Profile of donofsandiego

Avatar Area

Offline United States
Posts: 1403

General Information
Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJT-oswDRyOrhrVghT-6ZRw
Steam: 76561198157193379
Nationality:

United States
Game Name: Snaek

Signature

"And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family?..The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and... the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If...if...We didn't love freedom enough...We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward.”

― Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn , The Gulag Archipelago 1918–1956

Show Latest Posts


Thread: Post Your CoH3 Replays Here 12 Sep 2023, 15:53 PM Vs. Randoms 4v4 -replay game_VS_elite_inf.rec A 4v4 game where I demonstrate the panzergren build with DAK. Pgren>250>Pgren>Pgren>Tech x 2(Varies from here)>254>Marder>Grenade From what I've heard, the build isn't very applicable to smaller gamemodes, so 1v1 and 2v2 players need not apply, but if you're playing DAK and you feel like you're getting stomped on, this build might be just the thing to make you feel worth a damn again. Basically, what ends up happening is that I lose a bunch of early game engagements because I'm not able to properly flank the Brit MG (user error ofc), and I end up losing the VP for maybe 4-5 minutes. It was such a rough engagement that they even attempt to cap the ammunition point by my HQ, they get so cocky. I regroup, however, and with the 8 Rad, I push back out and take my VP. I then got a Marder, and a 254 after. I'm successfully able to defend the VP against 2 ghurka squads, get multiple teamweapon steals, and I even force my opponent back to base. In addition, I'm able to defend the VP against two opponents attacking one after the other. Sadly my teammates were struggling pretty hard south of me, so we lost the game. I tried to flank down into middle a couple times, to varying effect. I know I'm not as high skill as some of y'all on here, but I feel like it would still be a fun watch. I'd be happy to hear what you have to say about it. P.S. - oh yeah, I didn't even select a battlegroup. I've been trying to get proficient at playing DAK with the base roster, so that's the reason for that. In: COH3 Central
Thread: Orders don't work.12 Sep 2023, 04:55 AM Jump back to quoted post9 Sep 2023, 17:51 PMEuan Huh. Well, thanks for that. I'm surprised because several people have said to me in game that they have the same problem, but maybe it's not as common as I thought. Still, I have the feeling that the netcode just doesn't do any double-checking at all, so just doesn't work on high-latency / lossy connections (insert TCP vs UDP meme.jpg) After having played a bit more, I can say that my units receive their move orders pretty consistently, but I find myself giving AT grenade orders multiple times, since units seem to just not receive them sometimes. In: COH3 Central
Thread: IA vs. AI, or "Why are Euros like this?"7 Sep 2023, 17:17 PM It's more than once that I've seen this on forums somewhere, but I cannot for the life of me understand why Europeans continue to call AI "IA". Why are Europeans like this? Why? I am an intelligent adversary, you are an intelligent adversary, a goddamn cat can be an intelligent adversary if you're playing with it with a string. It's a f!@#$ing Artificial Intelligence. A robot. Not real. Artificial. Maybe this made sense back when brits invented automated tiddlywinks machines that they could play against or some shit, but once multiplayer games were invented, "IA" stopped making sense. I come across Intelligent Adversaries every 4v4 PvP game (some less than others). It's a terrible descriptor. Is this just the Europeans' version of the Imperial measurement system? How long until they realize "AI" (the metric system) is just better in every way? In: Scrap Yard
Thread: Why listening to the community isn't always good.7 Sep 2023, 16:58 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Sep 2023, 16:55 PMRosbone Relic could care less. That's true. I suppose that if they couldn't care less about deadlines, they wouldn't be updating the game at all now would they? In: COH3 Central
Thread: CoH3 mod - reBALANCE Tuning Pack7 Sep 2023, 01:01 AM I messaged 45 users in my friends list if they would be willing to give CoH 3 another shot with this tuning pack and maybe some custom maps. Every single one is not interested. That's the level of apathy this game has accumulated for itself. It honestly beggars belief In: COH3 Central
Thread: Orders don't work.6 Sep 2023, 18:39 PM Of all the things I could say about CoH 3, at the very least I could say it was usually pretty responsive outside of giving attack orders to casemates (though that's since been improved), so my final answer is latency. In: COH3 Central
Thread: Why listening to the community isn't always good.6 Sep 2023, 18:04 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Sep 2023, 17:12 PMDIRTY_FINISHER On top of people like AE being involved who is a glorified anchorman that couldnt win a game against someone who RE spams him in COH2 ( he lacks understanding of gameplay). To be completely fair to A_E, he is a popular content creator, so if nothing else he would be a good ask on what a lot of people like to see most in a game/what brings in the most attention. I would imagine that they were asking him about what players liked watching the most about previous games. Or maybe how he would improve the replay/caster system. In: COH3 Central
Thread: Why listening to the community isn't always good.4 Sep 2023, 16:32 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Sep 2023, 11:45 AMHannibal Quality post right there. Same to you! Divided on the topic though. I think having 4 factions currently keeps the game alive, because even with only 2-3 maps, you can have at least some variety in gameplay....the balancing isn't an awful lot off..."overfitting"..CoH3 balances each faction against two others from the start... All very good points This surely came at the cost of other parts not being finished. I don't think that CoH3 would have been a solid game if it released with two factions and shifted resources elsewhere. There was too much wrong with the game at release, having four factions can't be the cause of these issues. The post-release drought is a symptom of incompetent Relic leadership... +1 I think the situation overall has improved. Certainly, a lot of stuff sucking the fun out of the game in 4v4 got patched early on, like OST emplacement spam and brit boys rifle deathballs. ...Relic bit off more than they could chew, at least with poor leadership and planning. Four factions at release is part of that, but not the main reason why the launch failed so horribly and why the post-launch phase was very underwhelming. Thank you for the post. Good points all around. Maybe it was doomed from the start just from the Relic staff and leadership, maybe it was biting off more than they could chew, or maybe it was both ofc. Who knows. To be completely fair, it's probably not worth much to speculate about, seeing as there's nothing we can do to change the release (unless someone on here's invented a time machine I don't know about ), it was more of a hopeless rant on my part haha. In: COH3 Central
Thread: Why listening to the community isn't always good.3 Sep 2023, 21:31 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Sep 2023, 20:23 PMFantomasas Nah, don't twist this back on the community. Someone only read the title of the thread and then decided to comment In: COH3 Central
Thread: Why listening to the community isn't always good.1 Sep 2023, 16:32 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Sep 2023, 13:01 PMOrangePest I like having 4 factions, because dak is cool Yeah, here I was thinking that the plan was to release the game with the two new factions. Apparently it was US and Wehr, so maybe not as shrimple as I thought. In: COH3 Central