Profile of Vipper

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: Limit to 1 ALL heavys4 Sep 2020, 08:55 AM Jump back to quoted post3 Sep 2020, 23:37 PMProtos Angelus I don't think I've ever seen you not complain about Allies OP. To deal with KV1 as OST: P4 flank (KV1 has piss poor penetration and movement) ... I suggest you try countering a KV1 with P4 1vs1 and see what happens. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Experimental Modding for reworked USF and OST4 Sep 2020, 08:51 AM Jump back to quoted post4 Sep 2020, 01:10 AMSupport Sapper Major arty is strong and it fit a high ranking officer, move it to CPT will require to scale it down quite a lot but i want to keep the theme of high rank major have access to powerful arty. Yes that is my suggestion. Tone it down since it available earlier. Jump back to quoted post4 Sep 2020, 01:10 AMSupport Sapper i made him 4 man for easier using on frontline with arty. Still, the vision ideal is neat and i think it will work well on CPT in conjunction with the pak howie unlocked in the same tier. CPT can use a scope garand uprade instead of current m1919. i made him 4 man for easier using on frontline with arty. My suggestion is that Cap remains a fighting unit, while major a support unit and thus having less entities and thus pop. Jump back to quoted post4 Sep 2020, 01:10 AMSupport Sapper you mean reinforce cost? It is set to 35 automatically due to the 50% fomulla, but i will adjust it down to 28-30. That formula does not generally apply. Jump back to quoted post4 Sep 2020, 01:10 AMSupport Sapper if it is the base cost then i think 280 is reasonable, they start with 4 gren k98 and 0.8RA, which is sections LV and have instancly access to 2 very strong upgrade - stg and sherk. After BP2, they can event get a moving fire mg42 (i changed it to 1 from 2). If any think, their K98 can be buff by a bit. Cost is remains too high imo. That is because they already have a tech cost and will end up having less entities than IS which investing in 100 mu in ST44 a greater risk. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Comet armor and abilities3 Sep 2020, 22:27 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Sep 2020, 21:39 PMSuperHansFan OKW can drop artillery on ATG from panthers and you're here complaining about a already nerfed vet Inc shot If you want my opinion, being able to call Arty from tank commanders is badly designed ability and I even pointed out during the commander revamp. But you are comparing a doctrinal ability that takes up commander and removes the pintle mg with stock abilities of Comet and that is misleading. Jump back to quoted post3 Sep 2020, 21:39 PMSuperHansFan It's a non issue, if anything ATGs are too strong right now It is an issue since these abilities that hard counter ATG are available only to Comet. If ATG are "too strong" they should be nerfed or these abilities should become available stock to other units also. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Comet armor and abilities3 Sep 2020, 21:10 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Sep 2020, 21:04 PMSuperHansFan Without it's AI comet would just be a worse panther at same pricepoint. Comets AI is not really from its maingun, mostly MG and abilities. This would be a huge nerf I did not suggested to reduce AI, I simply pointed out that the units should not be able to counter ATG so easily. Jump back to quoted post3 Sep 2020, 21:04 PMSuperHansFan Comet is not getting nerfed to T3485 performance until you slap it down to 130f and 14pop. No one suggested to become a T-34/85. Comet already has superior armor and penetration. Jump back to quoted post3 Sep 2020, 21:04 PMSuperHansFan But feel free to make a thread complaining how "problematic it is". Now comet is finally built now Simply check who started this thread, it was not me. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Comet armor and abilities3 Sep 2020, 20:39 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Sep 2020, 20:30 PMLoopDloop Churchill with WP would probably be extremely overpowered. Having such a great AT gun counter on a tank that Axis already struggles to fight would not be a good idea. On the other hand, comet kind of needs that utility to justify the fact that it has like half the HP of the churchill. Making hamer and anvil that specialized would also lead to frustrating games where the opponent just hardcounters whatever tech you pick in the lategame since its not like brits have a very diverse and versatile unit roster to begin with. No. I simply do not see why Comet should be able to counter ATG better than other main battle tanks. War speed/grenade combo and WP allow Comet to counter ATG and cause part of the current problems with it. If Churchill is superior option it needs a nerf. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Sander's personal balance changes3 Sep 2020, 17:54 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Sep 2020, 17:39 PMSander93 You've left out penetration in your comparison, which is decisively in favour of the Panzerschreck at 160 vs 110 at max range for Bazookas and PIATs. Guaranteed penetration against any Allied medium vs a 61-47% chance to pen a Panzer IV. Ones pays more fuel for the extra armor and hand held AT weapon do deflection damage regardless. Given the cost difference between PG and RE/Ro.E imo the later are quite more cost efficient. When compared with Ranger/Paras with a similar cost they could far less effective. Jump back to quoted post3 Sep 2020, 17:39 PMSander93 Scatter/collision hits are almost non existent on handheld AT with the huge scatter values on Bazookas and Schrecks (16 scatter angle and 15 distance max) while PIATs have very slow projectiles (when they don't track on a hit-roll they will likely miss if the vehicle is moving). I am not sure the claim is accurate. 1) Scatter distance max is the upper and thus it is not very informative.In addition high scatter distance max is not necessarily a bad thing, combined with distance offset make the projectile travel further way and thus actually increase the chance of collision hits on retreating vehicle. 2) Max values might be higher but on the other hand ratio is lower than other AT weapon which means that the weapon scatters less with distance. 3) The problem has more to do with scatter angle but even then its more 50/50 if the vehicle is moving perpendicular Jump back to quoted post3 Sep 2020, 17:39 PMSander93 In terms of cost efficiency, Panzergrenadiers and Panzerfusiliers also have better veterancy bonuses with +40% accuracy compared to +20% for RET, +25% for Rangers/Paras and +0% for REs. The latter do get -50% reload in cover but that's not of too much use when chasing tanks. So still with these changes I would not consider Panzerschrecks to become any less cost efficient than they currently are. They also have higher vet requirement while accuracy bonus for RET comes at vet 1. As For USF elites they can stay on the battlefield much longer. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Experimental Modding for reworked USF and OST3 Sep 2020, 17:41 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Sep 2020, 17:18 PMSupport Sapper About LT LT carbine do have a close range profile so i think i will change all squad to carbine... ... In game M1 and M1 Carbine are fall both under the category "carabine" and are more Mid oriented. Suggestion of SMG is so that LT offers something "unique" instead of more of the same. Jump back to quoted post3 Sep 2020, 17:18 PMSupport Sapper Cpt: I also want to give him a carbine but end up with an invisible gun so i have to go back with the thompson. Probably there is no animation for the weapon. Jump back to quoted post3 Sep 2020, 17:18 PMSupport Sapper I do think of give him off map but dont want it to overlap with major. The suggestion is removed the arty from major so Captain also bring something unique then major is basically support. Jump back to quoted post3 Sep 2020, 17:18 PMSupport Sapper Major: As you can see, i already move supervises to him, and will try the rest of your ideas. Yes that is a good change. The unit can stay with 3 model (or even one for less pop)and be more of support with supervision if in base, FRP if outside base and vision if in frontline. 280/35 That price is too high for PG with 4 K98. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Experimental Modding for reworked USF and OST3 Sep 2020, 17:02 PM What is the price for PGs with K98? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Comet armor and abilities3 Sep 2020, 16:49 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Sep 2020, 16:26 PMmadin2 The comet is only better when u use phosphor shells which came at vet 1 and cost u munitions and don't kill anything but only lower the hp. If u drive behind an at gun the panther with pintle mg and the comet, again perform the same. As far as I can remember Comet's WP can kills (unless it has been patched) even if it does not kill it is irrelevant, it add DPS to units output. WP is a good ability. Panther does not have a grenade... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Comet armor and abilities3 Sep 2020, 16:16 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Sep 2020, 15:50 PMmadin2 Before the buff the comet was worse then a panther against ai with pintle mg, now the are the same. Go and test it on the cheat mod!!! The only scenario a comet is better against ai is when the squad is clumped but that's also very inconsistent due to the bad accuracy against infantry MGs are effected by cover, by moving, while there difficult to aim. AI guns are less effected. In addition Comet comes with grenades and WP. To put simply if I was facing infatry or support weapons I would rather have a Comet than a Panther. In: COH2 Balance