Wait, you think its THOSE people who are naive? Not the people who expected COH 2 level balance and content, right out the gate? Hahaha.
Nice strawman. It's a cope to convince yourself that everyone who takes issue with CoH 3 expected it to have all the same amount of commanders and balance as CoH 2. It's more reasonable to believe they expected it to have a replay system, no placeholder assets, player nameplates, and in my case, more than two maps for a gamemode, and so on.
It's not a good way to do business to recuse a company from wrongdoing because "oh, they did it in the past". Like if a state were to reimplement a policy of removing an ethnic group from this mortal coil, but they do less than last time; "Oh it's fine because last time it was way worse". Well how about it doesn't happen in the first place? That's preferable I think. But maybe I'm old school.
United States
Just remember the people who write those are probably the same who spend their time in the STEAM FORUMS.

