Profile of Vipper

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: Unusual Ostheer Suggestion8 Mar 2020, 16:31 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Mar 2020, 14:30 PMblancat It's just whining. OST has no problem with late game. The reason the OST infantry is a 4man squad is designed to fight with the support weapon team and has already received numerous buffs Stop being greedy. If you need a 5man squad, do OKW instead of Ost Yet USF have better mainline infatry and equally good support weapons. Just check the number of support weapons used in the World championship. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW Command Tiger Aura8 Mar 2020, 16:26 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Mar 2020, 14:04 PMSuperHansFan This is why I'm against buffs to the command P4 itself. The comparison is ridiculous. Command PzIV has one of the worse gun in the game. On to pic the funny thing is the KV-8 and KV-2 have an ability with no penalties to vehicles and in away they are better "Command vehicles" than the "Command Tiger" In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: What is the REAL problem with Ost T4?8 Mar 2020, 09:45 AM Jump back to quoted post8 Mar 2020, 09:43 AMToxicfirebal Would the Stug E than be in T3 or 4? A viable solution would be: Stug-E at T3 OStwind to T4 with a price reduction so that is cheaper than T-34/76 Brumbar to doctrines redesigned as KV-2 That would provide Ostheer with: Some T3 indirect fire support which they lack after the mortar nerfs Make skipping T3 viable with Ostwind Add a different Super heavy to Ostheer. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Premium medium and sub-heavy tanks in team games8 Mar 2020, 09:41 AM Simple nerf the TDs and their high probability of doing damage (hit and penetrate) from max range. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Is the T70 OP?8 Mar 2020, 07:55 AM Jump back to quoted post8 Mar 2020, 05:29 AMClarity I would also say another factor is how you define the term "OP", do you think it means overpowered or over performing which is maybe more like borderline overpowered or maybe only slightly stronger than it should be. Versus the unit being overpowered meaning it needs significant nerfs. I personally use the term over performing for cost. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Is the T70 OP?8 Mar 2020, 00:36 AM Jump back to quoted post8 Mar 2020, 00:10 AMHannibal To be honest Vipper it does not make sense arguing if your point of view is basucally reworking tech and timings of basically all factions is fine to fix one unit. It's not feasible for this game and not a good strategy to fix anything at all. Especially when apparently most people agree that the timings of other factions is fine. The T70 is not a perfectly designed unit, but the issues are not large enough that it would warrant huge reworks. If this really is your opinion, then we're just too far apart to be able to reach any insight and even less agreement Well it not just one unit, the T-70. The 222 currently is OP because "it has to be". The same goes nearly most cars (WC51, m20, m3). People also complain about the Stuart and so on. The timing of many units should be delayed in order for this units to payback for the resources invested in them. It also part of the balance issue Ostheer is facing. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Panzer IV Command Tank7 Mar 2020, 19:42 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Mar 2020, 19:08 PMelchino7 Believe it or not, some meta some niche. It always rounded up certain commanders. Fortified armor: when your main issue with getting your Ele countered was mass Guard buttoning. ... Did panzer tactician fix protect you from button anyway? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Panzer IV Command Tank7 Mar 2020, 19:35 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Mar 2020, 19:33 PMKatitof That means, as per your own words regarding dshk, it was "hidden op", it was op all along, it simply wasn't utilized enough for people to see it until it was. Not really, the commander was simply badly designed since it allow no tech access to both AT and AI units in faction with little whole in their roster. The PzIV could not and still can not carry a commander. Take for instance the Elephant commander where Jagger armored commander see allot more use than the Fortified armor commander that provides an C. PzIV. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Panzer IV Command Tank7 Mar 2020, 19:29 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Mar 2020, 18:54 PMelchino7 The effect was there to counter old levels of lethality and only on owned territories which made the unit clunky to use. It used to be applied to the whole sector at the time which made it map de pedant and OP. As for the modifier it was fine for years and become a problem only with mobile defense. Jump back to quoted post7 Mar 2020, 18:54 PMelchino7 For it to gain 20% DR back, it would have to follow one of this options: -Munition based active ability. 10% Passive, increased to 20% for a certain duration of time. -20% DR only on your own tanks. 10% only on allied ones and your own infantry (due to recent Gren change). -+10% when units are on owned territories. I basically agree with changes to auras and imo it should also scale with veterancy. On the other hand the unit need to be looked at, it needs CP restriction removed , a better gun, vet bonuses/abilities suited for the unit, different XP value and so on... For the gun it could use 2 modes direct maybe with a Kv-8 profile and indirect with stug-E at normal range. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Is the T70 OP?7 Mar 2020, 19:17 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Mar 2020, 18:39 PMelchino7 A tank is a vehicle. Not all vehicles are tank. A T70 is both, a 222 or AA HT is not. You are discussing semantics. I am not I am simply point out that both the T-70 and the Stuart are immune to small arm fire and ignore HMG AP rounds. Jump back to quoted post7 Mar 2020, 18:39 PMelchino7 And you keep ignoring the other points i make and you try to make it sound as it is an OKW issue as well. It arrives later than ALL OTHER FACTIONS light vehicles/tanks due to teching placement. And once more that is not a problem. Reduce price so it can come early tone down and delay OKW Puma and it will still be fine. Then you will have a light vehicle phase and after that a light tank phase. Jump back to quoted post7 Mar 2020, 18:39 PMelchino7 And for some reason you are asking for a further buff to OKW T2 when no one opens up with a Pumas as first option unless been based camped against USF and they already have a Stuart on the field. Unless you forgot to include the P2, that's a really stupid idea. Instead of 6 mins P2 we have 5 mins P2. No I am not asking for buff to T2. I am asking for OKW truck to arrive at the same time so that Faust timing and support weapons access would be the same. The T2 build could include more support weapons/weapons upgrades and not have to rush LV. The price and/or timing of the engineer upgrade can be adjusted to fix any timing/cost issues. The idea is that tech arrives at the same time regardless of route and the timing of vehicles can remain the same of adjusted as needed. Jump back to quoted post7 Mar 2020, 18:39 PMelchino7 You want to rework 4 factions light vehicle timing, fuel costs, upgrades, mp expenditure to accommodate to what you consider is the ideal design of Ostheer and timings. It's not just OKW, USF and UKF have similar timings with their lights. Ideally yes because currently it is mess. In: COH2 Balance