Profile of LoopDloop

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 2665

General Information


Thread: This is the biggest load of B.S. right here.Yesterday, 18:20 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Oct 2019, 11:05 AMStug life this is so fucking ironic isn't the OP using 1 game from price and some random ? ukf op confirmed https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9UaMjd53f0k&t=2118s ? If you would have read the post he just told OP why it wasn't because of balance that Price (OKW) won. You're just flailing around at everyone at this point, I worry about your blood pressure lol. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Should Axis pintle upgrade give bonus sight?Yesterday, 00:43 AM Lol it already shoots down planes almost as well as dedicated AA and adds plenty of DPS. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Jagdpanzer IV RefitYesterday, 00:41 AM Yeah because allied TDs can camo and actually have armor. JPIV is cheaper and has plenty of advantages that make it good in its own right. It just gets overshadowed by braindead panther spam. It also gets to take another hit with vet (+160hp), if that's not an awesome vet bonus I don't know what is. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Give universal carrier the 222 treatment19 Oct 2019, 02:08 AM Jump back to quoted post18 Oct 2019, 14:08 PMGarrett Because OKW has so many non-doctrinal flamer units... you alles fanboys should play some axis to get a grip of the game. Literally has flames on their mainline infantry that unlock for free 3 minutes into the game but ok. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ranger weapon choices19 Oct 2019, 01:04 AM Jump back to quoted post18 Oct 2019, 04:37 AMShadowLinkX37 Thompsons or go home +1 purely for style points. Thompsons are awesome. That being said 3x zooks is kinda viable in teamgames for strictly AT purposes but I'd theoretically personally stay away from mixing in 1s just because I'd want to maximize their efficiency at their given role. I'd rather beat infantry as hard as I can with my rangers to keep bleed down from infantry engagements and maybe give them more wiping potential and support them with some other form of AT like RE zooks or jacksons but it's probably just personal preference tbh. Ironically I really like the Recon Support paras with zooks and camo because they can still kinda contest infantry with 4 carbines and grenades too. A lot of the reason I like them is the camo and mines as well though. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Brits in 1v1 is a joke19 Oct 2019, 00:59 AM It's hilarious to me that almost every unit brits have is just a worse version of some other faction's direct counterpart except for REs, commandos, and churchills and people are still foaming at the mouth as soon as anyone suggests a rework or buff. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: How are Infantrysections since patch?15 Oct 2019, 00:02 AM Jump back to quoted post14 Oct 2019, 22:16 PMMr. Someguy +1 Brits do not need more/better emplacements. They would have been much better off without them even existing as they just justified the gaps in their lineup and made them boring to play against when emplacements were used. Now that emplacements have basically been nerfed out of the game and all the other crutch units have been balanced, brits just have half a faction lineup and nothing to show for it. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Fallschirmjager should lose snares15 Oct 2019, 00:00 AM Jump back to quoted post11 Oct 2019, 15:16 PMLago Commandos don't have that. Cloaking PGrens don't have that. JLI don't have that. Stormtroopers don't have that. Pathfinders don't have that. Why should Fallschirmjager? +1 Basically sums up the whole argument. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: How are Infantrysections since patch?13 Oct 2019, 23:56 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Oct 2019, 17:43 PMachpawel They have holes in their units lineup. Yet, I'm against any buffs to IS as they are ok imo. The latest patch was enough. I think IS are fine too, but they need to fill those gaps now because brits have no more stupid OP crutch units anymore. Jump back to quoted post13 Oct 2019, 20:13 PMJilet I smell a little salt here tho. Lmao its true. I wish they were playable because I find some aspects of the faction fun (mostly commandos lol) but they're so garbage now that it's a waste of time to even attempt to play them. It's a bit frustrating to lose to people who are clearly worse than you because you kind of just can't counter anything because you have half a faction to play with. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: How are Infantrysections since patch?13 Oct 2019, 17:11 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Oct 2019, 19:22 PMachpawel Well, I could say the same about You. You want to boost the faction which is very strong. Infantry sections just got buffed and you keep suggesting there is something wrong with them. Somebody just needs to give counterarguments as there is a real risk that buffing infantry sections will derail the whole game. Lol brits are better than which faction exactly? They have exactly one nondoctrinal mediocre infantry squad that sucks out of cover and has to get sidetechs to scale, they have the slowest sniper, puma but shittier at literally everything in literally every way (slower, less range, worse vet, horrible acceleration, bad on the move acc, worse smoke for some reason), an mg with terrible suppression, no mobile indirect, no nondoctrinal rocket arty (and the doctrinal one is easily also the worst), worst medium, and ostwind but meh. The only things they have that are legitimately good and not just worse versions of other stuff are commandos, churchill, firefly, and maybe comet. In: COH2 Balance