Profile of Mr Carmine

Jump back to quoted postToday, 07:17 AMgbem

although the pgren nukenade is simply amazing at wiping stuff... the riflenade is damn unreliable for both the shooter and the reciever

Jump back to quoted postYesterday, 23:27 PMGrim

I think making the Maxim halfway decent would fix a lot. At the moment T2 still isn't worth risking for USSR.

Jump back to quoted post11 Sep 2019, 22:45 PMAlphrum

wtf are u talking about, everyone has to tech for high armoured units, and bazookas tend to be VERY good vs anything below the panther, which is majority of axis vehicles. The only faction that has a right to cry is USF because of ther low armour but UKF has high armoured tanks where bazookas wont do sht, and in fact you can use doctrines as a reason for soviets because most of ther doctrines gives them access to very good tanks, soviets doctrines are unique in that regard then to every other faction. (when soviets where originally designed the faction play style was designed to be relied on what doctrine u chose which is why they have some of the best and most useful doctrines).

are you claiming allies don't have good mobile AT inf too? what makes them just as dangerous is the ability to snare. Look, in order to get double shreks for example, they come on an expensive squad 4 man squad or for OKW in 2 doc's, while for e.g. uSF can equip riflemen squad with X2 bazookas WITH snare or put it on a dirt cheap rear echleon squad, no doc;s required. UKF can do them same on engineers with snare. ALL factions can have powerful inf AT, however, which is better is situational but one thing clearly going for allies is the accessibility.

Jump back to quoted post11 Sep 2019, 07:16 AMullumulu

here is the deal:

make schrecks a exact bazooker or piats copy.

and let equip them dual by volks, stpios, grens, pios etc

OK?