to describe "hard to use", but jesus christ on a pickle I haven't been able to make royal artillery work at all in any semblance of a real game. I'm still trying to get it to click by focusing on playing a longer t2 and not even teching up to t3 but it's risky as hell to play Brits without proper armour. (It's possible, but I find it difficult)

Using the sexton on its own just seems like doing the doctrine wrong, it's meant to be used in synergy with the valentine. But getting both of them and then keeping the valentine alive to vet 1 is just UGHGHLA>kndcl.asnbf right now.
1 Dec 2015, 03:12 AM
#20
avatar of WhySooSerious

Posts: 1248

Brits dont need arty what kind of bs is that? :thumbsup::thumbsup:
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

558 users are online: 558 guests
9 posts in the last 24h
39 posts in the last week
152 posts in the last month
Registered members: 45059
Welcome our newest member, mickreyt42
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM