Would be really nice. I think the main reason USF mortar was put in, was cause they had no other smoke than LT, CPT, RE, Major smoke when nades are teched.
Actually no, at the time mortar was introduced riflemen got the smoke grenade and not other units. |
Thread: (H)MG34 Yesterday, 21:05 PM
When one follows history of the changes in the case HMG-34 one has to keep in mind that before December patch HMG-34 had a superior crew and lots of DPS come from the crew. This is change is listed as "bug" change but it effected the balance of the unit:
"Fixed an issue where OKW starting weapon crew stats were superior to other faction weapon crews, and on-par with mainline infantry" |
Then why can soviets field a KV1 and SU85 for so much cheaper?
Because both KV-1 and SU-85 have less pop than they should do and it should be increased. |
Vickers is good at vet 3 and can suppress
Issue is MG crew often die or need rebuilding, then once your vickers is back to vet0 falls and vet 2 obers can quite literally walk up and laser bream it dead frontally. Maybe give it good suppression stock and only DPS buffs to its previous level through vet. Simple swap
Churchill issues are linked with greater Brit popcap issue late game, expensive IS pop when five man and already inflated Churchill and firefly pop on top makes their army size smaller than soviets or USF.
Look at the bang soviets get for their popcap with three penals, shocktroop, KV1 and SU85 compared to the mediocre line up of four IS, FF and Churchill. This could be fixed by reworking bolster and IS, putting them inline with rifleman pop. Or dropping FF church combo by a couple pop.
Neither Churchill nor FF has an inflated POP. |
Why do people only discuss troll posts
When I make a non-troll post nobody replies or discusses but I make a troll post and 3 people reply
Because if you do not respond to false claims, they get repeated again and again until they become a myth.
Like the one claiming that Sherman had a disadvantage because it had HE rounds... |
In typical Vipper style he doesn't mention all the details; he's implying not all squad members of Pfusi squads get the G43's which actually have close to 90% moving dps (looking at Cruzz his graphs).
Now compare them with paratroopers that do get 6 m1a1.
(at 0/10/20/35)
0.58/0.67/0.78/0.83
|
Play the game. They lose next to no DPS on the move.
I play the game.
Seems that DPS calculations are oftentimes wonky too, but I don't really understand them to be fair. In any event, they're far better on the move than almost any other unit.
Calculation are correct.
|
Now imagine this shit but they have like 90% moving DPS and 6 men for some reason, flares to spot your MGs, and you have no rocket arty. Welcome to playing against pfusies.
That is simply incorrect PF do not have 90% DPS when moving. They have (0/10/20/35):
0.77/0.78/0.75/0.74
|
A list of units this change affects:
-P4 at range above 30.
Try to get your stat right.
PzIV penetration is
Penetration near 125
Penetration mid 115
Penetration far 110
It affect PzIv at all ranges, it all affect other vehicles like Ostwind... |
Now we're waiting for you to acknowledge that nothing will be done about it, because its intended because of poor alternatives.
So that means that have you acknowledge at I have been right for 4 years now saying that they are OP and you have been wrong for t4 years now. Glad that you have finally accepted it. |
Relic Entertainment
T.R. TheSeekingGuy 
VonAsten 
