It is so intersting how the tables have turned. All these discussions are almost identical to those 2013-early 2014. Now CoH2 is regarded as the gold standard for coh games.
I don't think anyone here besides a few are adamant that CoH 3 can't be better with time. However, the fact that the previous entry released in a worse state than it was patched to after ten years has no influence on how I should be reviewing a game released today.
Plenty of people here (and people I've talked to) are of the opinion that CoH3 will eventually be good.
Does that mean that I should give the game a "recommend" review? Fuck no, the game is not in a state that warrants a recommend from me. If SEGA wanted better reviews on release, then tough shit, they should have waited to release it with more QC. I'm not SEGA's PR/ Advertising department. I play video games.
United States

