Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: Replace Tiger Ace with King Tiger for elite troops?28 Dec 2018, 14:59 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Dec 2018, 13:43 PMScoped I really like the idea especially to bring more value towards the elite troops doctoring. However, what about just removing the penalty resource on call in and lower CP and keep the tiger ace ? Then there is zero reason to keep it ace all together as you're just asking for regular tiger now. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: OKW's 221 is too weak for its 20 fuel cost28 Dec 2018, 12:44 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Dec 2018, 12:33 PMelchino7 Playing with the values of vet gain so people can use the Riegel mine. Vet is shared, so keeping it in the vincinity of combat will eventually get it to vet5 without ever exposing it, it does vet fastest out of all OKW units thanks to that shared vet. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW's 221 is too weak for its 20 fuel cost27 Dec 2018, 23:53 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Dec 2018, 22:25 PMStug life again it needs 50 fuel(20 cost 15 truck call in and starting with 15 fu less) gained before one can call it in if we are talking about timing for counters , all the counter come sooner ex:ukf can get to tier 1 at the same time as the tech truck comes than okw has to wait other 20 fu for it, u can get at gun or RE for counters and if u want even the aec with a delay How dense are you? 5 starting fuel. You need 15 for truck. Then you need 20 for 221. That's 30 fuel you need to get, 35 total - everything else is you arguing god knows what without making any sense. Its 100% irrelevant what other factions starting fuel is BECAUSE SOME OTHER FACTIONS HAVE TO BUILD A TIER AT START. Its 30 fuel to get, not 50, regardless of your insane arguments, unless you specifically talk about 223 and not 221. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW's 221 is too weak for its 20 fuel cost27 Dec 2018, 16:28 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Dec 2018, 16:13 PMWiderstreit You know the problem with you is? You arn't able to think over the things you arn't able to see, because you can't make an imagine in your brain. I read your post since years, allways the same. The irony of this part is literally killing me. Only because the teching was like that, it has not to stay so. But it is and it isn't being revamped another time. It had T1 problems, but it doesn't anymore. The strategy you're trying to use as example for your suggestions is dead for years. Maybe you should think over the things you aren't able to see to understand that? So, I am no fan of Penals, I am no fan that they get the PTRS. I am no fan that snipers are covert that effective by Penals. I am no fan that Cons are obsolet because of that situation. etc. Oh sure you're not, I can tell that. But you know what? Why aren't you complaining about brits doing the exact same thing with PIAT engies? Or Ost, doing the same thing with shreck PGs? Why do you think its only an issue with a faction that has the WEAKEST handheld AT to protect the sniper that can't even 360 no scope nuke your light? Soviets are broken, so lets fix that. And a buffed 221 will not be the solution. Soviets aren't broken, perhaps your utter refusal to use needed units when they are needed is broken? You are trying to fix a problem that doesn't exist by creating even greater problem that was a massive problem before and was just fixed recently. Is it because your brain can't make an image out of it? Jump back to quoted post27 Dec 2018, 16:23 PMthedarkarmadillo But it does exist and is here so we can't ignore the disbalance it sits in. And instead of arguing about it, I would much rather have one or more community modders come here and explain the reasoning for the choice as well as intended role, because it most certainly is confusing to some. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW's 221 is too weak for its 20 fuel cost27 Dec 2018, 16:03 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Dec 2018, 15:51 PMWiderstreit Because why? Because you have to build T1 if you sniper wants immunity? So, with that change also free AT-grenades for Cons would be a possibility. Thinking around the corns isn't your strength, isn't it? And another confirmation that you know nothing about soviets and never played a singular game with them. Newsflash: Its NOT ostheer, its NOT working as ostheer, its NOT teching as ostheer, its NOT supposed to tech as ostheer. You're talking soviets, but thinking ostheer. Its SUPPOSED to pick one early game tech that covers basic needs for AI and AT and vehicle support is supposed to cover the rest. That is the very reason penals were given PTRS and that isn't going to change. You're living example of that saying, you know "people who forget the past are deemed to repeat it". In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW's 221 is too weak for its 20 fuel cost27 Dec 2018, 15:46 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Dec 2018, 15:44 PMWiderstreit Because why? Because you have to build Cons and tech AT-grenades? Penals have to be pushed out of normal early-game. They are specialists, no line-infantry. I absolutely adore how ignorant you can be, given how you completely ignore why T1 was given AT due to being incapable of defending against any kind of armor and you, in your ignorance, want to do exactly the same thing with T2. See people, this is how you spot people who know the faction exclusively from opposing side, being blisfully unaware how it functions. Do you want to see guards in every single game? Because that's how you get guards in every single game. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW's 221 is too weak for its 20 fuel cost27 Dec 2018, 15:18 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Dec 2018, 15:14 PMWiderstreit All early german vehicles arrive after all allii-player get access to AT-weapons now. And that is good. BUT it isn't good that one fraction get access to counter everything with only two unit-types and without any expenditure. There are many ways too fix this porblem, but in my option no way it too buff the 221 for that. Edit: I am a fan of pushing Cons, nerf Penasl, make T2 more useful. Actually, one arrives before and is weak enough to be fended of by rifles only. Do you want to tell me which one and repeat why? Going back to my original point, 221 has no place, remove it and just put 223 once truck is deployed. 221 will never be self sufficient or cost effective, because its not supposed to be, it is NOT a vehicle with potential upgrade, its a half of vehicle with other half gated. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW's 221 is too weak for its 20 fuel cost27 Dec 2018, 15:07 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Dec 2018, 14:46 PMWiderstreit Simply accept the facts. Whats the sense of making one commander able to counter the standard-tactic of one fraction? Building around doesn't fix the problem. Maybe you should accept the facts instead? 221 is obers of vehicles. Just as obers do not work without LMG34 and are "not cost effective", 221 doesn't work well without its upgrade, because its not meant to. That's one fact. Do you want to know how I know that? Because its priced 20fu and 10 for upgrade instead of 10fu with 20 upgrade. Here's another: Aggressive early game vehicle on axis side would steamroll all 3 allied factions, because they have NO ACCESS to neither snares nor AT at the time of its arrival. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW's 221 is too weak for its 20 fuel cost27 Dec 2018, 14:43 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Dec 2018, 14:32 PMWiderstreit Let be fair... the only problem Ostheer and Westheer have is the early ptrs with sniper combo destroing the hole ligh-vehicle play. So 221 has the same problem. Side-effect, Soviet T2 is often not needed, better building T3. 221 if fine versus US and Brits, Penal+Snipers are the problem. To fix this problems (bringing the line-up in order) we should change soviet Tiers after all the changes Soviets got the last years. T1: - M3 - Penal - Zis (Maybe making the M3 unlooked in T0 after T1 or T2 got build, assault engineers moves into T1 instead. Cons in T0 becomes the base-building-unit instead etc.) T2: - Maxim - Mortar - Sniper But, this needs an own debat. It is only an idea. Edit: Making the 221 better brings more problems than solutions. 2016 called, they want your posts complaining about meta from that time back. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW's 221 is too weak for its 20 fuel cost27 Dec 2018, 12:15 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Dec 2018, 11:52 AMVipper Why shouldn't be? What role would want it have? OKW having a doctrinal counter to m3/UC/WC51 and to snipers makes perfect sense. But it doesn't make sense to have early game doctrinal unit that has no counter when it arrives, while it counters literally all units on field at the time. See the problem yet? High cost and low armor keep 221 in check. Yet again(as you seem to completely ignore it every single time), no allied faction has counter for any decently armored light with turret in very early game 221 arrives. You want stronger or cheaper aka more spammable 221? Sure, have it, but you have to make sure allies actually have a counter for it. Allow rifles to start with AT nades, make something so brits can use AT at T0 without fuel investment(you know, like puppchen and ost fausts) and lower cost of soviet AT nades from 25 to 10 and we may start talking about buffing or making 221 cheaper. 221 itself may not be most cost effective thing, but as already said, much like oversoldaten, its not suposed to, because its balanced around being upgraded. If that wasn't enough, you seem to firmly believe once its 223, it should be planted on resource point and forgoten, like a cache. It shouldn't, it should then be used more aggressively, because now it can survive more and do more and shared vet allows it to vet up fast. You want to make a dough and you complain that flour alone doesn't cut it. Well, flour alone isn't supposed to work, you're supposed to add water(upgrade) and then it'll work. In: COH2 Balance