Profile of Vipper

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: Cromwell MGs12 Oct 2019, 07:23 AM Jump back to quoted post11 Oct 2019, 11:23 AMKatitof Underperforming means it needs buff. You'd rather see the gun having lower scatter or reload and significantly increase one shot wipe potential or have MGs buffed to increase AI reliability that way? In fact, I believe that T34 approach to MGs should be how AI is balanced for all generalist tanks. Your claim that according to patch notes T-34/76 has "shit perfomance in its main gun" is simply false. That is actually your own personal opinion and if you want to back it up I suggested you provide a comparison of the guns of meduim tanks including AOE profiles, scatter and reload values or in game tests. If you want to do so pls do it in another thread since this one is about Cromwell's mgs. Now pls move on. When it comes to Cromwell I would suggeset a redesing to a "flank tank" (for T-34/76 also) a unit with improved perfomance at close with higher penetration and reload at close range. I see litle reason why the main gun of most vehicles have the same reload at all ranges. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Cromwell MGs11 Oct 2019, 11:22 AM Jump back to quoted post11 Oct 2019, 08:59 AMKatitof Actually, the shit performance of main gun is the reason and since you learn patch notes by heart, you're more then well aware of it. Patch notes do not mention anything about a "shit perfomance of main gun". PLS stop invetning thing that are in patch notes only according to you. "Developer Comments: We felt the T-34/76 was under performing and needed some improvements to help deal with infantry." And this does not change the fact this value are way higher than most other vehicles and an overhaul is needed. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Cromwell MGs11 Oct 2019, 11:15 AM most of the tank mg power should come from hull mg for all tank. That would prevent them from easily circle strafing ATG and would reward better placement. And as mentioned before there should be an overhaul to all vehcile mg since both the profiles and DPS all over the place. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The COH2 Ability Guide Mark 2.011 Oct 2019, 08:57 AM Jump back to quoted post10 Oct 2019, 19:09 PMOsinyagov Can you please provide period of time ,when this patch was? I may have missed that. it in December patch notes and not in change log if i rember correctly. In: Guides
Thread: Cromwell MGs11 Oct 2019, 08:50 AM mg on vehicles are mess and they should come inline. On the other hand soviet mg are way too powerful. There is little reason for 2 mg to have the same DPS of the 3 especailly since pintle has mu cost. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The COH2 Ability Guide Mark 2.09 Oct 2019, 23:24 PM UKF Commanods Name: "First Strike" Duration: Passive Ability Cost: Free +50% accuracy for 5 seconds out of camouflage. Are you sure about the bonuses? patch notes say moving speed at vet 2 In: Guides
Thread: Rifles overperforming?9 Oct 2019, 21:22 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Oct 2019, 21:13 PMelchino7 In this thread. Between the guys we were talking with. No In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Rifles overperforming?9 Oct 2019, 20:43 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Oct 2019, 20:01 PMelchino7 Did someone brought that point up? Yes I have read it plenty of times. Not very recently thou. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Rifles overperforming?9 Oct 2019, 19:38 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Oct 2019, 18:59 PMelchino7 I didn't say they scale bad (NOW), that is something more complex than just vet. I've specifically said that their vet is the worst. YOUR OPINION is that it's equivalent to Paras/Rangers. I don't think that the case and we can still agree to disagree. It would still put it in the lower end of the spectrum. Someone has to be the worst, that doesn't mean it's imbalanced. I can easily agree with that. And I did not posted that you personally have made a claim that commandos are UP. The problem is that other users pick up lines like that and they repeat them again and again using them as an argument to prove that the unit is in someway lacking. Then myths are created that hold no water at all. For instance for years this myth was repeated that Sherman somehow had a disadvantage because it had HE round and it had to switch to engage tanks. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Rifles overperforming?9 Oct 2019, 18:43 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Oct 2019, 18:14 PMelchino7 He will always find something to comment on and will casually not state in numbers the exact thing that might make his comment rebuttal look worse (19% difference in RA). Also, it's not like he can read the context of what was been discussed. Reminder that the whole point of the discussion was why Falls (post buff/pre nerf) were a worst offender than Commandos with their cheese back then. Read my post again I clearly state the difference: Jump back to quoted post9 Oct 2019, 17:35 PMVipper Vet 3 0.9 received accuracy, Squad drops a big smoke grenade on retreat vs -20% weapon cooldown, -29% received accuracy point goes to Paras All and all better RA accuracy bonus (but worse total number) vs 0.5 accuracy and -20% weapon CD on top of that Commandos get healing earlier a smoke grenade and smoke bomb on retreat. I would call them in line. And actually the difference is 22% not 19% but commandos end up having better RA. And as for context, I have clearly stated that I am pointing out that the myth about commandos and their veterancy simply does not hold any water. Unit has great bases stats and thus its vet bonuses are inferior but inline with other elite units. Unit is cost efficient both at Vet 0 and at vet 3. In: COH2 Balance