Profile of LoopDloop

Jump back to quoted post19 Jun 2020, 15:31 PMVonManteuffel

Panzerschreck has no use on PGs: A weapon with 35 range vs. vehicles with 40+ range on a 340 manpower super fragile elite unit is a total waste of ammo and manpower. AT gun or StuG is always better.

Jump back to quoted post18 Oct 2020, 14:25 PMHannibal

I think the AoE nerf should be partially reverted. Pershing's specialty was the superior AI power while you needed to heavily support it against armor. Unfortunately the heavy patch really killed the unit and took its uniqueness.
I'd say change the mid AoE to 50, that would up the OHK radius from 0,7 to 1 meter (pre patch 1,3 or so). Might be enough, although OPs suggestions are also not bad balance wise, I'd rather have the Pershing more squishy and closer to the original design. Especially since Axis have problems against units above 300 armor, so increasing the armor would especially cause more issues.

Jump back to quoted post2 Sep 2020, 11:25 AMVipper

Imo the unit does not need to be so good at dealing with ATGs and thus requiring the expensive Panther to counter it.

Imo and since the MGs have been improved Comet should lose the WP and Grenade. This could be compensated by price decrease or something like a AP round similar to Pershing.

The utility could then be moved to Churchill that could get the WP round, have its smoke replaced with "commando" smoke providing cover status but not sight blocking and having its rear armor and AT capability reduced. Price could be adjusted.

That would create to paths. Comet for more AT oriented Churchill more AI/breakthrough/Infantry support oriented.

Jump back to quoted post1 Sep 2020, 22:27 PMGachiGasm

It have to do more with in general bad OKW tech tree and volks being frontline inf without properly being one, against anything but cons.

Same way Fallshimjaegers or JLI is better then obersts, not because of their perfomance, but because Obests are just arrive too late to make an bigger impact which Fallsh or JLI can do.