Profile of Vipper

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: Stug Vet18 Oct 2019, 16:45 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Oct 2019, 16:27 PMJibberJabberJobber Cool idea. +100% penetration for multiple shots might be a bit too much though, compared to similar abilities. +40-50% would be better. What should be done with Stug E's vet 1 ability you think? Agreed 100% seem a bit too much. On the other hand I would rather see stationary camo on stug as a vet 1 ability. I would try hollow charge AT rounds with low damage penetration maybe some deflection damage. The unit is a bit expensive for an AI only unit and imo should be able to defend it self vs light tanks. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Summerpatch Bugreport18 Oct 2019, 16:41 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Oct 2019, 16:13 PMMon And can anyone confirm these are bugs ? Ty - Tank Hunter Tactics : in description says dePMD-6M light mines can be place by combat engineers and conscripts but penal battalion can place it too As far as I know penal access to mines is not a bug the description is wrong Jump back to quoted post18 Oct 2019, 16:13 PMMon - AEC : Target Tread unlocked before veterancy rank 1 abilities involves 2 shot the second one that stuns should be locked behind vet 1 Jump back to quoted post18 Oct 2019, 16:13 PMMon - Comet : Grenades defend unlocked before veterancy rank 3 Comet has 2 grenades 1 manual one auto Jump back to quoted post18 Oct 2019, 16:13 PMMon - QF 17-Pounder : Piercing Shot unlocked before veterancy rank 1 7 Pounder Anti-Tank Nest * Population from 20 to 14 * Reload from 5.7 to 5.5 * Can no longer garrison troops * Weapon range UI indicator added * Flares moved to veterancy 1 * Piercing Rounds now available at veterancy 0 Most of them seem wrong description and not bugs. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Wehr weak penetration18 Oct 2019, 15:58 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Oct 2019, 15:54 PMLago The price of the Tiger includes BP3 if you'd stay in T3 otherwise. Same goes for Soviet: if you otherwise planned to stay in T3 for some reason, an IS-2 would set you back 880 MP 320 FU. Then you original claim that "The Comet's a jumped up T-34/85 for the price of an IS-2" does not hold water in 1vs1 games where one can afford to built 1 (maybe 2) T4 apart from IS-2, in most cases.... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Wehr weak penetration18 Oct 2019, 15:21 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Oct 2019, 14:59 PMLago You tech Hammer to get the Comet. ... An over simplification that is misleading. One techs to Hammer and most of the unit benefit. Vehicles get hammer trucking and warspeed and tommies gammon bombs. They also get access to Croc. Now what is the price for a Croc is it 880 and 320? Does the price of the Tiger includes the BP3 upgrade? Is suddenly Tiger more expensive than IS-2? One can make the same claim, one techs to T4 to get IS-2 now the IS-2 cost 880 and 320 In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Wehr weak penetration18 Oct 2019, 14:53 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Oct 2019, 14:48 PMLago ... And the sidetech to unlock it is 200 MP 50 FU. Both units have a tech now. Taking into account only the "hammer" cost and damping all the cost in the production of single vehicles is simply misleading especially since the vehicle is not even limited to one. One could easily argue the cost of the IS-2 includes the cost of T4 applying the same logic. In addition "hammer" provides Hammer trucking, Gammon bombs and "warspeed" and it actually one of the most cost efficient tech (and not exactly a side tech). In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Wehr weak penetration18 Oct 2019, 14:43 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Oct 2019, 14:20 PMLago ... The Comet's a jumped up T-34/85 for the price of an IS-2. That is a bit of an exaggeration, the price of of Comet is 480/175 while the price of the IS-2 is 640/230 In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Wehr weak penetration18 Oct 2019, 14:17 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Oct 2019, 14:06 PMKatitof And then, there is comet and M4C sherman. If you are claiming that Comet and M4C Sherman have bad AI pls provide proof. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Give universal carrier the 222 treatment18 Oct 2019, 14:11 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Oct 2019, 14:05 PMLago Increasing the WASP's health would make the 222 take a little longer to kill it. It'd still get splattered by medium armour up. Maybe a smoke canister instead, unlocked after either the WASP or Vickers is purchased? That'd help the UC to survive throughout the whole game, and early on it you could use it to blind MGs, something UKF desperately needs now it can't just overwhelm everything with the Great Section Horde. Imo the 222 is a separate issue. The 222 imo should be delayed and have better armor (with an adjusted cost) and/or have it use AP rounds option. (Acting a bit more like an light vehicle than a glass cannon) As counter to micro light vehicle Ostheer could have access to (redesigned more penetration less DPS) 221 that would act a soft counter to them a similar cost. Unit could even be available from t1. Giving access to wasp earlier (maybe at a cost of 220 40 MU and maybe a bit longer built time to prevent spam) would allow UKF to clear garrison. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Give universal carrier the 222 treatment18 Oct 2019, 14:01 PM Guess one could try another approach for the Wasp: One could make it a separate vehicle instead of an upgrade and move the DOT damage to vet 1 ability or completely remove it. Then the unit could have its cost and timing adjusted to act more like a flamer engineer then a vehicle that has to turn as many enemy unit as it can into a crisp before being obliterate by vehicles. (one could make self repair cost a bit more the Faust but remove engine critical first after a couple of seconds) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Wehr weak penetration18 Oct 2019, 12:58 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Oct 2019, 12:52 PMLago I don't recall ever saying the Elefant needs to be more accurate. I said I have no problem with a tank destroyer having 100% chance to hit and penetrate a vehicle. They don't need a token bounce chance for the sake of it. I did not say all tank destroyers need 100% chance to hit and penetrate. That's absurd. And why do you seem to have a problem with some and not with others? Which ones are Ok to have 100% chance to hit and penetrate and which are not? And against what vehicle and with what criteria? In: COH2 Balance