Women are always the victim, so if you're blaming a woman, that's victim blaming. Duh.
/j before someone has an aneurysm typing up a response to this |
And you consider that to be 'victim blaming'? Are you on glue?
Women are always the victim, so if you're blaming a woman, that's victim blaming. Duh. |
Look down on us, 4vs4 scrubs, all you want, but the game is fun, it has its unique rhythm, diverse amount of usable units/commands, and the balance was fine.
Some low-hanging garbage is there in 4vs4, but once you have the "counter long range arty" commanders in your pocket, it becomes a fun game where people bring out all the dumb shit that is either not viable in small modes, or simply takes far too long to get to the field.
All we wanted was some modernization, and the new-life in the form of live-service content delivery...
Mega +1 |
4vs4 and boring meta... I have a bad news for you
CoH 2 might have a "boring meta", but at least you have options within that meta. Like I don't always have to pick conscripts or penals in CoH 2, or I can get more MGs or whatever. Plus, there's map variety. There's only so fuckin long I can take bringing double MGs and mortars vs panzergren and jaeger blobs on the same.fuckin.map.over.and.over.and.over.again. |
I thought people dislike the game atm because of the lack of multiplayer content, not because the sound isn't as good as they expected it to be.
I honestly couldn't care less about the sound design. It sounds fine to me. The game just developed a boring meta quickly and there are only two 4v4 maps. That's the long and short of it for me. |
People are not annoyed there were women involved in the development of COH3.
People are annoyed because they think Relic hires not ONLY based on ability but also on "diversity". I don`t think this has anything to do with why COH3 is disappointing by the way. I do find it annoying that Relic has also jumped on the "woke" bandwagon though.
The very best people have to be hired to get the job done. No matter if they are male, female, transgender, two-spirit or whatever else.
+1 to all |
Coh3 is still a good game, i had good 2v2 still.
CoH 3 is not an unsalvagable game! It's fun, but bland. It needs more content and closer attention from the devs, but that's a tall order considering what we've seen so far.
I hope Relic hires good people...come back and save coh3!
Amen |
That is simply false. Companies make games and not a specific group of people.
That is completely arbitrary attempt to create a connection where there is little to non. It like claiming "Canadian people made COH3, whether that's bad or not is a decision the player makes".
I was speaking generally, not about CoH 3. If I was talking about CoH , I would have said CoH 3. It would be nore accurate to say "canadians are making our games. whether that's bad or not is up to the player." Which is a completely accurate statement.
Anyways, I've already relented on this issue and admitted CoH 3's issues come more from corporate "sell first, develop later" MTX-heavy bullshit, but there is clear proof that Relic is posting about SJW talking points. White men can be SJWs too, if you weren't aware (that whole reddit thread I quoted was from one), they just hate living in their own skin. |
It is both and many other inefficiencies.
We have seen crazy SJW now wasting dev time with their hissy drama about no boobs on female characters!
Yeah, the story is basically about two groups of SJWs arguing over which portrayal of Rivet would be the most "female empowering".
From the Reddit post:
The lead writer was a woman. The lead character TD was a trans person who, at the time, had not transitioned.
Everyone else in the discussion was a white cis male.
At the time the argument occurred, there were two women and one female-presenting trans person on the team. That trans person had lived their life up to that point as a woman, and had the lived experience thereof.
Everyone else on the 20+ person team was a man.
More from the author:
...Fellow men, we're all part of the problem. As a white man in the game industry, I enjoy a ton of privilege, and that also makes me part of the system that causes the issues we see at places like Blizzard.
We all share responsibility.
But just because we're part of the problem doesn't mean we can't take action to remedy it. A systemic problem can be changed by people in the system changing how they behave.
We can help fix the system by making changes in how we behave.
You're in the system. You're part of it whether or not you want to be.
Change how you act, react, and how you move forward.
That's how you help. Change yourself to help fix the problem.
Call out bad behavior. Give people room. Listen.
Also, for the love of god, don't brand yourself as "one of the good ones."
You're not. I'm not...
The "SJWs are making our games bad" is some of the most severe case of brain worms I've seen in this scene lol.
SJWs are making our games. Whether that's bad or not is a decision the player makes. |
I've been gaming since Pong and don't think I've ever seen a company abandon their latest release and go back to an earlier one. I doubt the franchise would survive that.
Running With Scissors
Long story short, Postal 3 (what's the deal with threes in gaming?) was such a massive flop they ended up releasing DLC for Postal 2 implying that all of Postal 3 was a hallucination from a comatose M.C.
They're now in the process of developing Postal 4.
EDIT: It probably helped that they released a no-nonsense PR statement, about how they genuinely fucked up, and encouraged players not to buy Postal 3 because it was so bad. (There was some kind of issue where they had another studio develop the game, but they didn't want to update it and RWS wasn't able to or something. Can't remember correctly.) |