Profile of Vipper

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: The Cancer That Is Soviet Field HQ12 Jan 2020, 15:21 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Jan 2020, 14:49 PMthedarkarmadillo Put them both at 80 range and the 82mm will deal more damage because it hits more accurately and more often. The reason the 120 is better more often is the range more than anything. You can test both mortar firing at 80 range into the FOW in cheat MOD and let come back with results. And "hits accurately" does not mean much if does less per hit. Jump back to quoted post12 Jan 2020, 14:49 PMthedarkarmadillo No one is saying the 120mm is bad. But in the ranges it can be used the higher dps of the Lil guy is simply better. I guess it comes down to preference. Now, if you will, this is extremely off topic and has gone on long enough. Yes it has for far to long because certain people are obsessed with trying to correct me... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The Cancer That Is Soviet Field HQ12 Jan 2020, 15:16 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Jan 2020, 14:47 PMKatitof Except.. you know... THE FUCKING STATS. The stats say that HM-38 has better AOE/Scatter ratio and thus is more damage. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The Cancer That Is Soviet Field HQ12 Jan 2020, 14:34 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Jan 2020, 10:39 AMKatitof That means its easier to hit infantry with 120mm then 81mm... Target as big as a truck, its irrelevant, because you're going to land most of your shots and weapon that shoots same damage, but does it more accurately and more often should perform better. Another nice theory but nothing to support it. (Once more using the term "accurately" does not mean much when it comes to explosive weapons since once a weapon misses it deliver different damage) My free advice to you: 1) install the game 2) download cheat MOD 3) Enable health monitor 4) place a truck into the FOW into range 50-60 5) Barrage with PM-41 6) Count how many round actually do full 80 damage 7) Come back with the results 8) Stop wasting everyone's time in you little crusade "I will prove Vipper wrong" and invest your time in improving your own post so that people might start taking you seriously. By the way did you just claim that PM-41 is better than HM-38 vs OKW trucks although according to you "Actually, not a single person said its better,..." In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The Cancer That Is Soviet Field HQ12 Jan 2020, 10:15 AM Jump back to quoted post12 Jan 2020, 09:24 AMKatitof I'm not proving you wrong, you do the job just fine all by yourself. You were simply asked to explain how unit with much lower accuracy and much lower DPS is better at hitting large, static target as you seem to be the only one with access to that diving knowledge against all common sense and math. OK you started your BS so allow me explain some basic things to you: Explosive weapons do not use accuracy Explosive weapons do not use the DPS formula and the HM-38 has a better AOE/Scatter ratio... You attempt to correct it me constantly (and fail miserably) even did so in post 71. I suggest that if want to correct someone you should start by correcting yourself: your claim "Actually, not a single person said its better,..." is wrong as I have already demonstrated to you. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The Cancer That Is Soviet Field HQ12 Jan 2020, 09:18 AM Jump back to quoted post12 Jan 2020, 09:10 AMKatitof Actually, not a single person said its better, only 1 asked you why you think 120mm is better despite 81mm having much better stats for the job, but you just dodged the question. Learn to read: Jump back to quoted post11 Jan 2020, 14:15 PMthedarkarmadillo But it's impossible. Same damage per shot shooting less. Unless there is a bug it shouldn't be dealing more damage. thedarkarmadilo clearly claimed that the PM-41 is better vs trucks. And I did not dodged anything I have explain what stats make the HM-38 better vs OKW trucks I simply avoided engaging in pointless argument with you who simply like to troll. Now PLS stop your silly quest of proving me wrong, I ma pretty sure that people of this forum are not really interested. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: High moving accuracy on Panzerfusilier G4312 Jan 2020, 09:13 AM Jump back to quoted post12 Jan 2020, 07:53 AMSander93 There's not a single other weapon that even comes close to the percentages of moving DPS that the G43s have. Penal SVTs only have 50-60% moving DPS. Only the Guards Mosin comes close, but an upgraded squad only gets two of them so the weapon is mostly irrelevant. The G43s are quite unique with their excellent moving DPS, and that's fine. The weapon might be better but it not available at all squad member so the moving DPS of squad can be comparable even if the G43 is superior. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: State of the Sturmtiger12 Jan 2020, 09:09 AM Jump back to quoted post12 Jan 2020, 02:43 AMzerocoh Dude I play elite armored 90% of the time after the last patch and ST is doing great. At current price and CP you can't really buff it, the unit has too much HP and armor. ST does not really have too much HP and armor it has less HP and less armor than Churchill. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The Cancer That Is Soviet Field HQ12 Jan 2020, 09:05 AM Jump back to quoted post12 Jan 2020, 05:59 AMSkysTheLimit No one said it wasn't, I just prefer the stock mortar in general. No vet 1 for flare, cheaper, stock, and shoots more often 120 has its strengths too, I just prefer the strengths of the stock mortar Read previous posts, it has been argued that the PM-41 is better at taking out OKW truck than the HM-38 something I doubt is true in a realistic in game scenario. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The Cancer That Is Soviet Field HQ11 Jan 2020, 23:25 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Jan 2020, 22:44 PMSerrith I think I can accept from a practical standpoint that the 120mm is better at taking out trucks since you can engage them a lot easier even when they are in safe positions, and at max range the superior AOE will compensate somewhat for scatter misses. But the stats don't support it doing higher theoretical DPS. If both are plopped at range 50 to diminish scatter issues, the PM41 is simply going to have a shorter TTK then the HM38. That might be true, but not realistic in in game scenario where in most cases one is firing into FOW and at ranges close to max where scatter is substantial not all shots land on top of the target. I have used the 120mm to take out truck many time (and pack howitzers) but I can not remember a single time where I managed to take out a truck with a single 81mm mortar. Again feel free to test it in game or in cheat MOD. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The Cancer That Is Soviet Field HQ11 Jan 2020, 21:49 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Jan 2020, 21:12 PMthedarkarmadillo Nobody is saying it's ineffective. We're saying the little mortar is more effective. Yes the AoE of the 120mm is wider but the increased ROF and accuracy of the little lad is simply superior for chopping dowm buildings. Shooting more often and dealing full damage more often > shooting less, hitting less but dealing more damage when it misses. Again from my experience the 120mm is better at taking out OKW trucks or other structures. If any one has a different experience or made a test in cheat MOD would be more than happy to watch a replay. In: COH2 Balance