That's because 76mm sherman is soviet sherman and not USF one, i'd be surprised if ANY USF skins work with it. |
is that solution ? 
i like RNG but i hate injustice RNG you know that
Yes, that is solution.
If you do not like core mechanics of a game, you change game to one with core mechanics that you do like, you don't try to brute force your way and change the game to your liking, because there is plenty of people who do like the game how it is and as mentioned before, games with mechanics you do like exist. |
If you don't like RNG, there are plenty of "red alert" WW2 RTS games out there to play.
RNG isn't going anywhere. |
You firmly believe IS-2 is strong while KT is weak.
That alone screams how bad and detached you are from reality.
IS-2 is in worse state then KT for almost a year, whatever you can do to KT, you can do the same to IS-2.
You're also grasping at straws HARD here, because IS-2 is the ONLY ALLIED VEHICLE IN GAME that is actually armored - and its not even meta for around a year.
You're not going to prove your point by using extremes either.
Again, allied and axis TDs do NOT have the same role nor they are supposed to engage the same targets.
You want to go against IS-2, use panther, if you're not using panther against IS-2, you're terrible and don't understand your very own faction you're fanboying so hard.
Again, read it slowly and multiple times, take as long as it takes to let it sink:
JP4 and StuG are there to counter MEDIUM armor and they do that very well.
Panther is there to counter HEAVY armor and it does it very well.
Allied TDs are supposed to fight BOTH medium AND heavy armor, because allies do NOT have stock super tanks in their end tiers, but they will eventually face them regardless of opponents doctrines. |
The joke is:
alli TD have easier work against KT than ost and OKW have vs heavy armor like IS2.
jgpz4 bounces a lot..even from side. rakten dies by any hit.
stugs are low range and less life/ armor than the jgpz4.
only pak40, elefant or jgtiger can push back effectivly heavy armor.
You're not supposed to use stugs or JP4 against IS-2.
They are NOT supposed to engage heavy armor.
That's specifically why panther exists.
Allies have 1 TD to do it all, axis can choose with what they can engage.
Using arguments based on incorrect unit use to counter threats will do exactly zero for your point. |
This statement again confirms that you ARE a scrub as I correctly predicted. I said AT guns are good vs 222 spam. Ofc every vehicles can attempt to circle strafe an at gun, only because you allow it to due to not supporting it with a snare unit.
I suppose you've never experienced what a 222 spam does to brits.
No, AEC is not helpful, because just 2 222s will walk over it.
You don't have a snare and you can't afford more then 1 ATG. |
Thread: SU-7611 Jul 2018, 20:34 PM
The Soviet don't lack for munitions seeing as they don't have a sink. Weapon upgrades? Nope. Pintle mgs? Nope. Fancy pants weapon racks? Nerp. Bunkers to lick down areas without population cost? Nohohope. Cheap mines and situation abilities are all they have to spend muni on unless you pick a doctrine with a sink.
Molotovs are more expensive, oorah is more expensive, penals have upgrade, you have to go for guards and/or ppsh doctrine as stock cons, while better, aren't going to carry you in late game.
Soviets do not have stock weapon upgrades other then penal ptrs, but nowadays there is plenty of muni sinks, given how every single ability cost muni now and there is plenty to use.
These costs stack up quickly if you keep utilizing them. |
Forward Observation could actually be fixed by introducing back recon section, limit it to 1, give according cost and make them use the abilities with that range limit.
It would not be map dependent, we'd get unused brit unit back and we could scrap a crappy concept that never worked to begin with. |
I guess if someone is the self-proclaimed "number one allied fanboy" then he would feel the need to justify his title by describing broken things like "lend lease", win-industry, cancer commander, USF mortar on release, Penal on redesign...as a "breath of fresh air"
M4A3 has broken reload that can go down to around 1.7 sec.
And I guess if someone stalks another so hard, he would do his homework on stalked persons background.
I'm proclaiming myself as all factions player, the other label got stuck to me by the likes of ulumulu or incendiary_rounds of old(which is ironical in itself).
Can you already proclaim yourself as "number one axis fanboy" already though?
You've lost subtle neutrality months ago and turned full on allied hater, only difference is, you try to excuse yourself with numbers(due to both of us knowing full well that your in game abilities not being on pair even with me). |
I'm not saying it was balanced, none of the new commanders was.
I'm saying it was fresh, giving soviets a vehicle flavor that they previously never had, high dps med tank with pintle mg. |