Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: moving the soviet sniper flare to vet 022 Dec 2018, 18:39 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Dec 2018, 13:15 PMmortiferum You snipe a gren model, and the squad is only 75% effective. LMG42 exists and makes this as incorrect as it gets. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why are 1v1 games only axis vs allies?22 Dec 2018, 12:23 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Dec 2018, 12:12 PMd0ggY There was a wehrmacht Battalion fighting alongside the americans in Austria before the war ended Kappa There were also russians shooting at russians. Maybe a funfact worthy, but hardly history changing count. In: Lobby
Thread: Why are 1v1 games only axis vs allies?22 Dec 2018, 12:10 PM Ever heard of immersion? CoH is WW2 based series. It might be new to you, but in WW2 americans were not fighting agaisnt british or soviets and wehrmacht wasn't fighting itself. Custom games, anything goes and stays there. In: Lobby
Thread: Increase light jaegars price22 Dec 2018, 10:08 AM Jump back to quoted post21 Dec 2018, 23:50 PMaddvaluejack You are really a double standard man. So, give me an unit which cost 20 fuel but perform worse than OKW's 221. An unit's performance should be related to its price, don't you think so? Was it up to me, you'd have 223 only as 221 serves no purpose other then "lets see if OKW can do anything else but voks opening". Jump back to quoted post22 Dec 2018, 04:04 AMaddvaluejack You don't need guards, M3 and Universal Carrier both can win one-on-one with 221. And M3 only cost 5 fuel and UC cost no fuel. You can try that in cheat mode. For utility, 221 can only dispatch medic, nothing more. M3 and UC can transport infantry. I think transport ability is useful for a vehicle who can not capture. Don't you think so? Assuming a-move is the maximum extend of your micro that is. Do you really need someone to explain to you how a unit with a turret beats a unit without it when they have same range? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Increase light jaegars price21 Dec 2018, 23:30 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Dec 2018, 23:17 PMWiderstreit This 80mp is the key e.g. for Osttruppen to send the 2nd unit in while HMG42 arrives and cooldown of 1st Osttrupp ended. You know what that means? You skip T1 and the Faust-ability. And that you don't know that shows up, that you have no idea of Osttruppen if you like to compare Cons with them. And for soviet that means, that your molotov upgrade arrives earlyer etc. OR that you can play more aggresive. How was MG-spaming got 'fixed'? Increasing their price form 240 to 260. Edit: And Katitof, you have simply no perspicacity and no meaningful contributions. Well, I'll have to enlighten you: Soviets do not have osttruppen, they also do not have T0 best-in-game HMG. You know what they also do not have? Extra starting MP compared to 100 okw and 80 ost. And no, molo won't arrive earlier, you can already go for early molos after 2nd cons and you won't even have muni to throw 2, how is that relevant? You can't be anymore aggressive, unless you show me your 1000 IQ plays and all the different things you can do within the between 1 and 2 seconds which would resuly from the discount. How was maxim spamming fixed? By nerfing DPS, veterancy, mobility, suppression, scalability, nerfing vet1, increasing reinforce cost AND increasing cost. Can you be anymore clueless and ignorant? (don't answer, its not a challenge) And lastly, thanks kettle, but you should be the one staying as far from posting in any kind of balance discussion as its humanly possible. Have you even played soviets outside of that one time you did on campaign? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Increase light jaegars price21 Dec 2018, 23:12 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Dec 2018, 23:01 PMWiderstreit This 30sek is gg versus assault engineers. You have to see the hole game. Not only a hand full of units. For example, that is something Katitof isn't able to do. And like I said. If you make cons cheaper and put HMG42 into T1, then you have to put Grens into T0. Assault pioneers are so spamabe, that without a litte nerf they will force youn into base without the HMG42 in that 30sek. Same as Penals are too effective in comaprison with other units. Same as Jägers need higher price. Edit: When did you see Sturmgrenadiers the last time? Or do you mean Sturmpioneers of OKW? Speaking of things certain individuals aren't able to do - apparently you are completely incapable of entering a garrison or keeping(any) 2 squads together in early game in the direction where you expect assault engies to be. Pios and grens are more then enough to fend them off, but you need a little more micro then you are capable of. And if you think Assault engies are OP in early game, you must be loosing your shit over sturmpios then. If you make cons 20mp cheaper, nothing will happen outside of upgrades being little bit more affordable. You whined that they'll be spammable. 4 cons would be 80 mp saved. AT nades cost 125. You'd have to buy 11 con squads to have 12th "free", how is that spammable in your head? As someone not-so-smart once said: You have to see the hole game. Not only a hand full of units. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Increase light jaegars price21 Dec 2018, 22:53 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Dec 2018, 22:03 PMWiderstreit So, I don't have such a problem with with them. But, if you look in other themes in Forum, then there are some larger problems. - Many people think Cons are too bad for their price. Reducing their price to 220mp would make them spam-able. - Many people wish that HMG42 arrives later like T1, but that needs a Penal nerf too. Grens Need to arrive then in T0 to have something versus Cons. - HMG42 is needed verus assault engineers. So, quick story. To fix little bit Soviet inf-line-up result in nerfing assault engineers. Squads performing well are more expensive. Squads performing bad are less expensive. Cons are the 2nd. HMG42 or penals have nothing to do with it, its exclusively cons being non scaling shit case. They are closer to osttruppen then grenadiers and you can't deny that without completely engulfing yourself in fanboi coat. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: can we now fix soviet T2 please?21 Dec 2018, 09:39 AM Jump back to quoted post21 Dec 2018, 09:36 AMgbem if conscripts were supposed to be zerglings... what are they now? Pretty much everything using mosin that isn't guards is a drone. Yes, cheap, yes, spammable, no, completely ineffective in combat. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: can we now fix soviet T2 please?21 Dec 2018, 09:06 AM Jump back to quoted post21 Dec 2018, 09:01 AMelchino7 Maxims, the terran bunker of Coh2. Maybe 2 years ago. Now its more like Protoss photon cannon. With all surroundign pylons destroyed. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: can we now fix soviet T2 please?20 Dec 2018, 20:51 PM Jump back to quoted post20 Dec 2018, 14:06 PMStug life hello guys today with dora we will do some math lesson yeaa, what is 6x4 ? it's 24 gj guys, now what's 6x3,6 ? 21,6 gj guys, now for the last one, 480/24 ? 20 , and 320/21,6 ? its 14,5 gj guys but now go to advanced math we need to count received acc so it becomes 19 seconds and 16 (im being a bit generous) seconds respectively in conclusion cons beat green at close range with 3 seconds of advantage this is not counting that green lose 1/4 of their dps for each man while cons only lose 1/6 now kat where were when the teacher was explaing math in school ? Don't stop there, keep going, don't ignore LMG upgrade either. Remember that these are also conscripts, not Warp Spiders, they will have to actually approach target first, not blink into CQC range and they will deal 50% less dps while receiving full for at least 2-3 seconds. See? I'm encouraging you, that's way better educational method then scolding. In: COH2 Balance