Profile of donofsandiego

Avatar Area

Offline United States
Posts: 1404

General Information
Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJT-oswDRyOrhrVghT-6ZRw
Steam: 76561198157193379
Nationality:

United States
Game Name: Snaek

Signature

"And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family?..The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and... the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If...if...We didn't love freedom enough...We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward.”

― Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn , The Gulag Archipelago 1918–1956

Show Latest Posts


Thread: AFK9 Feb 2022, 14:22 PM Jump back to quoted post31 Jan 2022, 14:31 PMProtos Angelus the guy comes back and says "Sorry. I got vaccinated. The nurses came to my house" China gaming In: Lobby
Thread: how your sleep impacts CoH performance28 Jan 2022, 14:36 PM Based COH2 player looks out for his fellow players and tells them to get a good night's sleep. In: Lobby
Thread: USF lategame anti infantry team27 Jan 2022, 12:43 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Jan 2022, 05:03 AMGrumpy No argument there, but wasn't cover to cover nerfed because of that? I don't know but it would make sense. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: USF lategame anti infantry team20 Jan 2022, 18:18 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Jan 2022, 23:49 PMGrumpy Trying to use rangers as your AT in late game is just throwing a match. One ranger to keep them from diving AT guns or Jacksons is usually enough. Most teammates will get annoyed if they see you chasing tanks with Rangers. Having 1-2 rifles along with your ranger is good for snaring. If you lose all of your rifles, replace them with the officers first. They're always better than vanilla rifles. After that, RE's to cap and build green cover. Vet 0 rifles generally suck late game, and almost as bad of an idea as rangers for your AT. When Urban Defense first came out, though, using zooked-up rangers with cover to cover was absolutely a blast. Most players didn't seem to realize the danger that they were in haha. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: OST sniper need nerf.20 Jan 2022, 04:36 AM Man the interest for this game must be really dying down when people are still responding to threads made three months ago. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Increased RA from nearly squads - Antiblob measure.18 Jan 2022, 07:33 AM Jump back to quoted post17 Jan 2022, 10:12 AMEsxile Always thought Focus Fire off was simply spreading the damage to the entire squad instead of picking one model per one. It let into having squad losing health but no model until each hit 0. I think you're right and I was mistaken. I think that it should roll to hit nearby squads though. It would be a good way to nerf blobs imo. It would probably be too resource intensive to be reasonable to add though. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Making M-42's canister shot more player friendly14 Jan 2022, 17:34 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Jan 2022, 17:19 PMVipper There is difference imo... I'm just not seeing what that difference is. Jump back to quoted post14 Jan 2022, 17:19 PMVipper ...I would had no issue with Sherman HE coming with ignore vehicles option... Neither would I, but if you want it to be consistent it should also be applied to the ISU in addition to those two. In: Lobby
Thread: Making M-42's canister shot more player friendly14 Jan 2022, 16:43 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Jan 2022, 16:04 PMVipper It is quite simple. Canister shot will not fire on it intended target unless one change to free fire. The Sherman HE will fire on intended target unless one set the weapon to fire on vehicles. Doesn't make sense. Your argument is effectively: "well the Sherman comes with vehicle prioritization already turned off so it's fine" as if the USF player can't just turn on vehicle prioritization after the fact. Clearly, if we extrapolate your argument here, the solution is to have M-42 enter the field with vehicle prioritization turned off. That way, M-42 AI shot will "fire on intended target unless one set the weapon to fire on vehicles". If that doesn't make sense to you, that's because it doesn't make sense. The fact is there is no huge difference between the two. If you're advocating for this change to the M-42, you might as well advocate for it to be done to the Sherman as well. In: Lobby
Thread: Increased RA from nearly squads - Antiblob measure.14 Jan 2022, 15:31 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Jan 2022, 14:55 PMProtos Angelus Those strategies fall flat in higher skilled games where enemy knows how to implement werfer/stuka into builds. I'm not talking about higher skilled games. I'm talking about the fact that it works at any skill level at all. It shouldn't. It should be the easiest thing in the world to counter with a single MG. But it isn't, and that's stupid. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Increased RA from nearly squads - Antiblob measure.14 Jan 2022, 14:44 PM I personally think that a simpler implementation of an "anti-blob" mechanic is to simply make the "near-miss hit" mechanic work for all weapons. I don't recall the exact name of it, but some weapons like the MG can still roll for a hit against nearby squads after missing the squad its firing at. This should be the case for every weapon in the game. Think about it: you're firing your garand at one squad with three others behind it. You miss one entity. How likely is it that you hit one of the twelve men standing behind that one? Very likely indeed. That's my opinion, anyways. In: COH2 Gameplay