Profile of Vipper

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: What is the REAL problem with Ost T4?6 Mar 2020, 13:57 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Mar 2020, 13:15 PMJibberJabberJobber FF pop isn't inflated, but Churchill pop definitely is. I think it was increased from 16 to 18 initially, but afterwards to 20, almost directly following CaptainSprice losing to AshaBlois in some tourney. Sprice only had Schrecks and Stugs and slowly got suffocated by triple Churchills. IMO Price played that match wrong and the additional pop nerf was not justified. I'll try to find the match once I can. Pop of Churchill is 19. Oddly enough the pop of KV-1 is 14... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What is the REAL problem with Ost T4?6 Mar 2020, 13:01 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Mar 2020, 12:30 PMSuperHansFan Churchill should be same pop as panther or comet. It needed a small price increase and that was it, nobody builds the FF church combo anymore because both their pop is inflated. FF pop is not inflated. Here is the Pop of other "heavy TDs" Panther 18 M-36 16 Su-85 15 FF 16 Actually SU-85 should have it pop increased to 16. (And KV-1 to at 16). Now can we move back to OStheer 4? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Unrealized commanders.6 Mar 2020, 10:15 AM This are just portraits as far as I know Commanders that where designed but not implemented are: No Retreat No Surrender (Soviet) Overwhelming Armor (Soviet) Defense in Depth (Soviet) Heavy Armor Doctrine (Ostheer) Urban assault Doctrine (Ostheer) There was another ostheer commander with resources manipulation. Urban Breakout Doctrine (Oberkommando West) some abilities are described here: https://www.coh2.org/topic/81491/suggestions-for-commanders-revamp/page/1#post_id691928 In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: HMG-34 in DPP 6 Mar 2020, 08:57 AM Jump back to quoted post6 Mar 2020, 07:12 AMmrgame2 Ban this okw noob. Stinky axis asking for buff always! In closing this thread actually the MOD team agreed with the point I raised and made the following changes initially, later on they decreased XP value also: DECEMBER 19th 2019 MG 34 Heavy Machine Gun The MG-34 has been adjusted to deal more damage against infantry and to allow it to gain veterancy more quickly. Cost and population adjusted appropriately. Cost from 230 to 250 Damage from 2 to 3 Population from 5 to 6 Veterancy 4 received accuracy bonus to 0.9 from 0.85 Veterancy 5 accuracy bonus from 1.15 to 1.08 SEPTEMBER 2019 MG 34 HMG The MG 34 performs well in its role as a suppression platform, but its lower damage compared to other HMGs makes it difficult to gain veterancy. Requirements have been lowered to compensate. Veterancy requirements from 400/800/1600/2132/2666 to 360/720/1440/1918/2400 In: Lobby
Thread: Artillery Flares-Early Warning5 Mar 2020, 18:21 PM UKF "Early warning" is a similar ability. Jump back to quoted post5 Mar 2020, 18:14 PMEtherealDragon What if they reworked it so that it could only be fired a certain radius from either a set up SWS or give OKW a "Recon Opel" similar to Strategic Reserves 251 HT. The strategy reserves ability "mobile observation post" is rather weak. I would rather see it renamed to "observation post" and have it also add 5 vision to bunker and allow the to fire flares also. A similar change should also be done to UKF Forward observation post. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Is the T70 OP?4 Mar 2020, 22:05 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Mar 2020, 19:46 PMSander93 We actually looked into something similar but an Ostheer 221 would have a major readability issue with the OKW 221. And using the OKW 221 would be such a significant downgrade in durability that it'd likely be a net nerf. The current implementation of the 221/223 is bad. Make them separate units. Redesign the 221 as a cheap counter to sniper and cars. Adjust price Redesigning 223 as an economical/support unit unit only with little fighting power. Adjust price. On the matter of inconsistencies they already exist. The Luch and 222 use guns not only with different stats but also with completely different mechanism. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Is the T70 OP?4 Mar 2020, 15:07 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Mar 2020, 14:28 PMT.R. Stormjäger The resurgence of mobile defense means the Su76 is even more fucked than it was. Puma runs circles around it. Try using a snare or mine... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Is the T70 OP?4 Mar 2020, 11:32 AM Jump back to quoted post4 Mar 2020, 11:27 AMSquishyMuffin . Didn't you know? Buying more than one unit is 'spamming' . If you know you're playing well against your opponnent going double T70 isn't unheard of and currently can seal the deal imo. Same for OKW, though luchs isn't as outright strong. And if you're behind the enemy going hardcore T3 as SOV is a worthwhile strat to invest in anyway, to keep playing for enemy mistakes then into heavy (double T70 for ai and SU76+PTRS's (the supposed/forgotten counter to a medium no xD). Well on the bright Su-76 might see some action so that people stop asking for buffs for it....and anything moving the meta from super heavy tank would help. As I said worth testing In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Is the T70 OP?4 Mar 2020, 11:13 AM Jump back to quoted post4 Mar 2020, 11:04 AMSquishyMuffin I thought "yeessss" but then thought "wait..wouldn't that make them more spammable?" I know nothing of in-game stats and whatnot but; How about a 5% reduction in price for a 5% reduction in overall performance? I am not sure the light tank being spammed would be an effective strategy since they would probably be counter by enemy medium tank. (it was a viable strategy with Soviet industry once, but not any more). Imo it is worth testing. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What is the REAL problem with Ost T4?4 Mar 2020, 08:34 AM Jump back to quoted post4 Mar 2020, 06:24 AMSkysTheLimit I've wanted something like this for Ost for a long time. Would be great to be able to build more bunkers for just cover purposes. Moving the costs around is great way to do that I am not sure that would happen as long as "mainline infatry" can one shoot bunkers with satchels... In: COH2 Balance