Profile of SkysTheLimit

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 2817 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: [Winter Balance Update] OST FeedbackToday, 02:40 AM IMO sturms should be cheaper, but they also shouldn't be the starting unit. Making volks the starting unit is probably too radical a change at this point, but I feel like it would allow more flexibility for sturm changes In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] OKW FeedbackYesterday, 21:08 PM Jump back to quoted postYesterday, 21:03 PMLady Xenarra Ah right, thanks. Yeah, very often there's a model or two just to the side of the path and thus the squad survives. I can see a bit of scatter in the right direction being a killer Support weapons have always been good targets for arty (except maybe insta unpack stuff), I'd say working as intended. Yeah I think the balance of the stuka is actually perfect. IMO complaints about it stopped being legit once they made it die in 1 shot In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] OKW FeedbackYesterday, 21:00 PM Jump back to quoted postYesterday, 14:19 PMLady Xenarra Any specifics? If it's the laser guided munitions, they tried scatter in the past and somehow made it even more OP. (I have no idea how ) It probably made it too good against normal infantry (like non-support weapons i mean) The stuka isn't bad against infantry now but scatter can actually help with groups of infantry since they aren't uniform shape and can retreat instantly The "laser guided" part makes it easier to dodge stuka rockets for squads but really difficult to avoid with support weapons that have to pack up In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Improved postmatch statsYesterday, 20:53 PM Jump back to quoted postYesterday, 20:28 PMelchino7 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r-WTpw4CtrY&ab_channel=tightropegaming Yeah I've seen that vid before. Useful info to have but it doesn't really have anything to do with what I was talking about in OP I guess I can accept that it's too late to fix, but it's been this way since launch. Is there another reason it was never addressed? I'm specifically referring to how the "damage done" isn't the actual damage. It's the XP value of that damage i think In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Improved postmatch statsYesterday, 20:07 PM I'm sure this has been talked about before, but is it possible for us to get accurate damage numbers after the match? Right now I assume it's the XP value of the damage done. It would be much better if it were the actual damage On a side note it would be nice if "wipes" were also reported in the postmatch. Like how many squads lost, how many tanks lost, etc. Rather then lumping individual models and tanks together as "units lost" In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Soviet tech change suggestion13 Jan 2021, 20:50 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Jan 2021, 20:35 PMPip Personally I still think a guards variant (With button and PTRS) would be preferable to Penals with PTRS and Satchels... Which it probably should be anyway, so I think that's okay. Guards are more expensive, arrive a little later, etc. But elchinos ptrs penals and guards are also different enough that there's not too much overlap. Guards are more versatile. Their AT is less potent on its own, but button+ something else is great. Especially button + AT satchel (very satisfying) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Soviet tech change suggestion13 Jan 2021, 20:11 PM For the 4 ptrs penals. If it's too oppressive against light vehicles, make the 4th one (or even 3rd and 4th) be locked behind t4? Upgrade price around 80 muni Or maybe split the upgrade, 60mu for 2 ptrs and AT satchel, 20-40 for two more, after t4 built In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] General Discussion13 Jan 2021, 15:47 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Jan 2021, 15:09 PMKatitof I am very sorry for overestimating your ability to divide 1 by a half or multiply 1 by one and a half. I'm not talking about finding their new target size/incoming damage values you clown. I'm talking about supporting your claim that vet 3 7 man cons have less survivability then that suggestion That requires a lot more than multiplying or dividing 1 number by another. You also need to clarify against which weapons you're talking about... Which we both know you didn't do Jump back to quoted post13 Jan 2021, 15:09 PMKatitof Now you went completely off the rails and are arguing for the sake of arguing. So you won't answer the question. Got it And you accusing anyone of "arguing for the sake of arguing" is hilarious In: COH2 Balance
Thread: End Game report13 Jan 2021, 14:40 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Jan 2021, 14:14 PMVipper Damage is not very accurate but it helpful. I would like to see this fixed although it might be intentional. The actual damage numbers are preferable. I would think it's especially better for newer players I remember being very confused when I first started caring about unit stats In: Lobby
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] General Discussion13 Jan 2021, 14:14 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Jan 2021, 08:05 AMKatitof I did. But it was so simple I didn't felt the need to share. LOL sure dude Even if I believed you that just makes you a massive hypocrite. You regularly demand that people show their numbers... Jump back to quoted post13 Jan 2021, 08:05 AMKatitof so I have no idea what you're trying to do here at this point. Really? Cause I made it pretty simple for you: Why do you think the idea is silly? It's been done before Grens lost their RA bonus in exchange for damage resistance. This is an RA penalty in exchange for damage resistance. Aside from the numbers, tell us why you think that concept is silly. Not sure what you don't understand here, just explain your opinion better... In: COH2 Balance