Login

russian armor

KV1 and Churchill can take too much damage

PAGES (19)down
2 Jun 2019, 20:47 PM
#101
avatar of Mr. Someguy

Posts: 4928

jump backJump back to quoted post2 Jun 2019, 11:55 AMNaOCl


Elephant/Jagdtiger


Doctrinal solution to a non-doctrinal problem.
2 Jun 2019, 21:09 PM
#102
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17884 | Subs: 8



Doctrinal solution to a doctrinal problem.

Doctrines exist specifically for that.
If you can't handle(as in lack of skill, because tools are there for all factions now) something, pick a doctrine that'll make it easy for you.
3 Jun 2019, 08:56 AM
#103
avatar of Grim

Posts: 1093

jump backJump back to quoted post2 Jun 2019, 15:27 PMVipper
The problem is not simply the performance of Churchill but the performance of allied armor/TD and infatry.



Armour, TD's and AND infantry are the problem now?

That's a very generalist statement XD
3 Jun 2019, 09:04 AM
#104
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17884 | Subs: 8

jump backJump back to quoted post3 Jun 2019, 08:56 AMGrim


Armour, TD's and AND infantry are the problem now?

That's a very generalist statement XD

You're living under a rock?
Allies op, if you think otherwise, you're a fanboy.

Also, I find it hilariously funny that in all this theorycraft scenarios allies always have maxed pop cap of well balanced army, while axis always seem to have just 2 units, that happen to be the same units, with no support and at least 1 is never microed.

It comes out almost as axis player do not know how to counter specific combinations with the tools they have and instead of having diverse armies themselves, they always resort to spam and if they have more then 1 unit type, these units are never less then 3 sectors apart from each other, so supporting themselves is never an option.
3 Jun 2019, 09:51 AM
#105
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13476 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post3 Jun 2019, 08:56 AMGrim


Armour, TD's and AND infantry are the problem now?

That's a very generalist statement XD

None of above performance on its own is a problem. Their combination is.
3 Jun 2019, 10:58 AM
#106
avatar of SeductiveCardbordBox

Posts: 591 | Subs: 1

A combined army of well used units is a problem?

Shit son. Better nerf that. Remive everything but grens and conscripts, game fixed.
3 Jun 2019, 11:22 AM
#107
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13476 | Subs: 1

A combined army of well used units is a problem?

Shit son. Better nerf that. Remive everything but grens and conscripts, game fixed.
It is when a combined army of well sued Ostheer units can not deal with less combined army of allied unit using less micro.
3 Jun 2019, 11:49 AM
#108
avatar of SeductiveCardbordBox

Posts: 591 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post3 Jun 2019, 11:22 AMVipper
It is when a combined army of well sued Ostheer units can not deal with less combined army of allied unit using less micro.


That's an L2P issue, situated between keyboard and chair.

Be it build choices or micro or use of units, there's no Magic Brit Bullet for easy wins by picking Anvil.
3 Jun 2019, 12:11 PM
#109
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13476 | Subs: 1



That's an L2P issue, situated between keyboard and chair.

Be it build choices or micro or use of units, there's no Magic Brit Bullet for easy wins by picking Anvil.

Your entitled to your opinion.

But this clearly not a player issue. Churchill is simply op currently.
3 Jun 2019, 12:27 PM
#110
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17884 | Subs: 8

jump backJump back to quoted post3 Jun 2019, 12:11 PMVipper

But this clearly not a player issue. Churchill is simply op currently.

That's also an opinion, unless you're hiding some relic metrics on use and efficiency of a unit and if you do, share it for only that way it'll stop being opinion.

Until then, its just another opinion you're fully entitled to.
3 Jun 2019, 12:49 PM
#111
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13476 | Subs: 1


That's also an opinion, unless you're hiding some relic metrics on use and efficiency of a unit and if you do, share it for only that way it'll stop being opinion.

Until then, its just another opinion you're fully entitled to.

It is refreshing to see that you have finally started respecting others people opinion instead of calling them "noobs" and "wehraboos", you have a long way ahead of you but it is start. Keep it up.

Have a nice day.
3 Jun 2019, 13:30 PM
#112
avatar of WingZero

Posts: 1484

If you play Wher - Stug spam works wonders vs Churchills and its cost efficient.
3 Jun 2019, 13:46 PM
#113
avatar of Stug life

Posts: 4474


That's also an opinion, unless you're hiding some relic metrics on use and efficiency of a unit and if you do, share it for only that way it'll stop being opinion.

Until then, its just another opinion you're fully entitled to.
katitof what's ur opinion on the chirchuil ? do fell it's fair for it to have such an high rear armor ? with so much hp ?
3 Jun 2019, 13:55 PM
#114
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17884 | Subs: 8

katitof what's ur opinion on the chirchuil ? do fell it's fair for it to have such an high rear armor ? with so much hp ?

Yes, because its very slow vehicle that arrives very late, has very weak gun for the price and timing, slows to extreme crawl when fausted/drives over a mine, can't chase any other vehicle in game and blocks apparently overpowered comet and super extremely useful and strong vehicle snare(according to certain indivudual here) while, with the repair nerf to heavy sappers in the past, stays a long time in repairs.

Its 240 frontal armor isn't something hard to penetrate, a pair of stugs and an ATG will wreck it fast.
Just don't use 2 next to each other, completely unsupported by any other unit paks, because it can kill them.

Its a late game damage sponge tank.
It means it needs to soak in damage.
If it was supposed to be frail from any side, it would be by now.

You're not supposed to kill everything by parking P4 at its back.
3 Jun 2019, 14:04 PM
#115
avatar of Stug life

Posts: 4474


Yes, because its very slow vehicle that arrives very late, has very weak gun for the price and timing, slows to extreme crawl when fausted/drives over a mine, can't chase any other vehicle in game and blocks apparently overpowered comet and super extremely useful and strong vehicle snare(according to certain indivudual here) while, with the repair nerf to heavy sappers in the past, stays a long time in repairs.

Its 240 frontal armor isn't something hard to penetrate, a pair of stugs and an ATG will wreck it fast.
Just don't use 2 next to each other, completely unsupported by any other unit paks, because it can kill them.

Its a late game damage sponge tank.
It means it needs to soak in damage.
If it was supposed to be frail from any side, it would be by now.

You're not supposed to kill everything by parking P4 at its back.
that's fair but it has more armor than super heavy in the rear while having comparable frontal armor, and everytinh should have a counter, i think rear armor for vehicle should be the universal counter , i mean the whole point of COH2 is using the enemy weakness aganist them and catching them out of position(that's why we have arc ofr mg and team weapons and units needs to turn unlike say starcraft or age of empire)
3 Jun 2019, 14:47 PM
#116
avatar of elchino7
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

snip.


Some misconceptions.

1- USF roflstomped OH, so they gave OH an MG42 at T0 and mp to handle them. Nerf of RET lead to basically just rifle spam strats with 0 possibility of any variation early on because tech is too slow. Mortar was design to offer an alternative.

2- Penals were the original only squad which had a flamethrower which never exploded. Flamethrower crit was removed couple of years after launch for all other units. Penals either saw little/niche use when they were a 360mp squad with G43 like DPS on their SVTs and basically no use when they were made into 270mp units. Penals were made the defacto unit for Soviets, when you basically removed Maxims from the game and Conscripts were stripped of their cheese abilities and their muni cost increased, in favour of stats boost which never manage to cut it to viable state.

3- Anything that screams cheese has been nerfed or changed to be harder to pull off. They no longer are IWIN buttons on their own.

4- Volks shrecks were not nerfed, just plained removed when the faction received a complete rework like no other faction received. Double sturm has always been a niche opening, either post or pre rework. Obers saw plenty of use when they were completely broken and after that it has always been an issue of having them arrive way too late into the game.

katitof what's ur opinion on the chirchuil ? do fell it's fair for it to have such an high rear armor ? with so much hp ?


I think the current HP/armor values are there to keep it from either been an RNG machine with higher armor, while still been a soak sponge which needs to keep been repaired constantly (weakness)

Through the years the consensus on the unit has always been: xp fodder and useless unit which can't do shit cause it's slow and the cannon does nothing or they somehow achieved critical mass of units which lets them roll over slowly while not been able to kill them down.

You could reduce the armor (rear, maybe front) for a nerf and exchange HP with damage reduction for equal HP pool as a buff.
3 Jun 2019, 14:53 PM
#117
avatar of Lago

Posts: 3260

that's fair but it has more armor than super heavy in the rear while having comparable frontal armor, and everytinh should have a counter, i think rear armor for vehicle should be the universal counter , i mean the whole point of COH2 is using the enemy weakness aganist them and catching them out of position


That's the thing: it doesn't have comparable front armour to the super heavy tanks. Its front armour is barely better than an OKW Panzer IV, which has 234.

All the Churchill's abilities are geared towards close combat: short range grenades, SMGs on the side, smoke emitters originally designed to make a pathway for infantry. Therefore it sacrifices high frontal armour in favour of high rear armour.



What makes it so tough is the metric shit-ton of hit points it has.
3 Jun 2019, 14:58 PM
#118
avatar of T.R. Stormjäger

Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3

There is a very simple fix to damage sponge vehicles like the KV1 and Churchill which quite elegantly gives them a clear role and clear counters.

First of all, they should only be able to use HE shells, so that they are only useful vs infantry and support weapons. They should not be able to fight tanks. Tanks should be a hard counter to them. Jagtigers/Elephants are not a counter, they are in super niche doctrines, unless you want to put the churchill in a doctrine in which case the convo changes.

This solution should be accompanied by a buff to Axis td penetration, just like allied TDs started penetrating axis armour like crazy, ie the Tiger. This way Tank destroyers hard counter heavy tanks, while these tanks are useful to hard counter support weapons and infantry.
3 Jun 2019, 15:05 PM
#119
avatar of distrofio

Posts: 2358



That's an L2P issue, situated between keyboard and chair.

Be it build choices or micro or use of units, there's no Magic Brit Bullet for easy wins by picking Anvil.

Rude

Since when are you allowed to bully others katitof like? For serious, you started using irony to debate a possible balance issue and after vipper explained his point, you just level it up to a L2P.

Maybe he is on. Point and you just can't deny that
3 Jun 2019, 15:17 PM
#120
avatar of distrofio

Posts: 2358

Imho, chirchuils tanks are great, I just can't say they are OP, but as other sponge tanks, they always get a 'extra' function rather than the one they are meant. It's the critical mass role. In other words if you are dumb enough to let your opponent get two churchill's, it's almost game over. They both need a royal amount of countering to stop them. Team games can exploit that. Most tanks hardly can achieve that. That's why their gun can't be that good

Other than that the tank is fine.
PAGES (19)down
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

435 users are online: 435 guests
7 posts in the last 24h
42 posts in the last week
149 posts in the last month
Registered members: 44934
Welcome our newest member, Jarec279
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM