Profile of thedarkarmadillo

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 5279

General Information


Thread: AEC and Bofors Tech.19 Jul 2020, 23:25 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Jul 2020, 19:44 PMKatitof Why would anyone get it at T3 timing? That's the point when it becomes completely irrelevant. Meh. It could have some use in terms of AA or a check cut off surprise. Im not against the suggestion. Not like at that timing it's going to hold a lot of ground, but it'll help by making the enemy need to commit more than an infantry squad. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: I have to admit, USF Paratroopers are...19 Jul 2020, 13:56 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Jul 2020, 08:58 AMT.R. Stormjäger I suspect this is just here to prepare us for another thread asking for a nerf. He's getting crafty. This IS a falls OP thread with a facia. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Nerf the Valentine18 Jul 2020, 20:20 PM No, doctrinal units need to be balanced but are not necessarily bound by stock design. Fuck. Soviet literally have a Sherman. How come they have a unit that uses USFs "thing"? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Nerf the Valentine18 Jul 2020, 20:05 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Jul 2020, 19:26 PMblvckdream The standard value for tanks is 0.5 other than USF which has 0.75 because their theme is "mobility". So why should the Valentine have 0.75? It's not fair considering the timing. It means it has a easier time hitting LVs+ medium tanks without stop-microing every shot. It's relevant against any vehicle so please elaborate how it doesn't matter? Ostheer thing is squishy infantry but have multiple doctrinal options for having more durable units. Soviet thing is shitty armour but have doctrinal armour that isn't shitty.... Doctrines bring something new to the faction. In this case it's a mobile medium light tank. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: General Power of Factions in 1v1 18 Jul 2020, 18:53 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Jul 2020, 16:37 PMIncendiaryRounds I'd be flattered if you actually took the time for an in-depth performance review. But who reviews the reviewer? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: General Power of Factions in 1v1 18 Jul 2020, 16:29 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Jul 2020, 16:15 PMIncendiaryRounds I was always here. I don't post willy nilly. My unofficial job is to keep the forums at a respectable IQ level for all members. We need to review your performance. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Nerf the Valentine18 Jul 2020, 15:29 PM Let's just make all fucking call ins built from t0 when the CP are popped so we have the build time as a balance factor. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Nerf the Valentine17 Jul 2020, 20:59 PM Build time or tech lock and it should be fine. It's got good performance but not overbearing. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: AEC and Bofors Tech.17 Jul 2020, 20:58 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Jul 2020, 18:34 PMSir Edgelord I can agree with that, but also a question: It can bounce with this ability??? I thought it always pens thus always applies. Wth does the one shot means, by the way? Sander covered it, it was my error I actually didn't know it couldn't bounce but I did know that sometimes it wouldn't work. Must have been the missing bit. But yea as sander said it actually takes 2 shots for full effect and even then, while it IS an immobilize, it's only temporary. Considering it's in a side tech, vet locked 2 shot ability if day frankly, it's fine. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: AEC and Bofors Tech.17 Jul 2020, 16:56 PM If the AECs ability is vet 3 it better be guaranteed to pen and only be 1 shot and free. It's not without risk In: COH2 Balance