Profile of vasa1719

Finally somthing good here.

Not trying to sound condescending (though thats probably exactly what I'm doing) but there are a lot of extremely good players who have already offered their opinions on most of these subjects. A lot of the changes that many people have ridiculed (whether theyre blatantly biased players, rank 2000+ 4v4 players, decent players, forum members that dont even play the game anymore, etc.) were made under the advisement of or were suggested by the literal best players that this community has; this includes players from all game sizes (1v1, 2v2, and 3v3+4v4). With these kinds of balance threads generating a lot of...noise, and with almost every other person having directly opposite impressions and opinions of the changes, its kind of natural to place the most importance on feedback from top players who, quite frankly, have shown that they actually understand the game. Given how large the skill/knowledge gap is between the tournament winners and, well, everyone else, they kind of earned the credibility that was given to them. And yes, that unfortunately means that a lot of people's opinions will go under the radar.

You look like person who know somthing. So tell to us, what ranks of players can criticize, how many hours thay must have to do it ? And what another must to do, just look that some kind of abusers (suggested by the literal best players that this community has) you must write there names, if you use them like proofs to defend but not explaine patch changes. I think community must know heroes, specially part that are 2k ranks players and dont play game.
You guys use same logic taht close to Hainlaine books, where if you dont was in army, you dont have civil rights. For our community its more looks like part of nazi or rasism. Not top ???? 5 ? 10 ? 20 ? 50 ? You opinion are nothing untermench ? So tell to us Jae, how many top players watch you in tounreys ? 5 or 10 ? or maybe it was hundreds of regular players ?
Thanks, nice to know that in balance team are part of elite nazi players, that win 0 in Esport coh, but exhibit themselves like navel of Earth.
Wow, you say tourneys winners, so its must be DevM, Noggano, VonIvan, Jove, Barton, Luvnest, Paula ? How many time thay spend for it, coz thay study, work ? Or thay just make signature (good/bad changes) ?
Back again with few words, so this top players and tounrey winners are so good, so thay cannot push retreut buttno from katysha shoot, but dont have same problem with stuka and PW ? Did thay are best after this ?
Also constructors of planes are not best pilots, but best pilots are not constructors.

Problems with doors ?

G43s are out of scope aparently too, g43s changes were mentioned too.

What ways was to change ppsh ? Buff it and make 2 ? Up price ? Somthing another ? Did ppsh DPS in close are same like bars or STG ? What role of cons with ppsh are now ?

Huh? I never said that Kat is more lethal, I'm just suggesting that they seem to be designed to do different things (also, not saying that that is good or bad).

Stuka and PW clearly have a better alpha strike that is certainly more lethal to single team weapons; however, IF you survived that alpha strike (and yes, that happens), there is no reason to move your shit anymore (or any adjacent units), because that was the end of the barrage.

Seems like PW's and Stuka's intended role is to kill stuff more or less surgically and reliably. They have to have a serious alpha strike, because, well, there isn't a "beta strike". All allied rocket artillery seems to be more for area denial: As opponent, you have a good chance to survive the first rockets, but you really should move all your stuff in the vicinity away to increase chances of it not dying. And according to the notes they feel that Katy - despite probably being intended mostly for area denial - is too good in the role of the PW/Stuka.

Again, I'm not saying that Katy is too good now or too bad, or that the intended role is useful or not or that the whole concept has merits or not. Only pointing out that the argument "but PW and Stuka have a huge alpha strike" falls short.

Now, feel free to discuss if the Katy's alpha strike is indeed too strong or not, or if PW/Stuka barrages should work more like Katy/LM/Calli or vice versa, or whatever...

I agree with Katitof, though, in that it would be helpful to get like "Designer's notes" on what roles the units are supposed to fill, because at that point one can discuss to what extend the units actually fulfill the intended role and if that role is useful in the first place.

(they feel that Katy - despite probably being intended mostly for area denial - is too good in the role of the PW/Stuka.)

How thay feel it, did thay have numbers of killing or survive models ? Its all are personal feeling of the game, maybe from 4v4, maybe from 1v1. What if another have different opinion ? To make changes like this, i need more arguments than feelings in game that based on numbers.If here was statistic (like in cards game), that show what time you need to react, its will be somthing like argument.
Hope lords descend to us to write about "Designer's notes".