Profile of SkysTheLimit

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: Tank Destroyer Standardization18 Mar 2020, 20:26 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Mar 2020, 20:03 PMProtos Angelus I literally said that and you just repeat xD "makes it a tank that if you have to retreat with it and you're not flanked/ambushed, you're playing it wrong." But it CAN escape flanks and ambushes, that's my entire point. Its superior moving accuracy and great mobility means that it can run away and fight back reliably, while other tanks are missing shots In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Tank Destroyer Standardization18 Mar 2020, 18:18 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Mar 2020, 15:57 PMblvckdream Vetted SU85 is faster than Jackson, do I need to say more? Yeah you do... Ever heard of moving accuracy? Ever heard of a turret? p4s and panthers have blitz, speed alone isnt going to help you, ability to fight back is just as important And again...what game type? FF is great in team games Jump back to quoted post18 Mar 2020, 18:02 PMProtos Angelus Jackson is a king of speed and maneuverability. It's a tank with a position and role brilliantly defined. Glass cannon by definition. It needs no nerfs/buffs. And Jackson can't really escape any ambush. He didn't say it needed any buffs, and if your Jackson gets ambushed to begin with then you were being way too aggressive or you made a mistake. It has 60 range for a reason In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Tank Destroyer Standardization18 Mar 2020, 15:55 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Mar 2020, 15:50 PMblvckdream FF is by far the worst TD. Not sure how people think it's somehow good. Super vulnerable to blitzing P4s or Panthers, super vulnerable against ATGs and handheld AT. In which gametype are you talking about? Cause FF is great in team games. Tulips are even more useful cause the stun can setup flanks by your allies Su85 isn't vulnerable to being blitzed? I'd say its just as vulnerable if not more because of no turret In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Raketens are too good17 Mar 2020, 22:13 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Mar 2020, 21:30 PMLoopDloop Getting rid of retreat would fix the last bits of the cheese with this unit. Would like that very much. Give it a 6th man with vet or some more RA if it needs some kind of compensation The retreat function was really what made the old camo OP. If it couldn't retreat you would've been giving away a fee Rak everytime you tried to cloak creep behind enemy lines In: COH2 Balance
Thread: infantry balance17 Mar 2020, 22:09 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Mar 2020, 20:27 PMWiderstreit I think it is THE MG where placing matters most. And with 6 men it can be a. fuk OR b. unkill-able with merge. I think you mean it needs cons to merge with it just to keep it alive. The death loop consistently makes the 6 men crew absolutely meaningless The maxim is just awful, I don't understand how some people can still debate this In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Fallshrims got completely neutered over the years17 Mar 2020, 22:02 PM I really don't feel like they overlap with obers. Camo that gives a first strike bonus is solid and Obers do not have that. You also can't airdrop obers on the field In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Raketens are too good16 Mar 2020, 20:09 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Mar 2020, 14:00 PMFelinewolfie Correct. Higher than PAK43/88. Higher than Allied 17 Pounder Emplacement. Might be historically correct, but it's not at all correct based on it's role in CoH2 Why does anyone bring realism/history into these discussions? Once you see medium tanks of any kind requiring 4 penetrating shots to kill, you should know damn well that history and realism aren't the main factors in balance In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Give Axis panzers 40 sight16 Mar 2020, 20:01 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Mar 2020, 19:28 PMShadowLinkX37 We were this close to no one responding and letting it die. Only in a moderator's dreams This change would effect way more than the matchup between axis tanks and allied TDs. That extra vision is helpful against just about anything In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Panther Accuracy14 Mar 2020, 16:26 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Mar 2020, 09:39 AMSander93 I happened to check the editor yesterday, and the OKW Panther gets +25% base accuracy (so not moving accuracy) at vet 5. Which together with the vet 4 scatter bonus makes it extremely accurate (in a test, stationary at max range versus an SU-85, it missed only 1 shot out of 20-30). Getting it to vet 5 is a problem though, since the requirement is ~18k xp which is a hell of a lot for a unit like the Panther. Oh that's good to know. Veterancy guide is out of date or just wrong then Either way like you said a vet 5 panther is a rare sight, and that leaves the ost panther with nothing still. I think a vet 2 bonus would be appropriate In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Panther Accuracy14 Mar 2020, 00:01 AM Panther should get more accuracy with vet. Ost currently gets no accuracy bonus, okw version gets moving accuracy but it's at vet 5 In: COH2 Balance