Profile of Jaigen

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1130

General Information


Thread: M3s unbeatable3 Jun 2014, 12:17 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Jun 2014, 11:55 AMAbdul Keep in mind he loses capping power when he gets m3s. So do you. perhaps even more so. gustav strat is correct but on some maps it will completely destroy your ability to hold territory In: COH2 Balance
Thread: M3s unbeatable3 Jun 2014, 11:47 AM Jump back to quoted post3 Jun 2014, 09:55 AMGustavGans Keeping your units together does not mean that they all sit in the same sector and wait for the m3s to come. You just have to make sure that there's always a second grensquad or an mg nearby so you can hold the m3 at bay. Like a fishswarm, swimm loosely and once the predator appears bulk up. So you need to use 2 times more mp to counter his m3? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Lets talk Pgrens.3 Jun 2014, 11:43 AM Jump back to quoted post3 Jun 2014, 05:39 AMKatitof Effective against what? Osttruppen? Because PGs will stomp them on all but far range in equal cover, grens are equal fight on mid range(no LMG obviously). And weapons with low effective range are for close range. That means PPSH and MP40. StG44 are most effective at mid range, but also great at close range, thing is, they are NOT assault troops because they have no characteristics of assault troop, no sprint, no durability, no armor, everything screams they are NOT for assaults. I really wish I could add something more here but FU NDA. Anything beyond 15 m and the lmg gren easily surpasses the pg's. yes they have decent midrange for cc troops. but its horribly cost ineffective to use them at mid range. you will bleed a horrible amount of mp for it. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Current balance for both faction3 Jun 2014, 09:05 AM Balance overall is good provided that you take a tiger doctrine to compensate for the under performing tier 3 and 4 of the germans. The latest patch has turned all medium armor in blatant favour for the soviets. Relic apparently forgot that they nerfed p4 and stug quite a bit to make room for the soviet tier 3. now that the t34 and p4 are more or less equal (or should be as the t-34 is far better AI and slightly better AT because it doesnt have an insane scatter) its time to buff the german tier 3 back to equal strength. and of course the panther need a major cost reduction. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: M3s unbeatable2 Jun 2014, 22:21 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Jun 2014, 19:05 PMVonIvan Idc if he played well, played badly, micro'd good, micro'd bad at times or w/e. All I care about is showing people how to counter them. It's so god damn simple. Go fast pak with heavy gren + mg into either another pak or dbl scout car. Also only faust if you know you can get 2 on him for sure, don't be ballsy, and stay together/anticipate his moves. You are correct but you also expected the m3 to appear and could adequately prepare for it. The m3 as a whole is a bit to powerful right now as teching to tier 2 takes longer. if you ask me they should reduce fuel for teching to tier 2 and increase it for tier 3. this would also solve some of the maxim problems. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Lets talk Pgrens.2 Jun 2014, 17:47 PM double post In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Lets talk Pgrens.2 Jun 2014, 17:47 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Jun 2014, 16:29 PMFestiveLongJohns Pgrens are not meant to be CC troops. Yes they do lots of damage at close range, but you aren't meant to charge them into close range anymore. Part of their built in cost is the flexibility they provide with the double shreck upgrade. Turning an early game anti-infantry unit into a mid game soft counter to armor is valuable, and needs to be taken into account when determining their cost. If they are not CC troops then they are nothing more then very cost ineffective grens. so thx for clarifying how worthless they are. And im paying 120 ammo for the shreks and the pg lose half their AI power your argument is downright stupid. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Lets talk Pgrens.2 Jun 2014, 17:40 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Jun 2014, 15:24 PMOZtheWiZARD They are NOT close combat troops any more! I have had some great successes with them lately using them as the mid range unit. Wiping out 2 squads of Cons closing in on you - priceless. Thats because your still in the rookie level, high level players rarely make such stupid mistakes. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Lets talk Pgrens.2 Jun 2014, 10:08 AM Jump back to quoted post2 Jun 2014, 07:22 AMCruzz Every infantry squad lost their 100% FOTM, why should the least range limited one get it back? Because they need something to make them as cost effective as grens. also when you compare them to the 2 other cc troops you realise that other ones are better. assault grens are much cheaper have more durability and have sprint. shocks nearly have twice the durability of a pg squad not to mention smoke grenade to cover the advance. the lack of smoke grenade , sprint and durability on top of that they are extremely expensive to reinforce makes the pg the weakest cc troops in the game. ther medium range firepower doesn't make up for that In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Lets talk Pgrens.30 May 2014, 13:25 PM Jump back to quoted post30 May 2014, 12:13 PMBurts They have the best mid range DPS and beat every single squad 1v1 at mid range. I'd say thats pretty good. it isnt when you compare them to the price your paying for them. the mp bleed is severe and a gren squad with a lmg simply performs just as well. In: COH2 Balance