Profile of Mr Carmine

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 901

General Information


Thread: So is 5 man grens completely useless nowYesterday, 18:59 PM Jump back to quoted postYesterday, 17:08 PMHannibal Fair point, I forgot to add the 30 MP for the fifth model of Grens. Yes, then I agrree that those squads are roughly equal in costs. In general I think though that doctrinal abilities should not be stronger by default than stock choices. It is good enough if they offer a viable option. Lumping the 5th model in with grens cost while leaving out the mp and fuel cost to unlock nades and upgrades for rifles doesnt show a complete and honest picture. Vsl grens shoudnt be on par with fully kitted rifles or sections, ost regardless still has acces to their entire stock arsanal witch dont struggle vs allied inf mostly, its just grens that do with 4 men and vsl remedies that. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Smartie's commander reworks: Soviets24 Jan 2021, 07:52 AM Jump back to quoted post23 Jan 2021, 20:11 PMVipper T-34/85 is simply more cost efficient than PzIV J. That both t34's are more cost effevtive is in line with the faction. Same with okw and redicolous armour out of the gate. Has any one ever used ram on the the t34 85? Its quite a bit unfitting and nearly usseles ability for such a unit. Just a lazy copy paste. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Smartie's commander reworks: Soviets23 Jan 2021, 19:13 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Jan 2021, 18:18 PMSmartie It's good that we talk about such inconsistency in this thread. That's exactly the kind of minor change that the commander patch have to tackle. Fuel cost needs to be increased or the HP needs to be lowered. That being said the T-34/85 is a hell of unit and should be in more 2bd or 3rd tier doctrines. The t34 85 is fine as is. Its doctrinal and can take an extra shot but gets penned by all forms of at with its 160 armour vs 234 on the p4j. Unlike the p4j wich bounces with some consistancy all but the heaviest at sources. Giving it about the same maybe a bit more suvivabilty then a t34-85. And as whe are speaking of inconsistancy why does the p4j start with such high armour out of the gate? If the t34 85 isent allowed more health then normal meds then shurly the p4j or even panthers comets and japgzr 4 shoudnt have such high armour as well. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pls change StG44 gun19 Jan 2021, 18:01 PM Just be happy vsl covers the grens greatest weakness, their durability. They could just give the vsl a luger. And how people get that bal team hates ost is just strange. It isent like pgrens ostruppen grens ostwind panther brumbar recieved any buffs over the last few patches now did they In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] SOV Feedback18 Jan 2021, 22:01 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Jan 2021, 19:18 PMelchino7 The unit will still remain prevalent and strong cause the nerfs are small and tech adjustment was small as well. Value of unit is more than fine, the problem is that it just drags the other 2 units in the tier for it. Yes its prevelant ofcourse how else do you put on the pressure as soviets. The t70 isent just any unit, it is the mid game. Together the small nerfs have a noticable impact. Dont get me wrong toning it down in dps was the right choice. But together its to much without cost reduction. Esp since lots more nerfs have been done besides the t70. Somewhere a cost reduction seems in order how ever small. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] SOV Feedback18 Jan 2021, 06:57 AM Jump back to quoted post18 Jan 2021, 06:35 AMMMX This pretty much. The ROF decrease results in a net DPS loss of barely 15%, and the new AoE model count restriction won't apply in the majority of combat situations, either. Together with the slightly earlier arrival I'd argue the combat value of the T-70 has hardly been reduced by the Balance Preview changes. Yes it might dish out a bit less damage against extremely bunched-up or garrisoned targets, but nerfs to mobility or survivability would have hit the unit way harder than a mere readjustment of its already great DPS. I would still like to see a price reduction of the same level as the nerfs. While not bad its timing is a bit to late imo. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] OST Feedback17 Jan 2021, 10:11 AM Jump back to quoted post17 Jan 2021, 09:24 AMmrgame2 im talking about brumbar armor nerf which revert to 100% even after the 60td nerf. again, we need to see what compensation of nerfing brumbar, vsl and ostt, critical units. lets also not talk about panther, 'dive and high durable and AI'. it is a dead horse, and not many think highly of that outside of 4v4 late games. panther works in 2v2 but not OP or even close. Entire late game nerf for soviets is already quite some compensation for vsl brum and ostr nerfs. You where comolaining about 60 range high pen td's. I countered with axis have very high armour stock, inlike usf and sov esp. Hence why allied td's need to do their job well. I also did not say or state panther is op. Just that it operates differently. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] OST Feedback17 Jan 2021, 09:19 AM Jump back to quoted post17 Jan 2021, 08:57 AMmrgame2 these belong in sov thread. i just say the 10% 60td is needed nerf. now the nerf to brumbar armor makes it still 100% pen from 60 range at vet 60td, back to square 1. does panther 100% pen at max range against allies heavy AI? now that needs a look aint it? if vsl and ostt are too 'cheap' then increase the price, and not nerf their performance. all 3 units are hit without compensation, suggesting Wehrboo is the strongest faction in live game! is that right? 60 range 100% pen on allied td's is because they all lack in armour 160 stock vs 240/290 and even higher in docs and kt on okw out of the gate, no ai whatsoever, no stock heavy tanks for usf and soviet. Panthers can fight all armour are fast to dive and more durable to survive a dive, they have ai and a turret wich can clear out atguns together with their high durability and speed, and heavy crush etc they are not even close to allied td's. The brum nerf was so td's stand a chance instead of none. Entire soviet late game got nerfed, seems to suggest soviets where to strong don't it. And i never said soviet up axis op on this patch. And watching 2nd game of tootsy vs luvnest seems t70 with early buffs to t1 and penal ptrs do fine. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] OST Feedback17 Jan 2021, 08:52 AM Jump back to quoted post17 Jan 2021, 08:46 AMmrgame2 as i said, i only agree t70 was hit too bad. the rest you mention, is not in the same quadrant as the brumbar, or even vsl and ostt. 10 less armour vs less pen on allied td,s is basicly a tie. Vsl was to potent for the price it needed toning down, same as ostruppen into pgrens. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] OST Feedback17 Jan 2021, 08:42 AM Jump back to quoted post17 Jan 2021, 08:05 AMmrgame2 i argue because brumbar, vsl, ostt all got nerf bat. these units are holding wehrboo infantry and late games together, in 2v2 rank >1000. if allies got similar nerfs, then i agree. the proof in the video. bam. Lol you missed the zis, t70, quad, t34, su85, conscript nerfs. Thats just soviets. Get your facts straight. Stop the axis always everywhere every time up doctrine jeeezz In: COH2 Balance