Profile of Vipper

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: Advanced Emplacements Regiment Redesign6 May 2019, 13:02 PM Imo emplacement should simply be redesign around and re-balanced with their performance tied to Hammer/anvil path (which could be unlocked in stages). Counter battery should be move to the arty commander regardless. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Veterancy should be stated in detail6 May 2019, 12:59 PM Jump back to quoted post6 May 2019, 12:24 PMOsinyagov I just mentioned the other side of the work, which need to be done for polished implementation of numerical veterancy description. IMO encyclopedia(if i correctly imagine what you mean) can‘t be useful during the battle, better to give proper information throw current veterancy UI system. Veterancy bonuses are necessary during battle, although one could make it available if there was a need. Once could even have it available in steam since one can open steam during play. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Maxim change ideas6 May 2019, 12:55 PM Jump back to quoted post6 May 2019, 12:10 PMKatitof And how are you going to solve anti garrison issue then? With more T0 units? OKW HQ already looks like DoW2 HQ. There are plenty of solutions: Incendiary grenade could have its range reduced and its DOT affect "all in garrison" Incendiary grenade could become available to SP and doctrinal infatry Smoke delivery time for Le.ig (and all mortars) could be reduced Li.eg could be swapped with the GrW43 Mortar Stuka could changed to fire only 2 incendiary round per barrage and re-balanced Stuka could be replaced by MHT and re-balanced VG could get a rifle-grenade upgrade similar to R.E. and so on... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostrruppen 6 May 2019, 12:03 PM My suggestion about Osttruppen would be remove LMG upgrade allow an upgrade in the same spirit to the one conscripts get in the patch. The Upgrade the unit to Ostlegionen/Osteinheiten could change the unit to remove the cover mechanism and perfome closer to conscripts. Could include target size 1, merge, grenade and maybe At riflers. In: Lobby
Thread: Maxim change ideas6 May 2019, 11:55 AM The problem start with effectiveness of the incendiary grenade. Lower the effectiveness or even replace it with frag and half the problem will be gone. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: "Lockdown" for AT units.6 May 2019, 11:40 AM Jump back to quoted post6 May 2019, 09:48 AMTiger Baron ... One could test moving Tulips to Hammer and a lock down mode to Anvil increasing ROF. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Veterancy should be stated in detail6 May 2019, 11:01 AM Jump back to quoted post6 May 2019, 10:38 AMOsinyagov It‘s a lot of works. It‘s not only to change veterancy description, it is also adding new strings, because several units can use the same string for their veterancy. You can check out the list in my signature (lack of text strings), and i am sure it‘s not the full list. It probably easier to have an in game encyclopedia. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: OKW Core changes commander Revamp Patch6 May 2019, 10:05 AM Jump back to quoted post6 May 2019, 09:05 AMSander93 By definition the Panzer II Luchs is a reconnaissance tank, and yet in the game it functions as a light tank. It's almost as if real life combat roles and weapon/vehicle charactaristics are sometimes bent into different roles in the game to serve gameplay. An extra shell per barrage is not weak. As for vet 5 the +20% damage increase is pretty huge. Half the reduced scatter perhaps, but its base scatter values are much better. Better scatter for all fire modes is also much more valuable mid-late game (when you largely rely on autofire) than just a barrage scatter reduction other mortars get. You're forgetting that the ISG has better scatter values, which largely offset its slightly lower AOE profile. In both autofire and barrage it also has higher ROF because it doesn't have as much wind up and wind down time as other mortars. ISG has 8.925s reload vs 10.625s reload of GrW 34 for autofire; and 5.075s vs 5.5s for barrage. Vet 5 according to your post is +15% not 20% and that is great but the Leig hit the field later than mortars and by the time it reaches vet 5 i dough it impact would be sufficient. My points stand the unit comes later the mortar is more expensive and it is less cost efficient both in base performance and when equally vetted. (since it can not retreat or used behind shot blocker effectively) Compared to the M1 Pack OKW it greatly inferior. As a faction the OKW going T1 has more need than USF has, for what you describe as "a howitzer role ingame" since USF has more stock and doctrinal options. Note that USF has little reason to have superior direct fire weapon than Ostheer this early in the game after their changes in tech. Even with changes in vet the unit will remain mediocre although it one of the few indirect fire options for OKW. Again one can simply swap it with the mortar that better fits the faction while fixing many issues in the process. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: NEW COMMANDER PREVIEW - 7.0 version6 May 2019, 09:51 AM Jump back to quoted post6 May 2019, 09:15 AMStark Putting aside Brit faction, what you do guys think about new Dshk? Thanks to new changes (higher arc of fire) it's super effective in certain maps and can deal even with ostheer lights which makes it quite hard to counter. With new conscript changes new Dshk spam may return like in old days. I personally think the arc of fire could stay but unit itself should have 5 model squad to compasate their performance Dshk need to have sprint removed. The ability should not be available to HMGs. In addition with new penetration values both 0.50 and Dshk can have the AP rounds become a vet 1 ability. The close DPS at vet 3 needs to go down since its very high. The real problem thou is that with new commander the Dshk crew can be armed with SVT making the HMG extremely difficult to flank. In: Lobby
Thread: OKW Core changes commander Revamp Patch6 May 2019, 08:27 AM Jump back to quoted post5 May 2019, 23:31 PMthedarkarmadillo To be fair the leig has the potential to sit beside a combo of healing building and tech bunker. Which we all witnessed. And hated. Because it was cancer. I'm OK with the one that requires the least effort to produce results improve the least in its category. With changes in range, not really, unless the map is really small. In: COH2 Balance