Profile of Jaigen

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1130

General Information


Thread: Panther overnerfed14 Jun 2014, 20:44 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Jun 2014, 20:11 PMPuppetmaster No people will just have to learn to use the new panther instead of whining that the old op panther doesnt exist anymore. Blitz was OP no doubt about that. stat was wise it was fine In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Panther overnerfed14 Jun 2014, 18:59 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Jun 2014, 18:28 PMMr. Someguy The Panther's AI and AT is better than before, it's durability, speed, and cost got nerfed. Nobodies gives a damn about the panthers AI because its not their to do AI. alos it cost 50 ammo for a meagre AI upgrade. In my opinion the nerfs to the panther last patch safe for blitz need to be gone if the panther is ever going to be cost effective. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why this game is almost balanced14 Jun 2014, 08:34 AM We already discussed this and the best solution without nerfing the m3 is to decrease the fuel cost of BF 2 with 20 and increase the fuel cost of BF 3 with 20. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Teching and call ins. 12 Jun 2014, 15:46 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Jun 2014, 15:31 PMKatitof Oh, nice, another attempt at discrediting me. You've proven here that your posts bear no value and arguments hold no weight as they are completely detached from reality, so you're trying to take someone with you on your sinking ship? I'm saying 'sinking ship' like that would mean you had any creditability before. Spoiler alert. You can't even make a good argument why KV-1 would be better then T34/76 and get a single person to back you up with it. Why do you even try other then arguing for the sake of arguing? Extra large because im laughing extra hard. I stated my opinion why i consider the kv1 better .what you make it of it is your own business In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Teching and call ins. 12 Jun 2014, 15:23 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Jun 2014, 12:27 PMKatitof No one compares it to 34/85. Its bad compared to 34/76. Cruzz said it there in its post and you still try some strawman argument. You dont even know what a strawmen is . And dont bother looking it up now because you are already looking like an idiot. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Teching and call ins. 12 Jun 2014, 12:16 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Jun 2014, 10:14 AMCruzz KV-1 is just plain bad right now. The only thing it kinda does good against is PIV, anything else you'd actually be BETTER off with a T34/76. Compared to the t-34-85 it indeed is bad. The t-34 still has a decent change of losing to the p4. the kv1 will flat out steam roll it unless the p4 gets really lucky. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Teching and call ins. 12 Jun 2014, 09:13 AM Jump back to quoted post12 Jun 2014, 05:21 AMKatitof Given how almost everything have well over 50% to pen KV-1 and how it have less HP then T34/85? I'd question your statement. While its fine for KV-8, KV-1 is a paper with a pea shooter. Slow, squishy tank with a gun made for flanking. and 50% more armor then the t-34-85. Alos the t-34-85 is a bit to cost effective at the moment. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Lets talk Pgrens.11 Jun 2014, 21:46 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Jun 2014, 21:33 PMwehrwolfzug Risk vs reward is true. However in your risk assessment you must also factor in your flamer getting a bad critical hit and blowing up your pio squad or becoming useless. Personally I would choose the pg squad as a bundle nade will pretty much squad wipe the enemy in a few seconds. Assault rifles will kill what's left. You may lose a few models of pg troops but you will most likely have vet. Retreat and heal. Now you have a vet pg squad, and double shreking a vet pg squad is very lethal against tanks that you will flank with side or rear shots. It is kind of like choosing which grenadier squad to upgrade with the lmg. I always upgrade the squads with vet first. They are more likely to stay alive better and kill better which vets them up even quicker. Works with pios too if you do a double pio start. Upgrade to flamer on the first pio squad that gets vet. Another trick when flanking with pg is to have a damage soak squad to be just ahead of you pg squad. Should be enough time to get that bundle nade or shrek golly off. I use pios without flames or ostruppen for this purpose as they are cheap and easy to reinforce. Lovely you just assume he will eat the bundeld nade. also vet does shit for shrek grens. and thx for the veterancy lesson captain obvious. and the rest is not even relevant to the cost effectiveness of the pg which is non existent. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Lets talk Pgrens.11 Jun 2014, 19:40 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Jun 2014, 18:51 PMwehrwolfzug I clearly said that the cost upfront for panzer shreks is because you do not have to pay for each use unlike panzer Faust where there is no cost upfront and therefore they are pay per use. I am not sure why you cannot clearly comprehend that? Maybe the idea is not borderline retarded, maybe it is your lack of ability to understand this simple concept..... The free assault rifles do not entice you because you have issues with simple match/economics and basic flanking tactics. You should not speak for anyone as you are insulting their basic cognitive thinking abilities by comparing theirs to your own. Any infantry squad can flank if the player has the mental aptitude to move a mouse cursor and click on the map using a little map and situational awareness. Conscripts flank all the time even without Oorah. Flanking is all about high risk high reward as you essentially send units behind the enemy. PG are to much of a risk you better send a pio squad. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Lets talk Pgrens.11 Jun 2014, 18:29 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Jun 2014, 18:01 PMwehrwolfzug They are the same squishy ness as grenadiers because they are grenadiers with a different load out. They are just as survivable as Grens with g43' except they do not have a rifle nade. And if not having a rifle nade makes them too squishy then I proves my point that the rifle nade is the issue just like I said it was. You pay munitions for the panzer shrek upgrade but you pay munitions because you do not have pay each time you use them unlike the panzer Faust. In coh1 storm troopers cost the same and you had to pay for the assault rifles upgrade and the panzer shreks separately. In coh2 you get the assault rifles free for the same cost as storm troopers in coh1. Again the extra cost for pg is the free assault rifles, bundle nade ability and the ability to upgrade them to the best at infantry in the game. The high reinforce cost is to prevent spamming. The squad does a great job in the hands of a skilled player. So an offensive ability somehow is creates better defence? i cannot even begin to comprehend that particular line of thought. But i will correct you. Grens do need to leave their cover. pg do to be effective damage dealers. Also comparing fausts to shreks is borderline retarded. really the only thing they have in common is that they are used by infantry Also free assault rifles or smg's for that matter doesnt entice me or anyone. the last patch made cover all important and that pushed infantry that uses lmg's rifles or carbines to the forefront and only made shocktroopers useful in the long run as they are the most durable infantry unit out their but even they got greatly reduced in effectiveness compared to the last patch. In: COH2 Balance