Profile of Vipper

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: How is the game state for people right now?19 Feb 2019, 13:56 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Feb 2019, 13:20 PMLago 1CP Pathfinders makes them incredibly awkward to put in builds: the early CP tracker isn't a consistent timer. The current cooldown based solution is much better for preventing easy Pathfinder spam. CP 0 units are map depend. For instance they can spawn allot closer to the front-line from "rail and metal" on south side than in the north. A far better solution imo would be for this units to become build able from HQ so that it does not upset the built times of faction allow numerical advantage. In: Lobby
Thread: How is the game state for people right now?19 Feb 2019, 12:39 PM In my personal opinion the game is going in wrong direction with powerful infantry early on that can brutally and frontally attack the enemy. Or powerful light vehicles that simply hold too much shock value. The use of combined arm has simply been lowered. The fire fights simply last a sort period and do not actually allow tactical movement to have meaningful impact. In: Lobby
Thread: Revamping the revamped Firestorm doctrine 19 Feb 2019, 12:19 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Feb 2019, 12:14 PMSander93 Feuersturm deserves to be looked into for sure, but the problem is that it can't be justified to buff this commander now while other factions still have lackluster commanders as well. Like USF's Rifle Company or Soviets' Defensive Tactics. Perhaps it can be done in a later minor commanders adjustments / big balance patch, but I don't see that coming anytime soon. Actually the latest patch prove the exact opposite. The latest 3 patches where fixes on revamped Commander. Relic could actually achieve allot more with many small fixes than with the continues redesign of the game. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Conscript Utility19 Feb 2019, 09:40 AM Jump back to quoted post19 Feb 2019, 02:14 AMmurky depths Don't SMGs also do AOE/splash damage? And so, even assuming each model is locked in a 1v1, the SMGs will win because they do splash damage to those around them. No flamer do AOE damage. Some weapon can "scatter" if they miss and they can re-roll to hit model behind the intended target. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Received Accuracy for OKW JLI and USF Pathfinder19 Feb 2019, 09:35 AM Jump back to quoted post19 Feb 2019, 01:25 AMLoopDloop Um That looks like a comparison to me. On a sidenote, I'm surprised you didn't bring up the obvious bit that rangers have an extra man lul. It's a fair point, but the fact that we're even comparing an elite, 3cp assault/cqc squad that costs 400 manpower/90 munitions (if we're counting upgrades) and 35 to reinforce to a 1cp support/pseudosniper (long range) infantry unit that costs 280 manpower/60 muni is an issue. Even with an extra man, that's a problem. If riflemen were man for man as tough as even obers it'd maybe arguably be a bit of an issue, let alone a squad that's actually designed to close to point blank (axis doesn't really have any exact analogues to rangers now that I think about it). It not, it would be a comparison if I posted anything about JLI. I did not. In addition once more I did not bring Rangers in this topic, OP did so your comments should be addressed to him and your quote should be his. I simply pointed out that Rangers are more durable than presented by OP. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Increase friendly fire19 Feb 2019, 00:13 AM Jump back to quoted post18 Feb 2019, 23:52 PMaerafield Is it 100% now? ... DECEMBER 19th "COMMUNITY" UPDATE (2017) 25 Pounder Base Howitzers ... Friendly-Fire AOE damage from 0.025 to 1/0.25/0.1 ... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Received Accuracy for OKW JLI and USF Pathfinder18 Feb 2019, 23:30 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Feb 2019, 22:53 PMKatitof Well, rangers cost 400mp. JLI are itty bitty cheaper then that, arrive 2 CP earlier and don't exactly need to close in. I have not compared the units in anyway, I have simply pointed out to OP that is one want to talk about that durability of Rangers one has to include to *0.9 damage reduction. Feel free to compare the units if you want to. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Received Accuracy for OKW JLI and USF Pathfinder18 Feb 2019, 22:50 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Feb 2019, 22:47 PM#12345678 I am talking Pathfinder, do not derail topic. Ranger is just a reference on the RA of the best USF infantry. You brought up Rangers not me, and if you bring them up you should bring up all their stat and not half the picture. Pls do not continue the accusations and personal remarks. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Received Accuracy for OKW JLI and USF Pathfinder18 Feb 2019, 22:45 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Feb 2019, 22:28 PM#12345678 .. P.S US Ranger: Vet 0, "0.8"; Vet 3, "0.8*0.71 = 0.568" ... Ranger also have 10% damage reduction and additional member and thus are more durable. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Possible maphacker?18 Feb 2019, 22:43 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Feb 2019, 22:03 PMcacti Just played against this soviet player that seemed to have the perfect maxim placement along with somehow being able to shell my units at certain parts without being able to see them( at least I THINK he wasn't able to, correct me if I'm wrong). This was super frustrating as he set down his maxims perfectly ( he doesn't camp his maxims, he pushes them JUST far enough without being able to see my units). I'm the OKW player, I need someone to confirm whether I just suck massive cock or is this too good to be true. https://www.coh2.org/replay/86462/me-getting-rekt PLS watch the replay from his side with fog of war on and provide times where you suspect map hack. In: COH2 Gameplay