Profile of Vipper

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 10469 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: Smartie's commander reworks: USF21 Jan 2021, 12:05 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Jan 2021, 11:53 AMHannibal You have just proven exactly what I said. How many commanders there are is irrelevant to the main point. It is when the main suggest that is only one commander where there are 7 out of 9. And the following posts I pointed if the main point is that USF struggle vs mediums with their stock option without the M36 even that claim is not really supported. Jump back to quoted post21 Jan 2021, 11:53 AMHannibal Focussing on a side note is just derailing the thread for nothing. That's also why I don't want to further discuss this. Smartie made some nice suggestions that are at the very least worth discussing, I'd rather focus on that. I have not focused on anything, I simply pointed out a false claim and I would had leave it to that if people where not quoting me. My point so far is that original claim is false unless some one want to claim that is true I have no reason to add anything on the point. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Smartie's commander reworks: USF21 Jan 2021, 11:03 AM Jump back to quoted post21 Jan 2021, 10:17 AMHannibal With your response you're either implying that doctrinal units should be counted as AT for balancing of stock units (which makes the whole faction rely on doctrines then) or you are missing the actual point that Esxile made. My response is not implying anything, it is pretty clear in what it says and I am not missing Exsile's point. I have simply pointed out the error in Esxile claim: "Yeah let's nerf the Jackson because we give the faction one doctrine with a tank that can dominate the medium tank meta. Good idea. And let's call it diversity of course xD!" There not "one" doctrine with a tank that fight medium. The majority of USF doctrines have AT solution vs mediums. If you want to debate weather USF stock option are sufficient vs axis mediums without the M36 we can debate, which is another crack in Esxile's theory but his claim about the "one" commander is simply false. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Smartie's commander reworks: USF21 Jan 2021, 09:34 AM Jump back to quoted post21 Jan 2021, 09:28 AMAarotron So in your terms usfs only non doctrinal way of reliable mobile at should be replaced by crutching with doctrines to do that? Yeah no thanks. Try to read more carefully: "To claim that is only one doctrine that give an edge over medium tank is simply false." This is what I have posted so your response completely irrelevant. In addition the idea that USF have trouble vs medium without using M36 is simply false. In many of the game tournaments USF dealt with PzIV without building a single M36. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Smartie's commander reworks: USF21 Jan 2021, 09:13 AM Jump back to quoted post21 Jan 2021, 08:50 AMEsxile Yeah let's nerf the Jackson because we give the faction one doctrine with a tank that can dominate the medium tank meta. Good idea. And let's call it diversity of course xD! USF have plenty of commander with extra AT options: 4 commander with elite bazookas 1 commander with M10 1 Commander with Pershing 2 commander with dozer upgrades 1 Commander with Easy8 1 Commander with 76mm Sherman Actually out of the 9 commander there only two do not have an extra AT unit and they are both artillery commanders Infatry (Priest) and tactical support with Calliope. To claim that is only one doctrine that give an edge over medium tank is simply false. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 64 Bit Update Bug Reporting20 Jan 2021, 16:24 PM ghost of items that can not be build in specific area do not appear. In: Lobby
Thread: 64 bit question20 Jan 2021, 11:05 AM game is now 64 bit https://www.coh2.org/topic/4307/company-of-heroes-2-changelog/page/7 In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] Vehicle armor changes19 Jan 2021, 22:46 PM Problem comes from the fact that unit are balance mostly at vet 0 and veterancy overhaul has been long overdue. So some unit that have their base stat buffed become rather silly once vetted. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 64 Bit Update Bug Reporting19 Jan 2021, 17:52 PM Played a game vs UKF in alliance of defiance. One UKF was using valentine from time to time there was graphical animation that indicated aerial near (similar with the one get from Pathfinder antennas)the top left cut off when there was not unit there. In addition I had Lierneux/poltawaw veto as 2v2 map and now it show in the automatch maps In: Lobby
Thread: Finally patch is live19 Jan 2021, 10:29 AM Well done In: Lobby
Thread: Various bugs, game play issues18 Jan 2021, 16:38 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Jan 2021, 16:25 PMReverb I can try to position my units using the small colored diamonds on the map and will still be unable to position the unit on these small colored diamonds. Are you using 1 squad or more? The point work pretty accurately for me when I use I squad but one has to click without moving the cursor. In: COH2 Bugs