Profile of SkysTheLimit

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: Ram + Offmap combo needs to be nerfed9 Jun 2020, 19:58 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Jun 2020, 19:54 PMBaba experience tought me that you rather use 1 x 200 ammo than throwing away 2 t 34s without getting the job done What on Earth are you talking about? 2 t34s? If you're gonna hit a tank with either of these airstrikes you'll need a t34 ram, unless your oponnent is braindead The comparison is 1 t34 and 1 rocket strike vs 1 t34 and 1 IL2 bomb.... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 5man grens OP?9 Jun 2020, 18:16 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Jun 2020, 17:33 PMT.R. Stormjäger Allies won in a landslide across the tournament and all we’re seeing is “nerf axis” threads. That tells you all you need to know about how meme levels of pointless these threads are. I see a Tiger overnerfed thread, and someone claiming rifles win frontally against mg42. Pretty sure stupidity isn't limited to the fanboys of one side or another 5 man grens are fine imo. They've been this way for a while and no one said anything I still don't think tournaments tell us that much about balance. It's good for knowing meta commanders, but it's on a limited number of maps in a limited number of matchups Jump back to quoted post8 Jun 2020, 18:01 PMIncendiaryRounds This is what I've been saying since the beginning of time.... Well seeing as you give us the meme threads for axis, I think everyone was ignoring you In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ram + Offmap combo needs to be nerfed9 Jun 2020, 18:10 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Jun 2020, 12:33 PMBaba it costs more, sure. but soviet lategame can afford it. especially since you only have to call it in once when done right Costs more is putting it mildly. Il2 bombs costs 200 munitions the rocket strafe is 100. You can literally call in 2 rocket strikes for every 1 IL2 bombing run In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF M20 dead?6 Jun 2020, 21:01 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Jun 2020, 21:58 PMVipper The unit is simply victim of the trend to make powerful unit earlier. I would actually benefit allot if the 221 was reintroduced and 222 was delayed. Yeah I agree with this. Also if you can get anything larger than a 222 to hit one of your mines chances are your m20 will more than pay for itself if you can secure that kill. Even killing a 222 with one is a big swing, especially if your m20 is still alive In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF M20 dead?5 Jun 2020, 20:04 PM The mines on its own make it worth the cost imo, but I will admit I can't find much use for it beyond that In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Adjusted commander portraits4 Jun 2020, 15:35 PM Wow these are so cool! Will these actually go into the game? In: Lobby
Thread: SU-76 - A Slight Adjustment2 Jun 2020, 05:07 AM Jump back to quoted post2 Jun 2020, 04:57 AMVipper What I would try would probably be the following: Increase XP value which is very low and allow the unit to vet very fast Remove tracking it can be used to selfspot for barrage Remove the vet bonus damage to barrage, there is no reason to be more lethal than zis Maybe increase acceleration to 2.8-3 to become a bit more responsive Maybe lower power level making it cheaper (60 fuel?) while lowering far penetration accuracy Increase armor so that it less prone to attack from 222 Replace accuracy buff with an HP I like the armor and accell changes. Also like the barrage discount per vet level idea The rotation rate change i liked more than the speed anyway, also to help with responsiveness In: COH2 Balance
Thread: SU-76 - A Slight Adjustment2 Jun 2020, 04:04 AM Jump back to quoted post2 Jun 2020, 02:43 AMVipper It can easily be changed and that is all I have said so far Yeah my mistake that was news to me. Didn't even realize they could do that Has any unit ever had that changed before? Just curious, I remember a couple of rotation changes for other units because of crushing (cromwell i believe?), but don't remember this feature being mentioned Do you think the buffs are okay if human crush is removed? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Stuka CAS2 Jun 2020, 03:55 AM Jump back to quoted post2 Jun 2020, 03:43 AMelchino7 At the end of the day, this would only be an UI thing, cause the behaviour of the Loiter would remain the same. Yeah that's exactly what I'm going for. My point is that the current UI is not inuitive at all for newer/less experienced players. Even with experience I have times where I'm positive I got it out of the radius in time, and the second pass from the planes still gets to me Yes it's new, but the game is already doing most of the work isn't it? The vehicle must have some kind of toggle that gets turned on to tell the plane to attack In: COH2 Balance
Thread: SU-76 - A Slight Adjustment2 Jun 2020, 02:27 AM Jump back to quoted post1 Jun 2020, 19:48 PMShadowLinkX37 One snare or not, crushing a squad with an AT vehicle imo is incredibly stupid and should be avoided. Imo the stupid thing would be trying to crush with it. Not only the one snare, but as an assault gun you're probably gonna be pointing your gun in the wrong direction should something show up Jump back to quoted post1 Jun 2020, 23:35 PMVipper Crush humans and light/medium/heavy crush are different properties If we can remove human crush with a simple toggle than just do it? Why let that dictate whether or not we can buff it's rotation? I totally agree with you it shouldn't have crush. I just think it's not a good idea to crush with it anyway and I like the rotation rate buff for every other part of the units performance In: COH2 Balance