Profile of blvckdream

Jump back to quoted post18 Oct 2019, 22:15 PMgbem

the JP4 can counter the churchill pretty well as it isnt that well armored... its just very beefy... it struggles against the IS-2/ISU but thats doctrinal

isnt the IS-2 doctrinal aswell?

Jump back to quoted post18 Oct 2019, 18:25 PMSully

I would much rather have the JP4 reliably penetrate allied heavies than have a higher ROF over other TDs. I rarely if ever feel it is a better option to go JP4 vs allied mediums over a P4 that has a similar cost/timing and the ability to combat infantry.

Jump back to quoted post18 Oct 2019, 16:56 PMSander93

Out of curiosity, any proof (a good amount of personal experience playing 2v2s counts) for that? Because I play UKF in 3v3s and they are still very strong in team games. I personally haven't really noticed a difference since the patch (quite the opposite actually, as their lategame got a pretty decent buff because Comets are good now) except I'll have to get Brens a bit more often. I still see plenty of UKF players in 3v3s.

Jump back to quoted post18 Oct 2019, 08:21 AMStug life

Yea they totally nerfed Brits I mean , they reduced FF price, buffed vicker, buffed comet ,buffed all emplacement with refund,buffed Cromwell, buffed late game IS, buffed price of IS

They nerfed Churchill price by 5 and pop cap

Bofors now does not counter tanks too

IS are not god at 5 men but still have the same DPS and better DPS with lmg thanks to no overkill now

Jump back to quoted post17 Oct 2019, 21:18 PMinsaneHoshi

If 0 armour came with a turret? Hell yes! For similar reasons is why puma is a god tier unit. How much armour it has doesnt matter when you have the mobility and range not to be hit.

No one is saying having good Armour is terrible. People are saying that having high Armour, on a unit that is meant not to be hit, isnt a worthwhile tradeoff vs high damage, high pen, mobility and having a turret.